| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Before this rev. it was not possible to define a value for a reference field
in x2m commands as default value.
Courtesy of @kaerdsar.
Closes #24070
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before this rev., a crash occured when a default_get returned a
command 0 (CREATE) for a one2many, with a value for a date(time)
field (e.g. [0, false, {some_date_field: '2018-12-08'}]). This
was because the related values (inside the commands) weren't
parsed. This only impacted date and datetime fields, for which the
parsing converts the string into a moment instance.
Fixes #23672
|
|
Have the create_date field displays on a one2many list
Try to add a record onto the list
Before this commit, when the virtual record is added onto the list
it crashes because the datetime field is undefined and cannot be parsed
After this commit, It doesn't crash though the value would have to wait the save on the main record
to be updated (because it is the create_date)
OPW 1834250
closes #24097
|
|
In a kanban grouped by many2one with a progressbar, after emptying a column
by moving all records, the column wasn't correctly updated. This was causing,
in the best case, a record duplication or, in the worst case, a traceback.
This issue comes from the fact that, with a progressbar, a read_group is
performed each time a record is moved. When the group (column) becomes empty,
the read_group won't return this group even though the group still appears in
the kankan. When moving back the record in this empty column, there is a
desynchronization between the kanban controller data and the model.
To fix this issue, an option `keepEmptyGroups` is passed when performing the
mentioned read_group ; this mimics the kanban display that keeps empty groups
displayed and there is no desync anymore.
Fixes #23982
|
|
The keyboard shortcut branch recently added a method
updateModifiersValue on the widget class, which is used to make a widget
aware of its modifier status (in particular, if it is required). This
is necessary for the proper navigation behaviour on field widgets, but
should not be on the widget class.
The proper fix is, in my opinion, to introduce a AbstractViewWidget
class which would be used for AbstractField and all custom widgets in
views.
Meanwhile, this commit simply protects the call to that method. This is a
refactoring, but can be merged in saas-11.3.
|
|
1. Added the ability to navigate within the List view using UP and
DOWN keys.
2. By defaults, the focus should be set on the search input field.
3. From the search input field, using the DOWN key, the focus goes
to the list
4. From the search input field, using TAB key, the focus goes to the
create button
5. From the create/import buttons, using TAB or DOWN key goes to the
first row of the list, then UP and DOWN keys moves the focus from
item to item in the list.
6. When on a row, hitting ENTER opens the view of that row.
Also in this commit
1. When on the first row, hitting the UP key does nothing
2. When on the last row, hitting the DOWN key does nothing
Not included in this commit
1. Memorize the position on the list when opening an row, than
restoring when going back to that list
2. Navigation on grouped list using the keyboard
|
|
The goal of this commit is to allow fast entry of the same model using
the keyboard for navigating through the form once, by blocking the user
from advancing in the form if there is a required field or once they
went through the form once to get them to a primary action (button)
This commit includes the following changes
1) Enable moving forward from field to field using the TAB key
2) Entering the one to many and many to many using the TAB key
a. When entering it, set the focus on the "add new line" link or
button
b. When adding a new line, set the focus on the field visible
editable field of the new line
c. Discard adding a new line with ESC key
d. If the user leaves the first field empty and uses TAB, we
will cancel the adding of a new line and move to the next
field of the form
3) When a field is required and not filled in, do not allow the user
to move out of the field using the TAB key (the user is still
allowed to use the mouse though), mark the field as invalid
instead
4) After going though the form once, using the TAB key on the last
field will move the focus to the first primary button of the page
5) When the focus is on a primary button (EDIT/SAVE), the user cannot
move the focus forward using the TAB key. Hitting TAB again will
display a tooltip telling to hit ENTER to activate the button.
The mouse is still available to move the focus.
6) When the user saves, the focus is placed on the first primary
button of the form renderer (like VALIDATE for a new invoice)
7) On dialogs, primary buttons should stop the users from moving out
of them, and showing a popup if the user tries
8) When closing a dialog, the focus will be moved back to the widget
that opened it.
This commit does not include the following features
1) Navigation with the keyboard on a selection one to man
2) Navigate between tabs in a form using the keyboard
3) Cancelling the adding of a new line in a many to many using the
ESC key do not set the focus correctly
4) Enhancing the focusses fields (like blue underline)
|
|
|
|
Before this commit, when some records were created from an `onchange`,
we have the following weird behaviour:
Suppose that this record has some required fields that are empty.
When we click on this record, then somewhere else, the record
disappears from the list.
This is because the records contains invalid fields, and it is wrongfully
assuming that the record to be discarded comes from "Add an item".
A previous commit [1] fixed a bit this issue with `default_get`, but since
it relied on a fragile heuristic, we decide to apply the correct fix with
this commit.
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/b09f0c99be2b13d33986414485556d87da186d65
|
|
- Create a vendor bill, save and validate
- Duplicate the bill, save
- Click on "Create"
A customer invoice is created, while the user expects a vendor bill.
After duplication, the new record is loaded but the context is lost.
Since the default value for the invoice type is based on the context key
`type`, a loss of context leads to an incorrect invoice type.
opw-1826453
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
|
|
Before this commit, some breaking spaces were present in the js code.
Such spaces are misinterpreted and worked by luck.
This has become a problem with exported js bunldes (e.g. the
external_lib bundle in im_livechat).
This commit replaces breaking spaces by regular spaces.
|
|
This rev. refactors the way the view's arch is parsed in BasicView,
so that it can be extended specifications of the BasicView to
handle other tagnames that 'field' (which is basically the only
one handled in BasicView).
|
|
Have a form view with a O2M.
The model at the 'many' end has a reference field
Have a record of the second model display in a modal
(by clicking on a record in the o2m list)
Before this commit:
The field reference was not filled up
This was because the fields to fetch on the modal creation weren't correctly set.
Obvisouly, it also created problem when trying to change the record on the modal:
spawning tracebacks because the reference field was not present in the local datas
After this commit:
The display of the reference field is as expected both in the original form and in the modal
OPW 1829822
closes #22468
closes #23896
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have a list with readonly modifiers on at least one column.
Have the first record of the list be readonly as computed by the modifier
Create and edit a second record
Enter a value in the cell and hit TAB
Before this commit:
The focus on the targetted cell was lost and the rendering of the cell was in mode readonly
This was because the baseMode of the modifier dict was applied to one and only one node (== one column) and hence to *all* the records
After this commit:
The rendering and keyboard TAB navigation works as expected in the list editable
The baseMode concept has been sharpened and each cell now has one
OPW-1816569
OPW-1824979
closes #23809
closes #22859
closes #23436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have a model with a m2m (field A)
this m2m has also a m2m (and displayed as m2m tags in the view) (field AA)
Have a domain on field A, to trigger the search view selection
Click on add an item
Select everything in the modal, making sure that there is more than 40 records
Click on Select
Before this commit:
There was a traceback indicating the local data did not contain records >= 40
This was because the internal data repository was constrained by a limit
After this commit:
We adapt the limit of the local data repository and there is not traceback
OPW 1823400
|
|
When we discard an element, we want to make sure that the new state is
not corrupted by previous user operations. In our case, we possibly had
a limit and an offset values modified by the user.
This could lead to unpleasant situations, with incorrect data displayed
on the form view.
Note that this actually fixes a new bug introduced by commit
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/e7fab234201e357da52c3576ad2e8fc9ceee9359
(this is the commit that introduces the tempLimitIncrement attribute)
|
|
A big problem with the o2m edition happens when the user has a full page
(so, in general, 40 records) and click on add.
If the o2m is in editable="bottom" mode (which is actually a really
common usecase), then the next record will be added at the end.
However, since we have a limit of 40, it will immediately go to the next
page.
The effect is even weirder when there is a required field in the tree
view. In that case, the new record appears correctly, the user can edit
it, then, as soon as the required fields are set, it will immediately
disappear from the current screen.
In this commit, we have a really simple solution: we simply increase the
limit in this case. An interesting thing is that it is actually temporary:
when the user goes to the next page, the limit is back to its original
value (due to the pager click: it resets the value to what the pager knows).
|
|
In multi pages list view, the scroll position is reset to top when
the user switches between pages. This wasn't working if he first
reset the limit, and then switched between pages.
|
|
This rev. improves the way the scroll position is restored when
coming back to a view (e.g. open a kanban view, scroll, click on a
record to open it in a form view, go back to kanban using the
breadcrumbs):
- generalize the scroll position handling from web_enterprise to
web to make it available in the community webclient as well
- also restore left scroll position, not only top (especially
useful for grouped Kanban views with a lot of columns)
- handle the case where the scrolling area is a sub element of
the view (e.g. the grouped Kanban view in mobile).
Task 34037
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Ankit Sathvara <asa@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
This could (should?) be considered a refactoring, but this is actually
trying to restore lost functionality. In v10, the custom form widgets
were created with access to the node element that define them. We lost
that in v11, with the new views.
However, it is actually very useful for generic widgets. Since this is
not really a risky fix, I think that it can be done in 11.0.
Note: this feature was already reintroduced in master in commit
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/b7aa439826df6b3e442b3f60bb593ff28efc8679
|
|
|
|
Before this rev., the field widget 'mail_activity' kept an internal
cache of fetched activities (like the 'mail_thread' and
'mail_followers'). However, for activities, this cache may cause
issues.
For instance, create a new lead in 'My pipeline', schedule a
'Meeting' activity on that lead (it opens the Calendar view so
that real meetings can be created), create a meeting 2 weeks from
now, go back to the lead form view: the activity still diplays that
the meeting is today (when the view is refreshed, the correct date
is displayed).
This rev. removes the internal cache for this field widget, as the
activities can easily be updated in business flows (unlike messages
or followers).
This rev. also fixes a bug in the BasicModel, where the res_ids of
a list datapoint was altered in place to return a list of x2many
commands instead of the list of ids when being stringified. This
caused a traceback when opening a lead with activities, as soon
as the internal cache had been removed.
|
|
A crash occured in several Studio tests that have just been
forwardported to saas-11.2, because of a line that hadn't been
adapted in rev. cb339842 (technically, the previous code was
correct, but it crashed when viewInfo.fields was undefined, which
doesn't happen outside the tests environment).
|
|
some objects-
)
|
|
Before this fix, when a _callButtonAction failed, it would reload the model.
After this fix we will not reload if a _callButtonAction fails
|
|
|
|
In some cases, the footer in a form view dialog could be duplicated.
The reason was that the form view was rerendered completely, footer
included, by the renderer, out of the formcontroller control (it is the
formcontroller's job to move the footer buttons to the footer).
A possible fix is to work on the form renderer to make it aware that the footer
buttons are expected to be only rendered once, but it has the disadvantage to
be a fix specific to this issue, and any other form view behaviour with some
side effects may have the same issue.
This commit tries to prevent the form view from rerendering itself
completely in those cases. This also has the disadvantage of possibly
not being a complete fix, if some edge cases are missed. However, I
have the feeling that we still want to avoid rerendering the full view
if possible.
|
|
Before this rev., it crashed when trying to create records of the
res.users model. This is due to commit ad1cceb.
The 'default_get' of 'res.users' always returns a value for field
'groups_id', whereas the docstring of 'default_get' states that it
only returns default values for fields given in arguments.
Rev. ad1cceb changed a bit the way the result of 'default_get' was
processed, by iterating over the values instead of over the fields
in the view. So, before ad1cceb, 'groups_id' was simply ignored,
and after, the BasicModel tried to process it and it crashed when it
attempted to retrieve its fieldsInfo, as this field isn't in the
view.
This rev. restores the previous behavior.
Fixes #23303
Fixes #23305
|
|
Let's assume a one2many displayed over several pages with a default
order such that a record, say R, that would normally be on page 1
is actually on another page. Moreover, there is an onchange on that
one2many which converts all commands 4 (LINK_TO) into commands 1
(UPDATE), which is standard in the ORM.
When the first line of the one2many was edited, the record R was
fully loaded, whereas it shouldn't have been (as it is not on the
current page). So basically, a useless read was performed.
Moreover, if there was an x2many field in the one2many list, a
crash occurred because relational data of R that shouldn't have
been read wasn't postprocessed by the BasicModel.
The useless read occurred because the one2many subrecords weren't
correctly sorted before checking if some of them/some of their
fields should be read. This is not the case anymore.
OPW-1816800
|
|
|
|
Let's assume a one2many list view inside a form view, displaying
a single char field A. There is an onchange on the form view
returning a command 0 (CREATE) for the one2many. The command 0 only
specifies a value for field A. The one2many list isn't editable, so
when a sub-record is clicked, it is open in a form view (in a
dialog). In this form view, an x2many field B is displayed in a sub
list or kanban view.
Before this rev., it crashed when the user tried to open the
created one2many sub-record (returned by the onchange) in the form
view, because of the presence of the x2many field B, which wasn't
correctly processed by the BasicModel (its value was undefined,
whereas it must be a valid, empty, dataPoint).
Moreover, the limit of the x2many field B wasn't set, so a pager
was displayed as soon as it contained at least one record.
Fixes #22050
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before this rev., when an onchange returned a command 6 for an
x2many field, it was completely ignored by the BasicModel.
|
|
When onchange RPCs return a command 4 (LINK TO), the res_id of the
record to link is given, and the BasicModel has to read the fields
in the view for that record. When one of those fields is an x2many
(for instance, displayed with widget many2many_tags), the
subrecords in the relation must be read as well (at least their
display_name).
Before this rev., this last part wasn't done by the BasicModel, and
as a consequence, the many2many_tags widget was always empty, even
though there were records in the relation.
Same thing applied to reference fields, but this is way more
uncommon.
This rev. ensures that x2manys and reference fields are correctly
fetched in this scenario.
|
|
Before this commit, there is an issue with one2many lists with records that
have been created on 'default_get': if the record has a required field that
is empty, when the user clicks on this empty required field and then somewhere
else, the record is removed from the list.
The cause of this bug is that these records have invalid field changes, here
the required field that is empty. As a consequence, it checks whether the
record is "new", and if so, removes it visually from the editable list.
(Note: a record is "new" when it is not stored in DB).
This behaviour is expected when discarding records created from "Add an item".
However, that is not intended for records that have been created as default
items of the list. These records are still considered as "new" items, because
they are not stored in DB, but they should stay in the list on discard.
This commit solves the issue by making an additional check before assuming
that the record for which we discard changes comes from "Add an item":
if the record in the list has been created before user interacts on the list
(in other words, the record has been added in the list when the user accesses
it), then we should not remove the record from the list, even though the record
has some invalid fields from the savepoint (e.g. empty required).
opw-806650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the <widget> tag is not used anymore in any of our views, it was
not really properly supported. In particular, the form widget was not
notified when the state of the form view has changed, which makes it
very difficult to actually do any useful work.
With this commit, we make sure that the widget method 'updateState' (if
it exists) is called with the new state whenever it changed.
This should allow developers to do useful work without having to work
around the issue. Note that this is not really a perfect solution, since
the updateState methot may or may not have been implemented.
I think that we need some kind of ViewWidget abstraction, which could be
used to have a better and more complete API for widgets in a basic view.
And AbstractField could inherit from ViewWidget.
|
