| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It is sometimes useful to be able to customize slightly the color of a
field depending on some conditions on the current record.
For example, imagine that we want to show a VAT number field in green/red, if
it was validated or not. To do that, we can add a field with an
onchange, and simply add decoration-danger and decoration-success
attributes to the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have a model A with a o2m to B.
In the list have a field B > m2o > C
Also have a sequence field (widget handle) on B
Then Create a record A
Arrange yourself to have two new records B popping right away (through an onchange)
in the o2m. Their C field have to be empty
Resequence those two B lines with the handle
Before this commit, there was a traceback when trying to do an name_get on the C fields
Since both of them are empty, there is no record in the localData
Hence, no model. And also no records anyway, so no need to do a name_get
After this commit, there is no traceback, the name_get is avoided when no data is to be fetched
OPW 1853088
closes #24988
|
|
|
|
There was no consideration of the fact that the widget
rendering process could be asynchronous. This commit
fixes that situation so that render a node of type
<widget name="..."> is now possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before this rev. the `column_invisible` and `default_order` attribute, set in a
x2m list view were only taken into account for inline views.
The technical reason behind is because non inline views are fetched after the
main view processing.
Non inline x2m list views now correctly handle these two attributes.
|
|
Model A has a o2m to model B
Model B has a m2o parent_id on B
In A's form, add a B item,
then in the m2o, create record
Save and New
Click on the m2o
Before this commit, the python crashed on name_search.
This was because we sent the virtual ids to it
After this commit, there is no crash
OPW 1850212
closes #24948
|
|
Have a decorated (conditional on field) editable list, with a default_order.
Have more records than the pager allows.
Add an item, and hit escape to cancel addition.
Before this commit, the cancellation crashed because the first record on the other page
was trying to evaluate the decoration for its row, which is wrong in the first place.
This was because creating a record increases the limit of the list, to be able to see the record
being created.
At cancellation though, that limit was never decreased.
After this commit, the whole flow happens without problem.
OPW 1844495
closes #24682
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revision on 8ac98fc78a3794e06481b02a431bcdc386a5a6ee
The commit above does not check whether the list contains data or not.
As a result, if there are no data in the list, there is no reason to
fetch `name_gets`.
In fact, there could be a traceback because some parameters of this rpc
are computed from data in the list. So if there are no data in the list,
the parameters of the rpc are undefined. This was the case for a test
in enterprise.
|
|
Revision on https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/9a9da5763b38a3bce54e9c4870af0032e38cacc3
The intent of the commit above was to no abandon records in a list on
discard when these records have been created from a `default_get`.
Also, the `default_get` may also perform an `onchange` that could create
more records. The records from this `onchange` must also be included in
the "do not abandon" rule.
However, the rule was too relax, so that any following `onchanges` from
a user interaction was also considered into this rule. As a result, it was
not possible to abandon such records.
With this fix, we restrict the rule to `default_get` (already the case) and
only the `onchange` right after a `default_get`. Any record created on an
`onchange` from a user interaction after a `default_get` should be abandoned
on discard.
Representation of creating the list:
savepoint
|----------|-----------|-------||--------|------->
create default_get onchange1 onchange2
record in the list is created by default_get or onchange1
=> do not abandon on discard
record in the list is created by onchange2
=> abandon on discard
|
|
Before this commit, some records in a list did not show the name of their
many2one fields.
This case occurs when the records in the list are created from a default_get,
and the records do not fit in a single page. In that case, the records in the
first page correctly display the names of their many2one fields, but not the
records in the other pages.
Fixes #24547
|
|
Before this commit, when a list contains records with many2one fields that
contain the same values, duplicate ids were passed to the server on rpc
`name_get`.
For instance, if 40 records in a list refer to a Unit of Measure with id "1"
whose displayed_name is "unit(s)", the server receives a long list of ids with
simply the value "1". Also, the server responds with a list of displayed_name,
in this case a list of 40 strings "unit(s)".
With this commit, we always pass unique ids to the server on rpc `name_get`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When sorting records according to a many2one field in a list view
embedded in a form view, the js would sort according to their ids,
in a seemingly arbitrary order.
Thus sorting records according to a field with values in ("a", "b", "c")
could be sorted as "a", "a", "c", "b" instead of "a", "a", "b", "c".
We make the comparison on the name of the field instead.
opw 1838860
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently, rev. c0809dd41 removed a protection in the reload of
Kanban views with progressbars. This protection ensured that the
manual reload of the progressbars was only done when one of the
records of the Kanban view was updated (and not when a column, or
the whole view was).
However, removing it highlighted a bug linked to the manual reload
of progressbars, which messed up the list of ids in the
environment. As a consequence, for instance, if the user archived
the records of a column, and then opendc a record in form view,
it couldn't use the pager anymore.
Besides fixing this bug, this rev. re-introduces the protection,
and refines it to prevent 2 useless RPCs when the whole Kanban
view was reloaded.
opw~1841276
opw~1841342
|
|
|
|
Assume a one2many field inside a form, displaying field A in its
list view, and a field B in its (dialog) form view. Moreover, there
is an action button in the dialog, which updates the value of B.
Before this rev., B wasn't correctly reloaded when the button was
clicked, because the BasicModel reloaded the fields on the list
view (i.e. field A), whereas it should reload the fields in both
views.
This fix is twofold. First, we force the viewType to 'form' when
the record is reloaded, instead of the default ('list'), so that
fields in the form view are correctly reloaded. Second, when we
open the form view in the dialog, we add the fields of the list
view to the dict of fields of the form view, so that the form
is aware of those fields and can ask the model to reload them
(still without displaying them).
Fixes #24189
|
|
|
|
This causes issues (already 3, and counting...)
This reverts commit 27c9f838d35f36f6fe8d68068ed96c5c58d9d186.
opw-1840984
opw-1841041
opw-1841000
|
|
|
|
Have a One2Many
The views of that o2m define two inline views: the list and the form
in the list view, put a field that isn't in the form and used in a domain
Try to add an item to the list
The form pops up
Fill in the data and save & close
Before this commit:
It crashed when evaluating the domain on a field using the field that is not in the form
After this commit:
Subviews share their fields in a special object on the parent record
In our case, the form view checks in that shared resource if the fields it is supposed to initialize
are there.
Hence, this flow doesn't crash anymore
OPW 1837511
closes #24350
|
|
Before this, the progressbar values were not updated (both count and progress)
after archiving all the records of a column.
Multiple things have been done here to update it.
Firstly, a optimization had been done to avoid reloading the progressbar when
updating a column ; this optimization was not correct due to this precise use
case. This will update the progressbar.
Secondly, the `aggregateValues` are reset when putting empty groups back in the
datapoint. This attribute is used to compute the counter if a `sum_field` is set
on the progressbar widget. It needs to be reset because the loop that computes
it won't iterate on empty groups.
Eventually, the mockRPC of the progressbar route was not taking the `group_by`
argument into account (probably a typo).
|
|
Rev. 374af56 changed the way 'button' nodes are rendered in basic
views (form, list, kanban). As a consequence, their 'name'
attribute wasn't transmitted to the produced html elements anymore.
However, this attribute is very convenient to debug views, and to
write selectors in tests. For instance, it broke the test added by
rev. 8d17a2a once forwardported in master.
This commit reverts 1ce5bea.
|
|
Before this fix, when going on the graph view from the dashboard view (
using the fullscreen button on dashboard), the focus is on the search
input, hitting the tab key creates a crash.
This fix gives a default implementation of giveFocus to the
abstractrenderer so there is no crash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The initial rev. odoo/odoo@2d3ecf2 that was supposed to handle this use case
was in fact only dealing with one command as default value for nested x2m, not
more.
The basic model can now handle multiple commands.
Closes #24241
|
|
Also, fix a few errors in the js docstring
|
|
Here is a scenario that could happen before this commit:
1. go to a list view with more than one record, say 3
2. click on the 3rd record to open the form view
3. the pager says 3/3
4. click on edit button
5. click on discard button
6. the pager says 1/3 (but the record displayed is still the same)
It is often necessary to restore the offset for the sub records, because
the number of pages in a one2many could have changed. However, it is
not a good idea to do that for the main record, since it interferes with
the usual flow of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Button rendering was most of the time wrong, incomplete or performed
with duplicated code. This led to:
- Both primary and default classes were put on some statusbar buttons
- Icons were not able to be put for statusbar buttons
- Stat buttons and list buttons code were duplicated
- Classes and style were added twice
- ...
|
|
Before this rev. it was not possible to define a value for a reference field
in x2m commands as default value.
Courtesy of @kaerdsar.
Closes #24070
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before this rev., a crash occured when a default_get returned a
command 0 (CREATE) for a one2many, with a value for a date(time)
field (e.g. [0, false, {some_date_field: '2018-12-08'}]). This
was because the related values (inside the commands) weren't
parsed. This only impacted date and datetime fields, for which the
parsing converts the string into a moment instance.
Fixes #23672
|
|
Have the create_date field displays on a one2many list
Try to add a record onto the list
Before this commit, when the virtual record is added onto the list
it crashes because the datetime field is undefined and cannot be parsed
After this commit, It doesn't crash though the value would have to wait the save on the main record
to be updated (because it is the create_date)
OPW 1834250
closes #24097
|
|
In a kanban grouped by many2one with a progressbar, after emptying a column
by moving all records, the column wasn't correctly updated. This was causing,
in the best case, a record duplication or, in the worst case, a traceback.
This issue comes from the fact that, with a progressbar, a read_group is
performed each time a record is moved. When the group (column) becomes empty,
the read_group won't return this group even though the group still appears in
the kankan. When moving back the record in this empty column, there is a
desynchronization between the kanban controller data and the model.
To fix this issue, an option `keepEmptyGroups` is passed when performing the
mentioned read_group ; this mimics the kanban display that keeps empty groups
displayed and there is no desync anymore.
Fixes #23982
|
