| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
* web_editor
Commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7e2b0ebe7996c9fa35f75949b7fc8cd5a58d7c36
broke the website JS loading as it added a dependency to a lazy loaded
JS module which was not even always lazy loaded.
A test so that this does not happens anymore will be made in another
commit.
Related to task-2092386
closes odoo/odoo#39391
X-original-commit: 5ac269d722f9ff8c206215dd1c07b8544cfd5382
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
|
|
The wysiwyg abstraction layer was introduced in saas-12.2 by
commit f2969923. Its goal was to provide an external interface
for other modules that wanted to use the editor feature such
that the editor core itself could be changed without requiring
extensive changes in the other modules.
This commit is adapting the wysiwyg interface to instantiate
the 12.0 editor below it rather than the saas-12.2 one, thus
reverting the "new editor" part of f2969923 itself.
Part of PR 35677.
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Bayet <nby@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Guenet <age@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Christophe Matthieu <chm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: David Monjoie <dmo@odoo.com>
|
|
This commit reverts the saas-12.2 editor by putting back the editor
of Odoo 12.
The saas-12.2 editor was an intermediate work between the previous
editor of Odoo 12 and the new one slated for Odoo 13. It was unstable
but it was supposed to be replaced by the new editor of version 13.
However, since the new editor has been postponed to Odoo 14, the
saas-12.2 one would have been staying in Odoo 13, which would have
been a nightmare to maintain. To avoid this outcome, we chose to
put back the 12.0 editor in its place.
This has the particular advantage that Odoo 13 will share the same
bugfixes as Odoo 12 and 11 as they all run under the same core
editor, while the saas-12.2 one would have been an entirely
different beast to maintain.
This is a partial revert of f2969923.
Part of PR 35677.
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Bayet <nby@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Guenet <age@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Christophe Matthieu <chm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: David Monjoie <dmo@odoo.com>
|
|
The refactoring of the wysiwyg editor and 'html' field allows us to
move some of the code that was in web_editor but only used in website or
in mass_mailing. Some parts are still in web_editor but will be
moved at a later time.
|
|
* blog, gengo, sale
|
|
* mass_mailing, payment, point_of_sale, portal, survey, web, web_tour,
website_blog, website_crm_partner_assign, website_event,
website_event_questions, website_form, website_forum, website_gengo,
website_hr_recruitment, website_links, website_mail,
website_mail_channel, website_mass_mailing, website_quote,
website_sale, website_sale_options, website_slides, website_twitter
This commit reviews the whole "JS side" of the web_editor and website
apps. This is a first step to be able to improve them with new and
better functionnalities; this commit is not supposed to change any
visual behavior.
The main goal was to achieve a structure similar to the backend one.
Now, the frontend side also has a root widget (like the WebClient)
and all other widgets are attached to it one way or another. This allows
the benefits of using the 'trigger_up' functionnality for example.
As RPC are now mainly done with the `this._rpc` functionnality (being
possible thanks to the parent hierarchy), the frontend will also be
possible to test thanks to QUnit in a future update (besides the "text"
editor side which still requires a refactoring to be able to do that).
---
Here are some of the changes:
(-) conventions and documentation
The code has been updated to follow JS conventions and a lot of code has
been commented (around +2000 lines of comment). This also means that
lots of functions have been renamed to use camelCase or simply to make
their name understandable.
See https://github.com/odoo/odoo/wiki/Javascript-coding-guidelines.
(-) deprecated: web_editor.base
The "web_editor.base" module has been split and does not force the
modules which require it to wait for DOM ready anymore. This was indeed
slowing loading times, but also prevented to use some modules in some
contexts (see the LESS editor use in web_studio which is the subject of
another task).
Now the "editor context" can be got thanks to the "web_editor.context"
JS module with its "get" function.
The "web_editor.base" module should probably not be used anymore (see
its code and recent updates).
(-) new: web.dom_ready
If a JS module should wait for the DOM to be ready to be executed, a
new JS module has been created: "web.dom_ready". This should always
be used in a module which only want to instantiate stuff. Do not
extend (or worst, include) classes after DOM ready.
(-) website.website
The "website.website" module has been split. "website.website" does not
return anything useful anymore, it just initialize some miscellaneous
stuff, without waiting for the DOM to be ready. You might want to check
"website.utils", "website.content.compatibility" or `WebsiteRoot`. Also
`website.form` has been deleted (use `this._rpc`), so has been
`website.error`. `website.prompt` will be removed in a future update to
be replaced by `Dialog.prompt`.
(-) widgets are great
Many classes which were not widgets are now widgets. This allows them to
use the 'events', the 'xmlDependencies' and the 'this._rpc' features for
example. Here are some of the main ones:
- Snippet options: these were classes with a `$el` for the menu element
and `$target` for the customized element. This is still the case
but following standard `Widget` structure (one exception: using
`this.$(...)` searches in the `$target` as before this update).
- Snippet animations: instead of class instances with a `$target`
element which can be `start` and `stop`, these are now standard
widgets which can be `start` and `destroy`. `this.$target` is
an alias to `this.$el` for ease of compatibility.
- Snippet editors: instead of class instances in charge of an editor
overlay, these are now widgets. Each "child" snippet editor is
properly attached as a "child", which allows editors to communicate
and to be properly destroyed.
(-) root widgets and website navbar
The frontend is different of the backend. In the backend, the page has
an empty <body/> element and all the components are instantiated from
parent to children (i.e. the `WebClient` is instantiated and is in
charge of instantiating the `ControlPanel`, etc). The frontend cannot
work like that on page loadings as they are way more frequent than in
the backend and we do not want them to flicker. A frontend page is
loaded as a <body/> element which already contains the website navbar
and its menus and the whole content page. JS code has to be "attached"
to these existing elements. This is possible thanks to the `RootWidget`
instances and the specialized `WebsiteRoot`, `IframeRoot` and
`WebsiteNavbar` (see code for details).
(-) lazy loading
No more (or at least a lot less) XML/JS has to be loaded on page
loading, thanks to the use of the `Widget.xmlDependencies` feature.
XML which have to be lazy loaded is loaded only on related Widget
instantiation if necessary, which allows to execute a lot of JS code
before the DOM is ready and to start many widgets on DOM ready (not
later). A visual benefit of this is clicking on the 'edit' button as
soon as it is possible: before this commit, this was sometimes not
doing anything as event handlers were not binded yet.
Still a possible exception: loading the session and locales. This may
be asynchronous stuff which is still required before widget
instantiations but this will be the subject of another task.
(-) deprecated code and code location
More than reviewing code and organizing it, many apparent dead code was
removed. More importantly, mislocated code was put in the right app.
This is the case for snippet animations which is a concept for website
apps but was defined in the web_editor app, or some translation concepts
which were part of website but should have been part of web_editor.
---
There are probably more things to say about this commit but I will let
the comments speak for those.
|
|
Before this commit, the session object was responsible for loading the
translations in the backend only. There was then ugly code in web_editor
(which is also loaded in backend...) which was doing "if frontend then
load translations by myself". This code was also translating templates
while this is the qweb object's job. Now session is always responsible
for loading translation.
Note: the session object should be refactored/split.
|
|
There was a lost promise which made website_form loaded before the
languages informations (such as date format) was loaded.
The server expect the format of the client thus that could lead to wrong
or invalid dates.
opw-749544
closes #18074
|
|
|
|
* Adapt DOM selectors
* Refactore dialog XMLs to have odoo styling
* New editor options (background-position, ...)
* Various improvements
|
|
Each module can return a deferred. In that case, the module is marked as loaded
only when the deferred is resolved, and its value is equal to the resolved value.
The module can be rejected (unloaded). This will be logged in the console as info.
Remove if_dom_contains from the website, the modules return a rejected deferred if
the DOM doesn't contains the seleted values.
|
|
|
|
for html field) and website
|
