| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Commit 850e1675eb improved the website.menu creation on module install
(eg: /shop for website_sale).
This commit aims to do the same on module uninstall.
Before this commit:
Uninstalling a website module would uninstall its website.menu (/shop) stored
on the default menu tree.
But the copies of that default menu, on websites, would remains.
Indeed, there is no direct link between the default menus and its copies.
More annoyingly, installing that website module again after uninstalling it
would create a new copy of the default menu, resulting in multiple same menus
on website.
Now, if the menu to be uninstalled is in the default tree menu, we remove all
its copies (the website.menu having that same URL).
Closes #27488, closes #27721
|
|
Previously, for multi-websites it was decided that:
- creating a new website would not get already existing apps menu (shop,
blog, forum..).
- installing a new app would create the app's menu on existing website
This was decided mostly for technical reason but it is a weird behavior.
This commit saves the installed apps menus in order to copy them on new website
If this default menu got deleted, we ensure a minimalist tree menu for new
website
Note: This also fixes the bug where installing a website_module more than once
(with -i website_module in command line) would create the menu (blog, shop,
forum..) on the first website a second time.
This was because the website.menu.create() overrided in website would
return the last created record in the self loop, thus the last one created
would be the one set to the xml_id (ir.model.data).
This commit closes #27253
|
|
sale_report, ...
Fix bug from the initial poc of JOV
Fix menu creation
- creating a menu would create a 'container' menu in the DB (.create is call without website_id)
then writing on it would copy (if condition to cow) the menu with a website_id leaving the first
one as a menu container unused.
- website_menu should always have a website_id
we dont want to support the multiwebsite system that allow to have generic/specific menu
unlink/write is useless now since we always have a website_id
Make unique_path website dependent, 2 distinct website can have a page with same name
Make Sale report multiwebsite compliant
Make website_id on sale_order / account.invoice as a related stored from partner_id.
Co-authored-by: Derie Romain <rde@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Kersten Jérémy <jke@odoo.com>
|
|
This implements support to administer multiple websites. Although the
core functionality already existed, managing multiple websites was
fairly technical.
In the interest of database updates and migration this attempts to
keep duplicated data to a minimum. To do this the usual generic
records are rendered unless some website-specific record exists that
replaces it. Copy-on-write (COW) is used to create these
website-specific records. Through this mechanism creating a
website-specific record is delayed until necessary. A COW mechanism
has been implemented on 4 models: ir.ui.view, website.page,
website.menu and ir.attachment. These COW mechanisms are activated
when editing data through the website (aka frontend). These frontend
edits (e.g. with web_editor) will be website-specific, possibly
creating a website-specific record when necessary. When editing data
in the backend nothing special will happen, even when editing a
generic record. Note that because of this mechanism also facilitates
the ability to create new, uncustomized websites because the generic
data is kept.
Support is provided for a website to have any theme. Themes are fairly
complex to handle. Standalone themes can depend on other standalone
themes (e.g. theme_beauty depends on theme_loftspace) and themes
usually modify some data of the themes they depend on. Because a theme
can be installed on multiple websites, using website_id m2o fields
does not work well. It would require duplicate data, making updates
and migration harder. Because of this, data for themes (ir.ui.view and
ir.attachment specifically) have a theme_id m2o. website has a
theme_ids m2m that identifies all theme modules currently installed on
it. Through these fields we figure out what to render. A theme is only
fully uninstalled when it's no longer active on any website. The
advantage of this approach is that upgrading or migrating theme data
is no different from the single-website case.
The website.published.mixin class was modified to handle multiple
websites. A wizard was added in the backend to easily manage this for
multiple website.
Although not used anywhere in this commit, a 'website_id' variable has
been added in the evaluation context of ir.rule. It allows to easily
make any model multi-website aware, all that's needed is a custom
website_id m2o field on a model and a custom record rule.
|
