summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/addons/website_partner/data/website_partner_data.xml
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-08-03[IMP] *: correctly read/write website_publishedRomain Derie
The `website_published` field from the website's mixins is basically a readonly from `is_published` field. On read, this field will simply read `is_published` and check if the record's website_id is accessible (only for the multi mixin). On write, it will always write on `is_published`. This commit improves a few things: - A lot of code was writting on website_published which was just then writting on is_published. Writting directly on is_published makes more sense. - Some backend fields would still reference `website_published` instead of `is_published` which would just go through the related for no reason. Plus, using `is_published` will make the field tooltip more accurate as we are not in a website context ('Visible on current website' to 'Is Published') - Filter and search on tree view were still using the `website_published` related field, which is just a readonly when we are not in a frontend context. - Some create and write function would have security check on `website_published` value but that was wrong as the user could bypass that by simply writting on `is_published`. For the write method, check `is_published` is more accurate as it will cover both case since `website_published` will then call the write method on `is_published`
2015-11-24[REINDENT] website_partner: reindentThibault Delavallée
Due to the use of odoo tag in xml files some reindenting is necessary.
2015-11-24[MIG] website_partner: migrated into new apiSrushti Patel
2015-11-24[MOV] website_partner: reorganize filesThibault Delavallée
Follow the new API guidelines for naming files and conventions.