| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In particular, creating a `mail.message` automatically invalidates the
corresponding `record.message_ids`.
closes odoo/odoo#30737
|
|
A many2one field that is required means that its column cannot contain
null values, however the default ondelete policy for all m2o fields is
`set null`, which contradicts `required=True`.
This patch will, by default, apply the `restrict` policy to required m2o
fields unless the ondelete attribute is explicitly specified. However,
if the policy specified is `set null`, a ValueError will be raised
whenever the registry registers the field as this makes no sense.
The default ondelete policy remains unchanged for non-required m2o
fields (set null)
closes odoo/odoo#30122
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#30614
|
|
Define a field on a model as:
- o2m to res.partner
- the field's column, hence its name, has capital letters in it
(studio does that)
create two objects of that class, each one linked to a different partner with the new o2m
merge the partners
Before this commit, the object linked to the second partner, was deleted
This was because merge partner sql requests did not quote the column name
After this commit, the second object still exists
OPW 1925060
closes odoo/odoo#30300
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#29323
|
|
This commit allows for not copying the currency_field attribute
of a monetary field when the monetary field is related,
and when the currency_field attribute is not explicit
Before this commit, the currency_field attribute on the related monetary
was set as the one on the distant model
After this commit, the currency_field attribute takes the field on the
current model
Though the test may appear like an incoherent use case,
it is on the contrary totally legit, as web_studio allows it
OPW 1903113
closes odoo/odoo#28144
|
|
Introduce official support for SVG files in the framework, including the
following parts:
1. When client-side SVG images are uploaded, the content is displayed until
you save using data URI scheme according RFC 2397 [1]. This scheme requires
to specify content format. Using hardcoded "image/png" works for all images
types except SVG.
Type-sniffing is done using "magic byte" detection via the first base64
encode byte, so that the proper data URI scheme can be used.
This should not cause SVG-related security problems as the file is
displayed through `<img>` tag, which does not allow SVG scripting [2].
2. Make /web/image controller compatible with SVG
3. Add support for SVG files for company logo, which uses a dedicated
controller.
4. Resizing of SVG files is a no-op, as it makes little sense for a
vector-based format. We also want to avoid micro-alterations to the SVG
document (in "natural" viewport parameters) as we would store multiple
copies of the files in the filestore.
5. Because SVG files are inherently dangerous, upload of SVG files is
restricted to administrators, either by blocking it directly before
saving it in the database (binary fields with attachment=False), or by
neutering them to text/plain mimetype (for binary fields with
attachment=True)
6. Add tests for the SVG upload cases and for the non-admin uploads.
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2397
[2] https://www.w3.org/wiki/SVG_Security
Closes #26635
|
|
|
|
|
|
In other words, when a field F depends on a non-stored field G, it also depends
on G's dependencies. This guarantees that whenever a dependency of G is
modified, F will be invalidated and marked to recompute (if necessary).
The transitive closure of dependencies is not computed over stored fields.
Anyway stored fields already trigger the recomputation of their dependent
fields during their recomputation. The performance impact on the loading of a
registry is negligible (less than 1%), and the increase of recomputation
triggers is small (less than 10%).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When updating record using "record.field = value", we need to ensure that
all fields in cache depending on "record.field" will be recomputed.
|
|
|
|
We sometimes use in Odoo a One2many field with an inverse Integer
field instead of a usual Many2one.
This allow for example in several instances to have a "Many2one" which
can be reference from several models, eg:
Model Ranking:
name = String field
res_id = Integer field
res_model = String field
Model Toy:
rank = One2many [inverse: Ranking -> res_id]
[domain: res_model == Toy]
Model Tool:
rank = One2many [inverse: Ranking -> res_id]
[domain: res_model == Tool]
This enable us to have a shared feature between otherwise unrelated models.
But there was several issue when searching on these One2many:
1) if the Integer Many2one was not stored (eg. it came from an inherits) on
the searched model, this could lead to an error.
2) when we searched:
- by IDs (rank in ['55']) with at least one id not respecting the domain
- by IDs with a negative operator
- with a negative operator on unfound string (rank != "no rank has this")
- with a false value (rank = False)
we would not apply the One2many domain (eg. res_model == Toy) and thus
possibly getting Toy 3 errenously because a Tool 3 was found without
the domain being applied.
This fix modify the search on One2many and for:
1. if the inverse is an Integer not stored field instead of Many2one
manage it.
2. if the field is an Integer field instead of Many2one and there is a
domain on the One2many: apply the domain on the inverse model found.
So only some search on One2many with a domain whose inverse field is an
Integer could be impacted.
This would also be nice to have for all One2many with a domain but the
probability of it being useful versus risk for performance is not judged
high enough.
opw-710508
|
|
This removal has led to a necessary refactoring:
- make the setup of field attributes extensible;
- make the instantiation of custom fields extensible;
- delegate model and field reflection to `ir.model` and `ir.model.fields`;
- move the implementation of sparse and serialized fields to module `base_sparse_field`;
|
|
|
