| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The `remaining_days` widget is intended to be used for informative purpose,
hence it should not be editable.
opw-2362276
|
|
When manually updating the time on a daterange widget, the value sent to the
server is not converted to UTC and is sent as it appears on the input.
currently daterange widget send datetime value as it is, written in input field
if manually entered, so if user set 10:00:00 so while sending data it will be
send as it is 10:00:00 so when next time record reloaded after save, it will
display 15:30:00 if timezone UTC+5:30.
Instead, change the string date to moment object with current user timezone.
so that datetime send to server is UTC time and when next time it is loaded
it adds user timezone difference, so if timezone is UTC+5:30 and user enters
10:00:00 then while sending data to server it sends 04:30:00 and when displayed
again after reload it adds +5:30 timezone difference.
LINKS
PR #50132
Task 2240378
closes odoo/odoo#59208
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
if readonly attribute is given on priority widget then priority widget should
not be clickable and hover effect should be removed so that user can easily
understand that field is readonly.
task-2339680
closes odoo/odoo#59189
X-original-commit: 53dbfc7a65a8eb2f41d6b2373cf628c4800d1f57
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
An older commit (50bf8309) had refactor part of the basic field _applyX2ManyOperations.
During this refactor, the reference field was forgotten to be included
in a condition that made the field no longer do the quick create behavior.
The name_create function in the backend was no longer called.
Adds a test for the reference field checking the call to the name_create
function and fixes the problem.
Task id 2322048
closes odoo/odoo#59013
X-original-commit: e7d4baa3d52dc73c9631365801fbe41a4d54e3a1
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Issue was spotted in list views containing the "badge" widget with
decorations (e.g. in the Purchase Order list view). At first, the
decorations were correctly applied, but they weren't anymore after
a reload (e.g. after toggling a filter).
They weren't because the list renderer didn't called
'on_attach_callback' on its subwidgets at reload (thus, 'mounted'
wasn't called on its subcomponents, and the decorations are applied
in the mounted hook).
This commit moves the logic from the FormRenderer to the
BasicRenderer, so that it applies on List, Kanban, and Form views.
This commit also removes the transition scss rule on the badge
field widget as it caused a flickering at reload.
Task 2336440
closes odoo/odoo#57762
X-original-commit: 713bce22e8f412f2c26e663b9e30fdd64933ff0c
Signed-off-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Task 2327599
It is used in the selector of a tour to know the type of a document.
|
|
This new widget allows definition of Images through static urls stored in a Char field.
It was implemented to provide a way to reduce databases footprint by using
static files instead of duplicating them in the databases (& their backups).
|
|
The document layout preview is a complete defferent simplified template
with its own css that replicates at best the different styles.
It does not have the external layout features and lack of fidelity.
The new preview actually use the real documents templates and put the
result in an iframe. It now has a high fidelity, though not perfect.
The goal is for a better onboarding, where clients see easely how
documents will look if they had an app to generate them. Of course, the
data on the document is a false invoice.
Refactor all this from base to web.
Task ID 2304177
closes odoo/odoo#56415
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
|
|
This commit adapts the BasicModel to combine calls to `default_get` and
(first) `onchange`. When creating a new record, we now only call
`onchange`, which thus return default values and potential onchange
values.
Tests (and the MockServer) have been adapted accordingly.
NOTE 1. If the `default_get` within the `onchange` returns a value for
a field that is not in the view, we ignore it, and it won't be saved.
Before, that value was kept and sent upon save. This change in behavior
may prove problematic, although the overall risk is small. Decision has
been made to keep heavy comments and code snippets if we were to revert
back somehow to the previous situation.
NOTE 2. Putting a context on a many2one field may change the value
returned by `name_get` for that field. By default, the calls to
`name_get` are done by `onchange`. If the context on a field must be
used for `name_get`, one has to set the option `always_reload` to `True`
on the field. In that case, every `onchange` that changes the value
will trigger an extra `name_get`.
NOTE 3. Suppose that a one2many field has a list view with field A, and
a form view without field A. When adding a line, we now send all known
fields (main view and inline views) to the `onchange`, which may return
a default value for A. The value will appear on the list view, but not
in the form view. The former behavior was to call `default_get` with
the fields that occur in the form view only, and therefore field A would
be left to value `False`.
NOTE 4. A test surprisingly adds an extra call to `read`. The test was
actually wrong before. With the changes in MockServer, we now correctly
receive a command `[6, false, [1]]`, whereas before we received `[1]`,
which isn't a valid command, and which was ignored. As a consequence,
an extra `read` is done, whereas the test asserts it shouldn't. But it
already didn't work before (I checked by sending the correct command).
This needs to be bugfixed elsewhere (task-id-2323491): in a o2m with a
onchange and default order records on an other page than the first
should not trigger a `read`.
Task 2261084
Co-authored-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Improve mock server:
- add support for mocked `fetch`
- add support for `active_test`
- add support for x2m `in` in domains
- add support for default values computed from a function
- implement a more natural "next id" compute
- allow initial data without ids
- ensure write and x2m commands integrity
- improve bad data/bad commands error messages
- always warn for failing RPC, not only in debug mode
- fix all existing tests that had inconsistency data
Other changes done in mail (or dependents) that are not just related to tests:
- remove `direct_partner` from formatter result
->`correspondent` can be computed from other keys, especially `members`
- fix `livechat_visitor` convertData
-> only process if there is value
- add `current_partner` and `current_user_id` as `init_messaging` result
-> easier to mock than session
- remove usage of `need_moderation`
-> that was just a search indirection to `moderation_status`
- adapt `partner_id` -> `res_partner_id` key in `_notification_format`
-> to be consistent with field name
- add name in result of `mail_partner_format`
-> sometimes display_name is not the same
- remove usage of `is_moderator`
-> that was just an indirection to `moderation_channel_ids`
Enterprise counterpart: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/11523
task-2287171
closes odoo/odoo#55854
X-original-commit: 7ba3fecb3377a720d1eb70e7515a0c45da73836d
Related: odoo/enterprise#12391
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
|
|
This commit adds smart date inputs for date and datetime fields.
The goal of smart date input is to provide the user some shortcuts
when setting dates.
The rule is [+-]\d+[dwmy]?
So we can enter inputs like:
+3 to have today + 3 days
-2w to have today - 2 weeks
+1y to have today + 1 year
+5m to have today + 5 months
-4d to have today - 4 days
closes odoo/odoo#55602
Task: 2270347
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Before this commit, user could not selecta a date before year 1900.
This was an historical limitation due to python < 3.2 that didn't
support dates before 1900.
After this commit, user can select any date, user can select any
date from 01/01/0001.
taskID: 2166761
Fixes #41788
Closes #43055
closes odoo/odoo#51406
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Follow-up of odoo/enterprise#11881, in order to eliminate all similar
typos.
The CSS pseudo-class selectors are spelled `:first-child` and
`:last-child`, and never take any argument, as opposed to
`:nth-child(<nth>)` for example.
Ref: https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/CSS/Pseudo-classes
jQuery doesn't care and matches with or without the `()`, but CSS
engines don't, and now libsass SCSS compilation crashes due to the empty
argument list (cfr. opw-2299465)
Better avoid confusion and fix the typo everywhere.
closes odoo/odoo#54685
X-original-commit: 82244e17339615615535073e6f9e1ddbcf0b57d9
Signed-off-by: Richard Mathot (rim) <rim@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
|
|
There are orm models that don't have _rec_name defined. The orm doesn't
allow creation of record via name_create if _rec_name is not defined in
the model. This commit considers this fact, such that if name_create
returns false, we don't proceed on displaying the non-existing record.
Note: _rec_name defaults to 'name' if not specified so only few models
don't have _rec_name.
closes odoo/odoo#54270
Task-id: 2285036
X-original-commit: 676c2b8e4fdf7347d44bc5afb7ca51d39338a527
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Since commit 042b4060bdbbd, attrs 'column_invisible' on button was
ignored. This commit makes this work alongside the adjacent button
grouping feature: if all adjacent buttons have their attrs
column_invisible evaluated to true, no column is rendered for this
group of adjacent buttons.
closes odoo/odoo#53489
X-original-commit: 3110e34ab8e5ec3bf7160655af21f72b4d2179db
Signed-off-by: Julien Mougenot (jum) <jum@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Before this commit, the daterangepicker always opened below the input,
even when there was not enough space to display it. Moreover, when the
user scrolled while the picker was opened, it wasn't stucked to the
input, so the picker was displayed at a random position after the
scroll.
With this commit, we compute the available space above the picker
when opening it, and if there is enough space, we display it above,
otherwise, we display it below. Moreover, we automatically close
the picker when the user scrolls.
task-2117229
closes odoo/odoo#42161
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@odoo.com>
|
|
This commit adds noLeadingZeroHour option to formatFloatTime.
The noLeadingZeroHour option can be used to format the value
like 1:30 instead of 01:30
This format behaviour is wanted for fields in web_grid module.
Task 2261853
closes odoo/odoo#52217
Related: odoo/enterprise#10870
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Hardik Prajapati <hap@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
|
|
This commit adapts tests following recent changes on the helpers.
The main change is that addMockEnvironment (and all functions using
it) are now async, as they need to wait for services to be started.
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#52826
Related: odoo/enterprise#11084
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Generally, Users are not necessarily aware that they can quick create a most
records by simply typing in their name+enter in the many2xxx field input.
The exact purpose of this commit is to make sure the user discovers the quick
create feature of our many2xxx fields.
For that, when the input is empty, display 'Start typing to create a record...'
at the bottom of the dropdown when can_create is set and no_create_edit option
not set. So the user can easily understand that by typing and pressing enter
will create the new record.
Also "Search and Create" options in the dropdown only been shown to the user
when it type anything in the input box as the same case in the "Create" option.
Task : 2266557
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
|
|
When a resequencing is done inside an object hierarchy of two
controllers, since 9b90d8727d we would call resquencing code one time
per controller.
So if for example we are in a list view inside a form view (eg. a
"Search More" modal in a form view) the resequencing would work for the
list view, but then cause traceback when it is handled by form view.
With this changeset, the first controller that get the event
`resequence_records` even gobbles it up.
Without change, added test fails because of original traceback:
Cannot read property 'res_id' of undefined@ 202 ms
Source:
TypeError: Cannot read property 'res_id' of undefined
at /web/static/src/js/views/basic/basic_controller.js:744:67
...
opw-2256818
closes #51827
closes odoo/odoo#52018
X-original-commit: eef4b99fdb9469c040af80d055933eda367b7b3d
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
|
|
The ColorpickerDialog will become a widget, this commit is only about
renaming the related XML file.
Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/46088
task-2195313
|
|
In a form view, have an x2many list with two fields A and B (e.g.
A is a many2one, and B is a char). There is an onchange on the
x2many that is triggered when the user sets A, and that sets B.
In this scenario, let's assume that the user first writes something
in B, but directly deletes it. Then, he sets A. Before this commit,
in this situation, B wasn't updated with the value returned by the
onchange.
Indeed, B's field widget was still flagged as 'isDirty', because
the user interacted with it, but it didn't commit its value, as it
hasn't actually changed. Basically, it remained flagged as 'isDirty'
forever, and thus couldn't be updated with the value returned by
the onchange.
This commit ensures that the 'isDirty' status is correctly updated
when the change is actually undone.
Task 1958793
closes odoo/odoo#51085
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: pka-odoo <pka@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@odoo.com>
|
|
In a form view, have an x2many list with two fields A and B (e.g.
A is a many2one, and B is a char). There is an onchange on the
x2many that is triggered when the user sets A, and that sets B.
In this scenario, let's assume that the user first writes something
in B, but directly deletes it. Then, he sets A. In this situation,
B isn't updated with the value returned by the onchange.
Commit [1] is an attempt to fix this, but it actually broke what
has been done in [2]. However, tests of [2] still passed, because
they didn't accurately reproduce what happens in practice (outside
the test environment).
An input field widget listens to 'input' and 'change' events. It
commits its value when both occur, but in the 'input' case, the
action is debounced with a large value (so that it actually only
commits the value on 'change', i.e. when the field is focusset
out). In the tests, the debounce value is 0, so fields actually
commit their value directly when 'input' events occur. This is
something we may want to change in the future, to remove this
discrepancy.
This commit adds a test with a large debounce value, so that we
accurately test what happens in practice, and we make sure that
this won't be broken in an attempt of fixing something else.
[1] cdca11db2ec207363df1d4fb3c87014d9c931d25
[2] a71f22370217d2da6ad13bd29c2fa412a40ebe4c
Related to task 1958793
|
|
Write something in a many2one field, and click on 'Create "..."'
to quick create a record with the given value (name_create). When
the name_create fails (e.g. because there are mandatory fields in
the model), we open a form view.
Before this commit, when this happened for many2one fields inside
x2many editable lists, it crashed, since [1].
[1] 50bf8309f88fb6c8d8e27b14d40450e92e5a4e4e
closes odoo/odoo#50948
X-original-commit: 43c513306094444ff25ad98584b426ddb8a3b525
Signed-off-by: Julien Mougenot (jum) <jum@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
This commit improves the dialog that opens when a user clicks out
of an 'un-commited' many2one. It is no longer possible to edit
the value, and the sentence has been reworded.
closes odoo/odoo#49528
Task: 2234212
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
In readonly, this widget displays the image of the related record
next to its display_name. In edit, it behaves exactly like the
regular many2one.
Part of task 2195254
|
|
This widget can be used on date and datetime fields. In readonly,
it displays the delta (in days) between the value of the field and
today. In edit, it behaves like a regular date(time) widget.
Part of task 2195254
|
|
This new field component displays the field's value inside a
bootstrap pill badge. Supported field types are 'char', 'selection'
and 'many2one'. The background color of the badge can be customized
by using the decoration-xxx mechanism, e.g.
<field name="state" decoration-danger="state == 'cancel'" widget="badge"/>
Part of task 2195254
|
|
Issue
- Install CRM
- CRM > Reports > Activities
- Add a custom filter > Created on
- Select the date
You can't, the date picker is not shown
Cause
Actually, the date picker is shown but
very quickly and it is closed by a scroll
event thrown by Chart.js.
Solution
Close the date picker only if the user
scrolls manually.
OPW-2245019
closes odoo/odoo#50482
X-original-commit: bda320052ac937f5bc17c7da81d84633d72a8370
Signed-off-by: Jason Van Malder (jvm) <jvm@odoo.com>
|
|
This commit introduces a new option in fields inheriting from type Numeric
which is `format`.
By default, Numeric fields are formatted according to their subtypes and locale
Adding, in a view, the option format set to a falsy value
will prevent the field's value from being formatted.
```
<field name="int_field" options="{\'format\': false}"/>
```
Task 2050119
|
|
A long time ago, commit [1] increased the limit of displayed badges
inside a many2many_tags widget, from 40 to 1000 (a large limit that
should never been reached with such a widget).
However, this solution was specific to the many2many_tags widget,
and didn't apply to its extensions (like the many2many_tags_email
widget). For instance, open the chatter full composer, add 40
partners in the recipients field and try to add one more: nothing
happens.
This commit sets the limit on the widget itself. That way,
extensions automatically have the same limit, and can override it
if needed.
[1] d4cf4374d1baa529bb651bb3cc32e9db140963a8
Task : 2091027
closes odoo/odoo#49488
X-original-commit: 02e41f1131b4ea3ad977cc241a3d447c37195f6e
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
before this commit: from commit: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/d58d6e270f4106d717821438490f60bc4f71306e parent context
was propagated to sub views, propagating whole context to sub view creates
issue as it contains default_* key inside it, there is a chance that sub view
has same field name which matches with default_fieldName in context,
e.g. go to sale order form view and create sale order line, while selecting
product, write in product_id field so that Create and Edit option comes,
select Create and Edit option, so whatever previously written in product_id
field will be added in product.product form's context as default_name,
now go to Purchase tab of product form and try to create Supplier, but note
that Vendors One2many should be editable, if it is not then to produce this
issue, make Vendor o2m list editable top/bottom, as soon as you click on
Vendor o2m's create button traceback generated which comes from name_get of
res.partner, issue raised because vendor o2m has m2o of res.partner and field
name is 'name', when default_get for vendor o2m is called it will propagate context
and context has default_name='typed string in product_id', as name field is
m2o with res.partner it will generate traceback as m2o accepts (id, name) tuple
not string
after this commit: propagate context to sub view but remove default_* keys
from parent context
task-2121161
closes odoo/odoo#49075
X-original-commit: 2e3756e0ce96a9e0c5fa304632a2600cbd832ef5
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
This commit does 4 things:
- adds a file for deprecated legacy fields.
- moves legacy FieldBoolean into this file.
- converts FieldBoolean to owl component.
- adds a new xml file for component fields' templates.
task id: 2193996
|
|
before this commit, email widget was not trimming value and due to which
space aroung email value remain as it is added by user.
after this commit, email widget will trim the value and remove leading/trailing
space.
task-2197432
closes odoo/odoo#47470
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Let's assume a form view with an x2many list, containing itself
an x2many field (no widget, so simply displaying the number of
records). When a record of the list is clicked, a form view
opens and displays the same sub x2many field, with widget
many2many_tags. Both list and form views of the x2many aren't
inline (thus have to be fetched on demand).
Before this commit, it crashed when the user clicked on a row
of the x2many list.
The bug has been introduced by a9cebd5a, which wrongly removed the
code handling this specific situation. At least, now we have a
test attesting that this code isn't useless.
Note that the diff isn't as scary as it looks like (we just added
an if/else, and thus indented the former code inside the else
clause).
closes odoo/odoo#48116
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
|
|
Use of the new control panel helpers to increase consistency and change the assertions
according to the new DOM/behaviour (e.g. components removed instead of turning invisible).
Part of task 2196029
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
|
|
The FieldMany2One allows to quick create record (name_create).
However, sometimes, required fields on the co-model make the
name_create crash. In this case, the FieldMany2one opens a form
view in a dialog to let the user specify those fields, and create
a new record with the 'create' method. This was working fine.
The FieldMany2ManyTags embeds a FieldMany2One to let the user
search for and select or (quick) create tags. In this case, failing
quick creation didn't fallback on the dialog form view, but
displayed a server error instead. This commit fixes this issue.
Bug introduced by 50bf8309f88fb6c8d8e27b14d40450e92e5a4e4e
Task 2192754
closes odoo/odoo#47183
X-original-commit: 63ab065f3298c13bb19ae1245d7fd2652581b254
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Let's assume a form view with a boolean field and a one2many field,
displayed for instance with widget many2many_tags. There is an
onchange on the boolean field, which populates the one2many, e.g.
[[5], [0, 0, {display_name: 'name', other_field: 'value'}]]
Before this commit, only the display_name was sent to the server on
save, because 'other_field' is unknown by the webclient.
Similar situations occurred with one2manys displayed as lists, and
onchanges returning values for fields that aren't in the list.
These situations probably didn't exist in Odoo yet, but a pending
task on website event adds one.
This commit ensures that all values returned by the onchange for
the x2many subrecords are sent back to the server when the user
saves.
closes odoo/odoo#46807
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
|
|
This commit fixes two issues that occurred in the following
situation: in a form view, have a one2many field F1 displayed as a
list, that contains another one2many field F2, displayed with
widget many2many_tags (in the list), and with a list in the form
(in the dialog). In the dialog, the list of F2 displays a
field, say 'name', which has an onchange that sets 'display_name'.
Moreover, there is an onchange in the (main) form view, that
populates F1 and F2, for instance, it returns something like: {
F1: [[5], [0, 0, {
F2: [[5], [0, 0, {
display_name: 'xxx',
name: 'xxx',
}]]
}]]
}
1) If the user opens a related record in F1, and adds (in the
dialog) a related record in F2, then validates the dialog, the
newly created record in F2 isn't correctly displayed in the
many2many_tags (the display_name is `false`), i.e. the onchange
hasn't been applied.
2) If field 'name' in F2 in the list is required, the new record
can't be saved, even if the user enters a correct value.
In both cases, the reason is that we use the incorrect viewType in
datapoints: as we don't specify that we specifically want 'list',
the 'default' one is taken, and we thus use the fieldsInfo of the
many2many_tags, which only knows field 'display_name'. As a
consequence, onchanges aren't correctly applied (issue 1), and
fields aren't correctly reset (issue 2).
Issue reported on task 2189529
|
|
When x2many fields are displayed with widgets like many2many_tags,
there is no limit on the number of related records to fetch and
display. In this case, the 'limit' attribute on the datapoints is
undefined. This could lead to weird issues when the limit is used
in computation, e.g.
var index = list.offset + list.limit; // = NaN
There are several occurrences of the above examples in the code,
which can be observed in specific scenarios, e.g. the one encoded
in the test. In this scenario, when the bug occurs, new records
added to editable list views are inserted on top (even if the list
is editable="bottom"), but the edited row is the last one.
Issue reported on task 2189529
|
|
Let's assume the following scenario in a form view:
- have a one2many field, say fieldA, displayed as a list,
containing another one2many, fieldB, (no widget, thus
displaying 'n record(s)')
- the one2many list is not editable, so there is a sub form view,
displaying fieldB as a list, and in this list some random field,
say fieldC, is displayed
- have a random field on the main form view, with an onchange to
populate the one2many
- set that random field s.t. the onchange returns something like
fieldA: [[5], [0, 0, {fieldB: [[0, 0, {fieldC: 'value'}]]}]]
- there is now a record in fieldA's list, displaying '1 record'
as value for fieldB
- click on that record to open it in a form view (dialog)
- in the dialog, in fieldB's list, we expect to have a single row
displaying 'value' as value for fieldC
Before this rev., it crashed when opening the record in the dialog,
whether the form view was inline or not.
The crash occured because fieldB was already in the list view, so
datapoints already existed for it (a list datapoint, and record
datapoints for records in the relation, in our example one record
datapoint). However, those datapoints didn't have the fieldsInfo of
the form view. When opening the form view, we added the fieldsInfo
of the form to the datapoint of the record we opened, but we didn't
recursively apply the fieldsInfo to its children. As a consequence,
when rendering the list view for fieldB in the dialog, we haven't
the information about fieldC, and it crashed.
Note that if fieldB wasn't present in fieldA's list view, it worked
fine because datapoints didn't exist before we opened the record in
the dialog.
Task 2120235
|
|
This commit trims leading and trailing spaces in search terms of
many2one.
task-2187414
closes odoo/odoo#45282
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Before this commit, the behavior of the phone widget was tested in web
as if it was always altered with module SMS
Giving wrong test results when sms module was not installed
After this commit, the separation is clearer, and the phone widget's
behavior is tested according to the modules it is altered by
closes odoo/odoo#45271
X-original-commit: 2e337516468797dd898c79c9669b5a90c83b56a7
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
|
|
Before this commit the % symbol was part of the input. We could write a
value with the % symbol to divide the value by 100 (50% = 0.5, 50 = 50)
This commit removes the % symbol from the input and adds it in a span
after the input so we do not need to write the % symbol anymore.
The value from the input will be saved as $value / 100 in database.
task-2065078
closes odoo/odoo#43995
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Before this commit, there was a discrepancy between
many2many_tags widget and regular many2many list
That is, in tag mode, when someone had read access alone on the comodel
he could modify the members of the m2m relation on the current model
Which couldn't be done in m2m list
After this commit, it is possible in a m2m list to add
records to a relation, even if we don't have CRUD access on the comodel
Task 44074
closes odoo/odoo#40194
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
With this commit, the url widget automatically prefixes the href
url by http:// if no protocol is specified, so that clicking on
the url will by default redirect to an external website.
To prevent this behavior, one can still specify the new option
'website_path: true' on the url field node in the view arch.
Thanks to this, we can remove a similar logic (only implemented on
res_partner model) which automatically altered the value saved in
database to force its 'http://' prefix.
task-2153184
closes odoo/odoo#42118
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
When the value is empty in a related field, string of the element was
displaying "false" instead of an empty string which is not what we expect.
This commit fixes that issue.
Task ID 2119333
PR #40949
|
|
Task 2123526
Before this task, the phone widget on char fields was not
displaying the send sms button by default
After this task, the default behavior of the phone
widget is to display the send sms button
|
|
By default, in readonly, unset field widgets (and their labels) are
not displayed. However, we would like the statusbar widget to be
always displayed (even when it is not set).
This commit introduces a new method 'isEmpty' on AbstractField, and
uses it (instead of isSet) to determine whether or not a field should
be hidden. By default, it uses isSet, so that it doesn't change
anything for the other fields, and we override it in statusbar to
always return false.
There was a need to make the distinction with isSet, as this one is
used to determine if a record can be saved (if the field is required,
and isSet returns false, it can't be).
task-2172272
closes odoo/odoo#43419
Related: odoo/enterprise#7929
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
|
