| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Active currencies are given in session_info, in the page source.
When the user activated a new currency, he had to reload the page
to make the browser aware of that new currency (without reloading,
there was no currency symbol displayed next to the amounts).
This rev. forces a reload of the currencies each time a currency is
edited.
Task #1838654
closes odoo/odoo#31192
|
|
This rev. defines a searchPanel widget used in Kanban views to
refine search according to specific dimensions. This wigdet is
displayed as a sidebar to the left of the kanban view.
Part of task 1892462
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
For many2one fields, 'default_get' only returns the id, whereas
'onchange' (like 'read') returns an array with id and display_name.
Before this rev., when creating a new record, we always called
'name_get' for all many2ones, whether or not their value was
obtained by 'default_get' or 'onchange', i.e. even if their
display_name was already known.
It may just look like unnecessary RPCs, but those RPCs could
actually cause a crash when the user has access to the main model
(and thus can access the display_name of the many2one thanks to
related sudo), but doesn't have access to the many2one comodel.
closes odoo/odoo#30892
|
|
When editing a record, if it cannot be saved (b.e. due to required
fields) and the user clicks on save, then on discard
Before this fix, the window did nothing (seems like it is unresponsive)
After this fix, the user is able to discard the form.
task-id: 1937142
closes odoo/odoo#30871
|
|
Before this rev., the context specified on an x2many fields (in the
arch) wasn't fully propagated to the subrecords. This means that it
couldn't be used, e.g., in the template of the sub kanban view (see
parent commit).
PR: #30881
|
|
|
|
Create record A on form view, on which a dynamic domain is added by an onchange.
Switch to kanban view. Quick create a record B. Click edit.
This sends you to the complete form view to edit the record.
The dynamic domain of A is still applied.
When discarding the changes, the _domains attribute was not reset.
Example of a model on which this flow can be reproduced is helpdesk.ticket,
with _onchange_partner_project providing the new _domain.
test courtesy of @aab-odoo
opw 1920874
closes odoo/odoo#30308
|
|
Before this rev., there was a race condition when the user did
some changes on a form view (triggering an onchange), saved and
clicked on the breadcrumbs to leave the form view (before the
onchange returned). As a consequence, the dialog telling the user
that there are pending changes was displayed. This mostly occured
on the main_flow_tour since the removal of an unnecessary check,
and could be reproduced manually on a slow network.
Basically, the check if there were pending changes was done too
early (before the view was actually saved).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most operations on X2Many widget possibly propagates a field context
(name_create, name_search, ...) but the original read or read on an
onchange does not.
With this changeset, the field context is also used in these instances.
The assertions added in the added test failed with:
expected: ["world"], result: [undefined]
expected: ["world","world"], result: [undefined,undefined]
fixes #29203
opw-1914466
closes #29866
|
|
|
|
Fine-tuning of commit e7fab234201e357da52c3576ad2e8fc9ceee9359
In a one2many with more than one page with a limit of k records, add a line l.
It increments the list limit to k+1. Remove a line above (of index <= k).
It will try to load a line l' to replace it, that it will find on page 2.
However when deciding if it should read missing fields on that record, it will
scan at most u records, skipping virtual ids.
Here u is the min between the current number of lines and the list limit
without the temporary increase due to the added record.
Since there are at least two pages, u = k.
However since l is in the list at index k, then l' won't be read, and since it
was on page 2 its data hasn't been loaded.
Therefore the js would traceback when trying to evaluate it.
opw 1913361
closes odoo/odoo#29338
|
|
Use case: a x2m (ex: attribute values) displayed in a x2m (ex: attributes on
product) using different fields in different views (ex: tags in product form view
and list in product attribute form view). When opening the x2m record (in a
wizard) then going back on the form view, the tags are empty because the
`display_name` value has been lost when fetching x2m for the second time.
In this case, the list `fieldsInfo` needs to be updated with the existing
(default for tags) one so all the fields will be correctly loaded.
Task 1916891
closes odoo/odoo#29598
|
|
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#30045
|
|
Before this commit, we don't assure fetch's deferreds were resolved to
return _readGroup. Thus, in some conditions, kanban was rendered before
records data was updated so many2many tags could be missing.
Now, we return _readGroup when fetch's deferreds were resolved.
Task #1910805
closes odoo/odoo#29508
|
|
This branch introduces a large-scale reorganization of the
component tree generated by the web client. The short version is
that now, the control panel is a child of the view controller and
no longer a sibling. Graphically (and simplified), we go from
this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
/ \
controlPanel viewController
/ \
to this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
|
viewController
/ | \
ControlPanelController
/ \
CPRenderer CPModel
The motivation is that this work moves the code where it should be.
Before this commit, it was kind of weird to have code in the
controllers to render buttons outside of their root node (in
renderButtons). Also, the action manager had to take care of
coordinating search view states between view transitions.
So, this work simplifies the code. It also makes it easier to
extend. We see day after day that Odoo needs to take care of more
complex UI needs, and in many cases, these needs were quite
difficult to implement (we prefer spaghettis in our plates, not in
our code). The changes in this branch should open the way to
implement these features.
For example,
- it will now be easy to add the possibility of views (for example,
the search view or a new ControlPanel view) to add custom buttons
(of type action or object) in the control panel.
- Another need will be to serialize/ restore the state of the
search view across action boundaries (needed by the dashboard).
- Another example is the possibility for views to customize easily
the presence/absence of sub menus (filters/groupbys/favorites/
time range/...)
- Another need is an easier way for views/client action to customize
their control panel.
This commit also contains a large rewrite of the search view (so it
is more inline with our architecture and easier to maintain).
Part of task 1893568
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
Have a one2many display records in a kanban subview,
which opens a form view when edited.
Edit a field displayed only on the form view.
A call to _applyX2ManyChange is done without giving it the viewtype argument,
therefore the fieldinfo is taken from the wrong view, traceback ensues.
opw 1914163
closes odoo/odoo#29607
|
|
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086
closes odoo/odoo#29172
closes odoo/odoo#29086
|
|
|
|
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086
closes odoo/odoo#29172
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have:
- Model A with a x2m to model B
- Object A with multiple objects B in x2m (that will be sorted)
- On the list view of model A, click on a column to sort by a field
- this field shall not exist in B
- open a record A (towards form view)
Before this commit, the sorting of the x2m crashed, because the key orderedBy was propagated
Due to commit e713ed2a69af9fe97fbe2d54843adc8f1ce689aa
After this commit, it doesn't crash
OPW 1913133
closes odoo/odoo#29094
|
|
|
|
Before this commit, the web client evaluated all modifiers
(readonly/invisible/required) in some cases, even if it only needed one
of them. This is clearly not optimal, and I even suppose that for large o2m,
it could even have a noticeable effect on web client perceived speed
This commit simply make sure that we evaluate only what we need in those
cases. Note that it is not really a testable improvement, hence the
lack of tests.
closes odoo/odoo#29171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to: #28446
On a pure list view, click on a column to sort the records by that field.
Save the filter as favorite
Reload, now apply the filter
Before this commit, there were two issues:
1. The order of the list was never propagated to search view, which couldn't save
the filter with its attribute "sort"
2. There was no mechanism to load the attribute sort from a loading Filter
After this commit, those two issues are corrected
Unfortunately, complex search view flows are not testable in v11.0
OPW 1906968
closes odoo/odoo#28766
|
|
Steps:
- open a modal form view from tree view first line and make a change
- open a modal from the second line and make a change
- open the second line back: the change were lost
In a given number of conditions (a many2one inside the form view, there
is a one2many in the form view not inside the tree view, ....) this
happened because:
- when we save the first line, we get onchange data for the second one
- this onchange data can't be applied before second line is loaded, but
it is saved so it can be applied if second line is ever opened
- when the second line is opened the saved change is applied => OK
- when the second line is opened a second time the saved change is
applied again, possibly overwriting posterious change => BAD
With this changeset, when the record with unapplied onchange is loaded
for the first time, the unapplied onchange is applied only once.
Added test without the change failed with:
- only 1 turtle for second partner (result: 0 not 1)
- second partner turtle is Michelangelo (result: "" not "Michelangelo")
opw-1846820
closes #28644
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before this rev., the following scenario didn't work:
Open manufacturing order and click on Produce button (note that
bom product should have Serial number enabled) then add quantity
in Done field in o2m and press Record Production button in wizard,
it will produce UserError and after then if you change Lot number
field in wizard's o2m then the many2one value doesn't get selected.
This occured because the renderer wasn't updated after the RPC fail
and thus still got an outdated version of the state.
The issue raised after commit: 02eef78bbd3 which was done to remove
useless rpc call, it's OK to remove rpc call but let's keep
updating renderer.
Related to task ID: #1852715
Co-authored-by: Tejas Shahu <tsh@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
extra fields
Suppose you are editing a SO to add a new line. Depending on the configuration,
a sale order line wizard may open (e.g. if packages are activated).
This wizard is a form view, opened from the tree view of the sale order lines.
We have commit 8e5156938a9c87b80512bff9ecd025891406e624
that adds extra fields from the originating view.
(However it doesn't work if the other view is inlined, so we modify this part to
add the extra field even in this case.)
Then we need the field info from the origin view in the target view;
we do so by extending the former with the content of the latter.
opw 1904337
closes odoo/odoo#28441
|
|
Define a x2m tree view with a default_sort including more than 1 field to order the list against
Before this commit, the second field was never used
After this commit, it is used
OPW 1909785
closes odoo/odoo#28840
|
|
|
|
When a view is loaded, it checks which fields it has to load.
In the case of a many2one, it could be the case that a context key is present in
one view and not in the other; if it happens, we should reload the data, as a
name_get result could vary.
opw 1891295
closes odoo/odoo#28298
|
|
Before this commit, when loading the data and calling the prostprocess,
the viewType was not correctly passed which could lead to broken
behaviour. For example, if one was to load a record from a list view
embedded in a form view, the viewtype passed was the list which
prevented to load the data from the form view.
OPW 1891295
closes odoo/odoo#28279
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add an 'enableRelationalFetch' option in _readGroup who force to make
only one rpc for x2m and reference fields.
Usefull to avoid useless (and blocking when too numerous) rpcs (tags
field in a kanban view for example).
Task #1878113 (2/2)
closes odoo/odoo#27731
|
|
The parameter would not be correctly detected by doc extractors
closes odoo/odoo#28169
|
|
|
