| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
* account, auth_signup, payment, portal, project, sale, sale_management,
web_unsplash, website, website_mail, website_rating, website_sale
This commit does probably not do what is stated for all non-website apps
but it is a first step. It also uses the system in apps which could have
already used it but did not.
Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29442
task-1932066
|
|
* website_forum, website_gengo, website_mail_channel, website_sale
Following the new editor's merge at https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29775,
the web_editor.context module was moved to website without being
renamed. This commit renames it to website.context but also merge the
website extension that was made to that context directly within its
definition.
closes odoo/odoo#30409
|
|
animation is completed
Use this new class in website_forum to avoid that the tour click during
the animation and fail randomly.
https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.0/components/modal/#events
|
|
* mass_mailing, payment, point_of_sale, portal, survey, web, web_tour,
website_blog, website_crm_partner_assign, website_event,
website_event_questions, website_form, website_forum, website_gengo,
website_hr_recruitment, website_links, website_mail,
website_mail_channel, website_mass_mailing, website_quote,
website_sale, website_sale_options, website_slides, website_twitter
This commit reviews the whole "JS side" of the web_editor and website
apps. This is a first step to be able to improve them with new and
better functionnalities; this commit is not supposed to change any
visual behavior.
The main goal was to achieve a structure similar to the backend one.
Now, the frontend side also has a root widget (like the WebClient)
and all other widgets are attached to it one way or another. This allows
the benefits of using the 'trigger_up' functionnality for example.
As RPC are now mainly done with the `this._rpc` functionnality (being
possible thanks to the parent hierarchy), the frontend will also be
possible to test thanks to QUnit in a future update (besides the "text"
editor side which still requires a refactoring to be able to do that).
---
Here are some of the changes:
(-) conventions and documentation
The code has been updated to follow JS conventions and a lot of code has
been commented (around +2000 lines of comment). This also means that
lots of functions have been renamed to use camelCase or simply to make
their name understandable.
See https://github.com/odoo/odoo/wiki/Javascript-coding-guidelines.
(-) deprecated: web_editor.base
The "web_editor.base" module has been split and does not force the
modules which require it to wait for DOM ready anymore. This was indeed
slowing loading times, but also prevented to use some modules in some
contexts (see the LESS editor use in web_studio which is the subject of
another task).
Now the "editor context" can be got thanks to the "web_editor.context"
JS module with its "get" function.
The "web_editor.base" module should probably not be used anymore (see
its code and recent updates).
(-) new: web.dom_ready
If a JS module should wait for the DOM to be ready to be executed, a
new JS module has been created: "web.dom_ready". This should always
be used in a module which only want to instantiate stuff. Do not
extend (or worst, include) classes after DOM ready.
(-) website.website
The "website.website" module has been split. "website.website" does not
return anything useful anymore, it just initialize some miscellaneous
stuff, without waiting for the DOM to be ready. You might want to check
"website.utils", "website.content.compatibility" or `WebsiteRoot`. Also
`website.form` has been deleted (use `this._rpc`), so has been
`website.error`. `website.prompt` will be removed in a future update to
be replaced by `Dialog.prompt`.
(-) widgets are great
Many classes which were not widgets are now widgets. This allows them to
use the 'events', the 'xmlDependencies' and the 'this._rpc' features for
example. Here are some of the main ones:
- Snippet options: these were classes with a `$el` for the menu element
and `$target` for the customized element. This is still the case
but following standard `Widget` structure (one exception: using
`this.$(...)` searches in the `$target` as before this update).
- Snippet animations: instead of class instances with a `$target`
element which can be `start` and `stop`, these are now standard
widgets which can be `start` and `destroy`. `this.$target` is
an alias to `this.$el` for ease of compatibility.
- Snippet editors: instead of class instances in charge of an editor
overlay, these are now widgets. Each "child" snippet editor is
properly attached as a "child", which allows editors to communicate
and to be properly destroyed.
(-) root widgets and website navbar
The frontend is different of the backend. In the backend, the page has
an empty <body/> element and all the components are instantiated from
parent to children (i.e. the `WebClient` is instantiated and is in
charge of instantiating the `ControlPanel`, etc). The frontend cannot
work like that on page loadings as they are way more frequent than in
the backend and we do not want them to flicker. A frontend page is
loaded as a <body/> element which already contains the website navbar
and its menus and the whole content page. JS code has to be "attached"
to these existing elements. This is possible thanks to the `RootWidget`
instances and the specialized `WebsiteRoot`, `IframeRoot` and
`WebsiteNavbar` (see code for details).
(-) lazy loading
No more (or at least a lot less) XML/JS has to be loaded on page
loading, thanks to the use of the `Widget.xmlDependencies` feature.
XML which have to be lazy loaded is loaded only on related Widget
instantiation if necessary, which allows to execute a lot of JS code
before the DOM is ready and to start many widgets on DOM ready (not
later). A visual benefit of this is clicking on the 'edit' button as
soon as it is possible: before this commit, this was sometimes not
doing anything as event handlers were not binded yet.
Still a possible exception: loading the session and locales. This may
be asynchronous stuff which is still required before widget
instantiations but this will be the subject of another task.
(-) deprecated code and code location
More than reviewing code and organizing it, many apparent dead code was
removed. More importantly, mislocated code was put in the right app.
This is the case for snippet animations which is a concept for website
apps but was defined in the web_editor app, or some translation concepts
which were part of website but should have been part of web_editor.
---
There are probably more things to say about this commit but I will let
the comments speak for those.
|
|
Code managing language in URLs and redirection is moved from website
to http_routing. Override of _dispatch in website now consists in adding
website to the request.
url_for and is_multilang_url tools methods are also moved from website
to http_routing.ir_http as those are required for the moved code.
Some renaming is performed on request attributes previously added in
website. Indeed as website keyword may be misleading now a renaming
has been performed to better understand them :
* request.website_enabled -> request.is_frontend
* request.website_multilang -> request.is_frontend_multilang
* request.httprequest.cookies.get('website_lang') -> ('frontend_lang')
* first_pass variable in _dispatch is replaced by a new attribute of
request, routing_iteration, that is the number of routing iterations
currently done
|
|
Opening a modal in Odoo should be done thanks to the 'Dialog' class. In
the frontend, there can also be modals which are meant to be shown to
the unconnected frontend visitors and those should then get the style of
the website (bootstrap) and not the one of odoo. To manage this, the
website JS code was extending the Dialog class so that it adds the
'o_website_modal' class on modals which are opened thanks to the class.
The LESS code was then in charge of forcing the Odoo style on those.
This behavior is not the right one. "Visitors" modals should also be
able to be opened with the Dialog class. This commit is a first step
towards to the right behavior:
- The standard 'Dialog' adds the 'o_technical_modal' class on its root
element by default and allows to not put it thanks to 'technical'
options.
- 'o_website_modal' is then replaced by 'o_technical_modal'.
What should be done next is:
- Use the Dialog class when it is possible
- Move modal.less in the common assets and make it style only technical
modals -> remove some forcing of the style on 'o_technical_modal' in
the frontend
This behavior also allows future improvements, like building a
completely different structure for technical modals which would allow
better designing and the end of visitor/technical bootstrap conflicts
(and so LESS efficiency).
|
|
Before this commit, the session object was responsible for loading the
translations in the backend only. There was then ugly code in web_editor
(which is also loaded in backend...) which was doing "if frontend then
load translations by myself". This code was also translating templates
while this is the qweb object's job. Now session is always responsible
for loading translation.
Note: the session object should be refactored/split.
|
|
* web_editor, web_planner, website
The 'Dialog' class is used in both backend and frontend. Also, lots of
actions can be done without the use of any modal. It thus makes sense
to lazy load its related xml only when a first modal is opened.
This change also allows to get rid of the "base_common.xml" file as the
dialog template is the only remaining one in there and, in the future
website update, it will allow to not load any static XML file on website
page loadings.
|
|
|
|
It is for example useful in the form builder with date-kind form field,
the translation of momentjs is done in french.
opw-707986
opw-749544
closes #17103
|
|
Website content is not supposed to use flex as it is not supported by
some old browsers. This commit provides a way to use flex only for
browsers which support it. When designing a snippet, you can use flex
to design elements and then write other style for when flex is not
supported.
Using flex should however still be avoided when possible. But hopefully,
this commit will allow to build greater snippets whose ugly non-flex
style can be disabled on demand or dropped in a future odoo version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The Dialog dependency was missing
* The function arguments were wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publish buttons appeared in list view item in /shop with commit
5a5dd1e100bb2e5bc2a6e215a963322bbfbe98b1.
They however never worked for some reasons:
* The publish buttons were unclickable as the around style was badly
implemented: the section title was over the publish button
* Even if it was clickable, the publish button handler had no prevent
default, thus it submitted the form it is in -> crash when no cart
button or added to cart on click on publish button if there was a cart
button...
Note: the style should be reviewed in next versions, this commit, as
a 9.0 fix, fixes the style with the minimum code and so that it does
not break any theme.
|
|
web_editor Qweb: Add 'zoom' option for widget image
<span t-field="product.image_small" t-options="{'widget': 'image', 'zoom': 'image_medium'}" />
website: Add Zoom code to be standard for all website module
website_sale: add zoom on Main product image
|
|
* The debug manager contains a feature to launch tours, adapt it
to new web_tour.tour system
* The website help menu allowed to relaunch tutorial tour in debug
mode. This feature is not adapted to new tour system and was useless
in the first place (debug mode in frontend is barely used anyway).
-> remove the website help menu and the feature
|
|
* Always allow to delete a part (and delete parent if empty)
* Show parent options (by displaying the snippet name if any,
"column" for col-* and "Block" otherwise)
* ...
|
|
* Remove dead code + optimization
* Use Dialog API from web module
* Reorganize files
* Correct buggy $() function for snippet option class
* Add comments
* Fix the snippet parent navigation :
If a page contained a three level snippet structure (i.e A contains
B contains C), when editing the following bug occured :
If B or C was selected first, parenting buttons were correctly set.
But if selecting A then C, clicking on the parent lead to going back
on A instead of going on B.
* Fix snippet thumbnail layout
* Better isolate ui css from themes
* MediaDialog image list : prevent displaying empty attachments
* ...
|
|
* Adapt DOM selectors
* Refactore dialog XMLs to have odoo styling
* New editor options (background-position, ...)
* Various improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If anybody adds a new modal in the `then()` part of the promise, without
this code, all `.modal-backdrop` elements will be deleted, and further
dialogs will not be modal; with this, only the current modal's backdrop
will be deleted.
|
|
* add CSRF token as core.csrf_token
* add CSRF tokens to client-generated and/or JS-submitted forms
* remove broken "compatibility" mode of web.ajax.post
/cc @dmo-odoo I've no idea how that was supposed to work, from looking
things up all modern browsers seem to support FormData, and old IEs
which don't don't support fallbacks either and would require
submitting an actual form as fallback so...
|
|
Widgets and website display images or display the type with icon like pdf, doc...
|
|
|
|
This allows to always have the templates in base_common.xml in the
frontend.
|
|
website_project has been removed and this helper is now useless.
|
|
When dropping the snippet "Newsletter Popup", a modal appeared to choose
the newsletter. Once the button "Continue" was clicked, the modal was not
hidden and then it was impossible to scroll.
|
|
|
|
To be valid for the redirection, the url and the hash
must be percent encoded.
opw:646837
|
|
boot.js log:
* ``Missing dependencies``:
These modules do not appear in the page. It is possible that the JavaScript
file is not in the page or that the module name is wrong
* ``Failed modules``:
A javascript error is detected
* ``Rejected modules``:
The module returns a rejected deferred. It (and its dependent modules) is not
loaded.
* ``Rejected linked modules``:
Modules who depend on a rejected module
* ``Non loaded modules``:
Modules who depend on a missing or a failed module
|
|
Each module can return a deferred. In that case, the module is marked as loaded
only when the deferred is resolved, and its value is equal to the resolved value.
The module can be rejected (unloaded). This will be logged in the console as info.
Remove if_dom_contains from the website, the modules return a rejected deferred if
the DOM doesn't contains the seleted values.
|
|
|
|
for html field) and website
|
|
|
|
search box
|
|
|
|
times
|
|
failed modules, unloaded modules). Add odoo.init in the website to display debugging informations.
|
|
This reverts commit e18a3a43e44da86a92acbe77501838ec6deb87db.
website.error is used in the Javascript file it was removed from,
in website.js, line 350.
Another solution to not load this template when not needed has
to be found
opw-640822
|
|
|
|
To avoid loading unneccesary templates on every page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|