| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Before this commit, the routing map generated and used would be the one from
the website the request is performed, instead of the one from the `fw` website
ID which will be the one we redirect the user to.
This issue was introduced with the routing map by website, be8fc2296b38 and is
restricted to a single case: a publisher using the website switcher, and it
won't happen on next page naviguation/refresh as the `fw` website id will be
the same as the current website's ID. Thus there won't be any routing map
mismatch.
Step to reproduce:
- Create a page on website 2, set it as homepage
- Naviguate to website 1 on '/' url
- Naviguate to website 2 on '/' url
This will raise a werkzeug error about `EndPoint not iterable`.
----- Technical analysis ------
This is the current flow:
1. `_dispatch()` is setting `website_routing` to `get_current_website()` -> 2
2. `_dispatch()` is calling `_match()`
3. `_match()` is calling `routing_map()` with key = `website_routing`, which
was set to 2 in step 1.
4. `routing_map()` is calling `_generate_routing_rules()` which generate the
rules based on `website_routing`, which was set to 2 in step 1.
5. `_dispatch()` authenticate the user by calling `_authenticate()`
6. `_dispatch()` is calling `_add_dispatch_parameter()`, where URL param `fw`
is forced in session, so `get_current_website()` now return the correct
`website_id` -> 1
The issue: in order to handle the `fw` URL parameter (step 6.), we need to
check the rights to ensure we can allow the website switch.
To check rights, user need to be authenticated (step 5.), which is done after
generating the routing map (2. & 3. & 4.).
The routing map is generated based on the current website (step 1.)
Step 6 depends of steps 5 which depends of steps 2/3/4 which depend of step 1,
but step 1 should depend of step 6, which is an impossible cycle.
closes odoo/odoo#70278
X-original-commit: 878e28f93a65756fa2002ef2af5b02a3e2c59b1b
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie <rdeodoo@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
Before this commit, the 'mounted' method of the ControlPanel in
the website dashboard was called twice, when entering the dashboard.
It happened because the dashboard updated the ControlPanel before
being actually mounted, so mounted was called once when the
dashboard was mounted, and once when the update was applied.
Ideally, this should not be an issue (this isn't an issue with owl).
However, in Odoo, we mix layers of Owl Components and legacy
widgets. In these situations, the above scenario isn't properly
handled (and can't be).
As a consequence, in mobile (enterprise), it crashed because an
handler bound in mounted (thus twice) was only unbound once.
This commit avoids the issue by correctly setting the control
panel props before rendering it (the update was actually useless).
opw~2417307
closes odoo/odoo#63574
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
|
|
Without this commit, when clicking on a metric on the website dashboard, it
would not load the correct data.
Indeed, the dashboard is loaded for a specific website only, but clicking on a
metric opens the data for every website together.
Step to reproduce:
- Make some orders on 2 differents website ecommerce
- OPTIONAL: Get through the payment on some orders, then just leave some
products in the cart afterward to have some unpaid orders
- Go to the website dashboard, you see some metrics
- Change the selected website on top right, you see the metrics adapts
correctly
- Click on a metric, it doesn't fit the number you clicked on. For instance,
if you had 1 Unpaid Orders for website 1 and 3 Unpaid Orders for website 2,
you see 4 orders in the tree view once you have clicked the metric.
This commit ensures the correct website is appended to every dashboard action
domain.
opw-2369420
Fixes #44926, fixes #51125
|
|
If getLangDateFormat is called right in loading the js file, it returns
default format. We now call it when translations are ready.
closes odoo/odoo#42126
X-original-commit: e7a58430a382ca1161131e562d53bef3ea0e6ce0
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
|
|
|
|
Before this commit, 'Go to website' in website module dashboard might not
redirect to the correct website.
It would just redirect to `/` (href) without forcing the website selected in
the dashboard.
task-2063252
Closes #36390
closes odoo/odoo#37359
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
|
|
In the call to Chart.js we pass a ctx which should be a DOM element,
however we pass `null` as the ctx.
It seems that what happens is that we look for the DOM element inside
the `document` (via getElementById) but this element is not yet inserted
into the document, hence this returns `null`.
Since we already have a reference to the canvas element which should be
used as ctx, we can probably just reuse this reference
closes odoo/odoo#36072
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The UTM graph data in Website > Dasboard > Analytics is not getting
properly filtered on the basis of values of date_from and date_to on
website_sale dashboard.
The field confirmation date which is of type datetime while date_from
and date_to are of date string in local browser timezone.
Hence date_domain is not perfect as shown below on local date 29th april
2019, we would send:
('confirmation_date', '>=', '2019-04-22'),
('confirmation_date', '<=', '2019-04-29')
But in reality we could want a from midnight of week before the current
UTC day, and to current UTC now or 23:59:59 of current UTC day.
This way, the data sent back matches more what is expected, instead of
the preceding domain, we would then have the following:
- if UTC now corresponding to local now is on '2019-04-29'
('confirmation_date', '>=', '2019-04-22 00:00:00'),
('confirmation_date', '<=', '2019-04-29 23:59:59')
- if UTC now corresponding to local now is on '2019-04-28':
('confirmation_date', '>=', '2019-04-21 00:00:00'),
('confirmation_date', '<=', '2019-04-28 23:59:59')
- if UTC now corresponding to local now is on '2019-04-30':
('confirmation_date', '>=', '2019-04-23 00:00:00'),
('confirmation_date', '<=', '2019-04-30 23:59:59')
And each one will be displayed as days 22 up to 29 in line chart (with
local today 29 being the last day of the chart and contening orders of
the current UTC day).
With these change in the UTM pie chart:
- a local date that is before a UTC date => we see the sales from up to
today UTC instead of from up to before yesterday UTC
- a local date that is the same as an UTC date => we see the sale from
up to today UTC instead of yesterday UTC
And in the line chart (that already had half of the fix in f6fc7c23192):
- a local date that is before a UTC date => we see the sales from up to
today UTC instead of from up to yesterday UTC
- a local date that is after a UTC date => we see the sales of current
UTC day + range of days (eg. for a week 7) instead of current UTC day +
range of days minus 1 (eg. for a week 6).
opw-1971539
closes #33041
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Lempereur <nle-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit is one part of the task 'removing nvd3'.
We use now Chart.js to draw charts.
Task ID: 1946138
|
|
Part of task 1896658
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Christophe Matthieu <chm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: David Monjoie <dmo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: svs-odoo <svs@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt <vsc@odoo.com>
|
|
On the line chart of google analytics account, we have a tooltip with
lines ({date}
sessions: {number of session}) overlapping and going
outside of the modal width.
This does not happen on google examples, the only fix found is to
display the tooltip in HTML instead of SVG.
opw-1961605
closes #32285
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
|
|
to ControlPanel/Search view refactoring.
The ControlPanel being now inside the DOM of client actions, those
existing widgets needed to be adapted (in the way they define if
and how they want a ControlPanel, and in the way the manipulate
their DOM as it slightly changed). Tests needed to be adapted as
well.
Part of task 1893568
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
|
|
- Improve the website tour (typo, tip positions, etc) and added new
steps to publish a new page
- Make close button of 'Mobile Preview' more visible
- Fix the overflow for long menu names in menu editor dialog
- Change the menu string from 'Affix Top Menu' to 'Fixed Top Menu'
- Change theme customization dialog's title to 'Customize Theme'
from 'Customize this theme'
- Improve strings for Google Analytics
task-1895287
closes odoo/odoo#28199
|
|
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Go to Website > Dashboard > Analytics and click on "Link my analytics account"
- Enter some data and save
Bug:
A traceback was raised: TypeError: website_set_ga_data() missing 1 required
positional argument: 'website_id'
opw:1905874
closes odoo/odoo#28636
|
|
Set up env & tools for module website multiwebsite (blog, event, sale..)
website_id in modelConverter and ir_rule
add _compute_domain_keys to have a different cache per website
or rules would not be correctly website_dependant
eg: blog 1 on website 1, blog 2 on website 2
access blog 1 from website 1 => can access -> normal
access blog 1 from website 2 => can access -> should crash because (ir rule)
split mixing website.published.mixin and website.published.multi.mixin to have
website_id only on last one.
multi mixing will:
- override website_published compute to take current_website into account (not in backend)
- force website when clicking on published in backend
- website blog, website_sale, website_event, website_forum, website_slides are now multi website
Co-authored-by: Derie Romain <rde@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Kersten Jérémy <jke@odoo.com>
|
|
This implements support to administer multiple websites. Although the
core functionality already existed, managing multiple websites was
fairly technical.
In the interest of database updates and migration this attempts to
keep duplicated data to a minimum. To do this the usual generic
records are rendered unless some website-specific record exists that
replaces it. Copy-on-write (COW) is used to create these
website-specific records. Through this mechanism creating a
website-specific record is delayed until necessary. A COW mechanism
has been implemented on 4 models: ir.ui.view, website.page,
website.menu and ir.attachment. These COW mechanisms are activated
when editing data through the website (aka frontend). These frontend
edits (e.g. with web_editor) will be website-specific, possibly
creating a website-specific record when necessary. When editing data
in the backend nothing special will happen, even when editing a
generic record. Note that because of this mechanism also facilitates
the ability to create new, uncustomized websites because the generic
data is kept.
Support is provided for a website to have any theme. Themes are fairly
complex to handle. Standalone themes can depend on other standalone
themes (e.g. theme_beauty depends on theme_loftspace) and themes
usually modify some data of the themes they depend on. Because a theme
can be installed on multiple websites, using website_id m2o fields
does not work well. It would require duplicate data, making updates
and migration harder. Because of this, data for themes (ir.ui.view and
ir.attachment specifically) have a theme_id m2o. website has a
theme_ids m2m that identifies all theme modules currently installed on
it. Through these fields we figure out what to render. A theme is only
fully uninstalled when it's no longer active on any website. The
advantage of this approach is that upgrading or migrating theme data
is no different from the single-website case.
The website.published.mixin class was modified to handle multiple
websites. A wizard was added in the backend to easily manage this for
multiple website.
Although not used anywhere in this commit, a 'website_id' variable has
been added in the evaluation context of ir.rule. It allows to easily
make any model multi-website aware, all that's needed is a custom
website_id m2o field on a model and a custom record rule.
|
|
col-lg-* -> col-xl-*
col-md-* -> col-lg-*
col-sm-* -> col-md-*
col-xs-* -> col-*
col-lg-offset-* -> offset-xl-*
col-md-offset-* -> offset-lg-*
col-sm-offset-* -> offset-md-*
col-xs-offset-* -> offset-*
col-lg-pull-* -> order-xl-1
col-md-pull-* -> order-lg-1
col-sm-pull-* -> order-md-1
col-xs-pull-* -> order-1
col-lg-push-* -> order-xl-2
col-md-push-* -> order-lg-2
col-sm-push-* -> order-md-2
col-xs-push-* -> order-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before this commit, a client action was simply a subclass of Widget.
This is quite simple, but not really enough for the ActionManager. The
ActionManager needs to handle client actions in a different way that
view actions. Sometimes, it needs to check if a method exists before
calling it.
With this commit, we introduce a new abstraction: the AbstractAction
class, which defines a common API for all actions managed by the web
client.
Note that the API proposed in this commit is just the beginning. We will
introduce other methods in the future, to manage the focus, or the
scroll position, for example.
|
|
This rev. is the first part (out of 3) of the refactoring of the
ActionManager and ViewManager layer of the webclient.
The main changes are:
- there is no ViewManager anymore, its work is now handled by the
ActionManager itself, but isolated in a specific file ; this
eases a lot of things, as the breadcrumbs handling for example.
- the ActionManager code is converted to the new coding principles
and guidelines ; mainly, children widgets communicate with it by
triggering events up, and not by function calls anymore.
- the ActionManager layer is now testable, and a lot of tests have
already been written.
- the code in other addons has been adapted consequently.
What's coming next:
- introduce the 'AbstractAction' Widget, and make client actions
and view controllers inherit from it ; this widget will
implement a common API that could be used uniformly by the
ActionManager (e.g. restore(), canBeLeft(), renderButtons(),
getTitle()...).
- move the ControlPanel handling from the ActionManager to the
AbstractAction.
|
|
Purpose
=======
There are some usability issues in the website dashboard
Specification
=============
1/ Move button 'Go to Website' in the header
2/ Hide the action button bar if there's nothing in it
3/ Align the labels in the graph's legend
4/ Make the legend labels and display more obvious
5/ Modify the graph colors to be more readable
6/ Remove margins around todo buttons
|
|
Purpose
=======
When clicking on a dashboard element (eg: an invoice) and modifying it doesn't reload the dashboard, which could be confusing.
|
|
|
|
Before this commit, error thrown by scripts injected in DOM won't return a
clean error on window.onerror.
It would open the crash_manager's show_error's dialog that wouldn't display
any informations except "Script Error." and "Traceback:".
This is because of browser's security reason: it will just give you a
'Script error.' as message and nothing else for security issue.
Now, this kind of error will show a clearer message informing that it is
probably originating from a Javascript file served from a different origin.
There is now also the possibility for developers to handle/override the
behavior when this kind of error is catch to prevent the dialog to open for
example.
Might be of use:
https://blog.sentry.io/2016/05/17/what-is-script-error.html
https://stackoverflow.com/a/7778424
https://danlimerick.wordpress.com/2014/01/18/how-to-catch-javascript-errors-with-window-onerror-even-on-chrome-and-firefox/ (Search for Script Error)
|
|
Fix a bunch of ill-documented/incomplete/incorrect method docs
Without this, the automatic doc generation does not work.
|
|
|
|
* mass_mailing, payment, point_of_sale, portal, survey, web, web_tour,
website_blog, website_crm_partner_assign, website_event,
website_event_questions, website_form, website_forum, website_gengo,
website_hr_recruitment, website_links, website_mail,
website_mail_channel, website_mass_mailing, website_quote,
website_sale, website_sale_options, website_slides, website_twitter
This commit reviews the whole "JS side" of the web_editor and website
apps. This is a first step to be able to improve them with new and
better functionnalities; this commit is not supposed to change any
visual behavior.
The main goal was to achieve a structure similar to the backend one.
Now, the frontend side also has a root widget (like the WebClient)
and all other widgets are attached to it one way or another. This allows
the benefits of using the 'trigger_up' functionnality for example.
As RPC are now mainly done with the `this._rpc` functionnality (being
possible thanks to the parent hierarchy), the frontend will also be
possible to test thanks to QUnit in a future update (besides the "text"
editor side which still requires a refactoring to be able to do that).
---
Here are some of the changes:
(-) conventions and documentation
The code has been updated to follow JS conventions and a lot of code has
been commented (around +2000 lines of comment). This also means that
lots of functions have been renamed to use camelCase or simply to make
their name understandable.
See https://github.com/odoo/odoo/wiki/Javascript-coding-guidelines.
(-) deprecated: web_editor.base
The "web_editor.base" module has been split and does not force the
modules which require it to wait for DOM ready anymore. This was indeed
slowing loading times, but also prevented to use some modules in some
contexts (see the LESS editor use in web_studio which is the subject of
another task).
Now the "editor context" can be got thanks to the "web_editor.context"
JS module with its "get" function.
The "web_editor.base" module should probably not be used anymore (see
its code and recent updates).
(-) new: web.dom_ready
If a JS module should wait for the DOM to be ready to be executed, a
new JS module has been created: "web.dom_ready". This should always
be used in a module which only want to instantiate stuff. Do not
extend (or worst, include) classes after DOM ready.
(-) website.website
The "website.website" module has been split. "website.website" does not
return anything useful anymore, it just initialize some miscellaneous
stuff, without waiting for the DOM to be ready. You might want to check
"website.utils", "website.content.compatibility" or `WebsiteRoot`. Also
`website.form` has been deleted (use `this._rpc`), so has been
`website.error`. `website.prompt` will be removed in a future update to
be replaced by `Dialog.prompt`.
(-) widgets are great
Many classes which were not widgets are now widgets. This allows them to
use the 'events', the 'xmlDependencies' and the 'this._rpc' features for
example. Here are some of the main ones:
- Snippet options: these were classes with a `$el` for the menu element
and `$target` for the customized element. This is still the case
but following standard `Widget` structure (one exception: using
`this.$(...)` searches in the `$target` as before this update).
- Snippet animations: instead of class instances with a `$target`
element which can be `start` and `stop`, these are now standard
widgets which can be `start` and `destroy`. `this.$target` is
an alias to `this.$el` for ease of compatibility.
- Snippet editors: instead of class instances in charge of an editor
overlay, these are now widgets. Each "child" snippet editor is
properly attached as a "child", which allows editors to communicate
and to be properly destroyed.
(-) root widgets and website navbar
The frontend is different of the backend. In the backend, the page has
an empty <body/> element and all the components are instantiated from
parent to children (i.e. the `WebClient` is instantiated and is in
charge of instantiating the `ControlPanel`, etc). The frontend cannot
work like that on page loadings as they are way more frequent than in
the backend and we do not want them to flicker. A frontend page is
loaded as a <body/> element which already contains the website navbar
and its menus and the whole content page. JS code has to be "attached"
to these existing elements. This is possible thanks to the `RootWidget`
instances and the specialized `WebsiteRoot`, `IframeRoot` and
`WebsiteNavbar` (see code for details).
(-) lazy loading
No more (or at least a lot less) XML/JS has to be loaded on page
loading, thanks to the use of the `Widget.xmlDependencies` feature.
XML which have to be lazy loaded is loaded only on related Widget
instantiation if necessary, which allows to execute a lot of JS code
before the DOM is ready and to start many widgets on DOM ready (not
later). A visual benefit of this is clicking on the 'edit' button as
soon as it is possible: before this commit, this was sometimes not
doing anything as event handlers were not binded yet.
Still a possible exception: loading the session and locales. This may
be asynchronous stuff which is still required before widget
instantiations but this will be the subject of another task.
(-) deprecated code and code location
More than reviewing code and organizing it, many apparent dead code was
removed. More importantly, mislocated code was put in the right app.
This is the case for snippet animations which is a concept for website
apps but was defined in the web_editor app, or some translation concepts
which were part of website but should have been part of web_editor.
---
There are probably more things to say about this commit but I will let
the comments speak for those.
|
|
|
