| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
has a country
- Change the company's country to Finland;
- Go to Contacts and click on Create;
- Tick the Company box above the Name field;
- Start typing into the Name field;
- Click on a company with a VAT number under its name.
Before this commit, a Traceback appears. This occurs because the
response of the request with the suggested company has the fields
'company_name' and 'company_code' and these fields are not in
res_partner.
Now, the suggested company is parsed to correctly field the country
field.
opw-2049636
closes odoo/odoo#35631
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the calendar view
In the partner filter in the calendar side bar
type something, and backspace rapidly to remove everything
Before this commit, there was a error because the framework tried to write something
in the corresponding field
This was because the o2m field was not initialized
with the correct values
After this commit, there is no error
OPW 2043975
closes odoo/odoo#35330
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
|
|
Let's assume a one2many field (editable list) in a form view with
a many2many (e.g. many2many_tags), and an onchange on the one2many
such that, when a row is added to the relation, the server returns
update commands for (a subset of) the records being already in the
relation. For thoses updated records, the many2many field needs to
be read (the onchange only returns the ids in the relation).
Before this rev., the many2many field was read independently for
each record in the one2many. This could cause a performance issue
on large relations. For instance, this was the case on
account.invoice records with a lot of lines.
This commit must be forwardported up to 12.2, not further.
Issue 2027356
closes odoo/odoo#34771
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
|
|
|
|
Have a list view, apply a group_by and a filter with a sort parameter
Click on one record to access the form view
Have a x2m within it
Before this commit, the x2m records were loaded with a context containing
the keys orderedBy and group_by
It seems harmless at first, but even conceptually those keys should not be here
- they apply on a list of records, and not to individual ones
- they may contain field names not existing in the x2m model
Hence, when accessing another list view through an action button, the list
will try to be orderedBy or group_by with the given context
Which is plain wrong in the first place and may cause crashes
After this commit, the context of a record datapoint (representing a single record)
is stripped from the keys
Read the opw for a concrete use case
OPW 1943583
closes odoo/odoo#31706
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
Most operations on X2Many widget possibly propagates a field context
(name_create, name_search, ...) but the original read or read on an
onchange does not.
With this changeset, the field context is also used in these instances.
The assertions added in the added test failed with:
expected: ["world"], result: [undefined]
expected: ["world","world"], result: [undefined,undefined]
fixes #29203
opw-1914466
closes #29866
|
|
|
|
Fine-tuning of commit e7fab234201e357da52c3576ad2e8fc9ceee9359
In a one2many with more than one page with a limit of k records, add a line l.
It increments the list limit to k+1. Remove a line above (of index <= k).
It will try to load a line l' to replace it, that it will find on page 2.
However when deciding if it should read missing fields on that record, it will
scan at most u records, skipping virtual ids.
Here u is the min between the current number of lines and the list limit
without the temporary increase due to the added record.
Since there are at least two pages, u = k.
However since l is in the list at index k, then l' won't be read, and since it
was on page 2 its data hasn't been loaded.
Therefore the js would traceback when trying to evaluate it.
opw 1913361
closes odoo/odoo#29338
|
|
Use case: a x2m (ex: attribute values) displayed in a x2m (ex: attributes on
product) using different fields in different views (ex: tags in product form view
and list in product attribute form view). When opening the x2m record (in a
wizard) then going back on the form view, the tags are empty because the
`display_name` value has been lost when fetching x2m for the second time.
In this case, the list `fieldsInfo` needs to be updated with the existing
(default for tags) one so all the fields will be correctly loaded.
Task 1916891
closes odoo/odoo#29598
|
|
|
|
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086
closes odoo/odoo#29172
closes odoo/odoo#29086
|
|
|
|
Have:
- Model A with a x2m to model B
- Object A with multiple objects B in x2m (that will be sorted)
- On the list view of model A, click on a column to sort by a field
- this field shall not exist in B
- open a record A (towards form view)
Before this commit, the sorting of the x2m crashed, because the key orderedBy was propagated
Due to commit e713ed2a69af9fe97fbe2d54843adc8f1ce689aa
After this commit, it doesn't crash
OPW 1913133
closes odoo/odoo#29094
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to: #28446
On a pure list view, click on a column to sort the records by that field.
Save the filter as favorite
Reload, now apply the filter
Before this commit, there were two issues:
1. The order of the list was never propagated to search view, which couldn't save
the filter with its attribute "sort"
2. There was no mechanism to load the attribute sort from a loading Filter
After this commit, those two issues are corrected
Unfortunately, complex search view flows are not testable in v11.0
OPW 1906968
closes odoo/odoo#28766
|
|
Steps:
- open a modal form view from tree view first line and make a change
- open a modal from the second line and make a change
- open the second line back: the change were lost
In a given number of conditions (a many2one inside the form view, there
is a one2many in the form view not inside the tree view, ....) this
happened because:
- when we save the first line, we get onchange data for the second one
- this onchange data can't be applied before second line is loaded, but
it is saved so it can be applied if second line is ever opened
- when the second line is opened the saved change is applied => OK
- when the second line is opened a second time the saved change is
applied again, possibly overwriting posterious change => BAD
With this changeset, when the record with unapplied onchange is loaded
for the first time, the unapplied onchange is applied only once.
Added test without the change failed with:
- only 1 turtle for second partner (result: 0 not 1)
- second partner turtle is Michelangelo (result: "" not "Michelangelo")
opw-1846820
closes #28644
|
|
Before this rev., the following scenario didn't work:
Open manufacturing order and click on Produce button (note that
bom product should have Serial number enabled) then add quantity
in Done field in o2m and press Record Production button in wizard,
it will produce UserError and after then if you change Lot number
field in wizard's o2m then the many2one value doesn't get selected.
This occured because the renderer wasn't updated after the RPC fail
and thus still got an outdated version of the state.
The issue raised after commit: 02eef78bbd3 which was done to remove
useless rpc call, it's OK to remove rpc call but let's keep
updating renderer.
Related to task ID: #1852715
Co-authored-by: Tejas Shahu <tsh@odoo.com>
|
|
Define a x2m tree view with a default_sort including more than 1 field to order the list against
Before this commit, the second field was never used
After this commit, it is used
OPW 1909785
closes odoo/odoo#28840
|
|
For many2one fields, 'default_get' only returns the id, whereas
'onchange' (like 'read') returns an array with id and display_name.
Before this rev., when creating a new record, we always called
'name_get' for all many2ones, whether or not their value was
obtained by 'default_get' or 'onchange', i.e. even if their
display_name was already known.
It may just look like unnecessary RPCs, but those RPCs could
actually cause a crash when the user has access to the main model
(and thus can access the display_name of the many2one thanks to
related sudo), but doesn't have access to the many2one comodel.
closes odoo/odoo#30892
|
|
When editing a record, if it cannot be saved (b.e. due to required
fields) and the user clicks on save, then on discard
Before this fix, the window did nothing (seems like it is unresponsive)
After this fix, the user is able to discard the form.
task-id: 1937142
closes odoo/odoo#30871
|
|
Create record A on form view, on which a dynamic domain is added by an onchange.
Switch to kanban view. Quick create a record B. Click edit.
This sends you to the complete form view to edit the record.
The dynamic domain of A is still applied.
When discarding the changes, the _domains attribute was not reset.
Example of a model on which this flow can be reproduced is helpdesk.ticket,
with _onchange_partner_project providing the new _domain.
test courtesy of @aab-odoo
opw 1920874
closes odoo/odoo#30308
|
|
Before this rev., there was a race condition when the user did
some changes on a form view (triggering an onchange), saved and
clicked on the breadcrumbs to leave the form view (before the
onchange returned). As a consequence, the dialog telling the user
that there are pending changes was displayed. This mostly occured
on the main_flow_tour since the removal of an unnecessary check,
and could be reproduced manually on a slow network.
Basically, the check if there were pending changes was done too
early (before the view was actually saved).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have a one2many display records in a kanban subview,
which opens a form view when edited.
Edit a field displayed only on the form view.
A call to _applyX2ManyChange is done without giving it the viewtype argument,
therefore the fieldinfo is taken from the wrong view, traceback ensues.
opw 1914163
closes odoo/odoo#29607
|
|
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086
closes odoo/odoo#29172
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a view is loaded, it checks which fields it has to load.
In the case of a many2one, it could be the case that a context key is present in
one view and not in the other; if it happens, we should reload the data, as a
name_get result could vary.
opw 1891295
closes odoo/odoo#28298
|
|
Before this commit, when loading the data and calling the prostprocess,
the viewType was not correctly passed which could lead to broken
behaviour. For example, if one was to load a record from a list view
embedded in a form view, the viewtype passed was the list which
prevented to load the data from the form view.
OPW 1891295
closes odoo/odoo#28279
|
|
|
|
The parameter would not be correctly detected by doc extractors
closes odoo/odoo#28169
|
|
|
|
|
|
Image field widget need the __last_update field alongside them
for caching purposes, though that field should never be present explicitly
in the views
Before this commit, the dependencies of field widgets were not merged into
the model's fields definition, creating a traceback when adding an image field widget
into a x2many list
After this commit, there is no traceback and the image field works properly
closes #27545
|
|
Commit:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/818c18e55d0718286ff5bf332186a10f4d7a58ef
Updated the resequence logic in a way that was almost falser than before.
The added test however did work by coincidence, as index values were equal to
the sequence field values.
To be sure that we synchronize with what happens on the server, we do a read
after the resequence.
Additionnally, we take into account the result of the server resequence return;
if it is false, it means no resequencing happened, so we should not do a read.
opw 1867049
closes odoo/odoo#27184
|
|
|
|
|
|
extra fields
Suppose you are editing a SO to add a new line. Depending on the configuration,
a sale order line wizard may open (e.g. if packages are activated).
This wizard is a form view, opened from the tree view of the sale order lines.
We have commit 8e5156938a9c87b80512bff9ecd025891406e624
that adds extra fields from the originating view.
(However it doesn't work if the other view is inlined, so we modify this part to
add the extra field even in this case.)
Then we need the field info from the origin view in the target view;
we do so by extending the former with the content of the latter.
opw 1904337
closes odoo/odoo#28441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before this commit, the compute sequence was relying on the fact the ID was used
as a secondary order key to get the right result.
This is necessary when adding items between pages because we don't resequence
the following elements.
However this was not necessary when adding new elements on the last page since
there are no following elements to resesquence in that case.
PR: #27639
|
