| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It is now possible to put buttons in the list view group headers.
When the view is grouped by a many2one field, those buttons
appear next to the header title when the group is opened.
The buttons are specified in the views in a <groupby> tag in the
list arch, with the following structure:
<groupby name="groupedField"> <!-- must be a many2one -->
<button type="object" name="my_method" string="Button1"/>
</groupby>
It is also possible to add `field`, inside the `groupby` which can
be used for modifiers. These fields thus belong on the many2one
comodel, like:
<groupby name="partner_id">
<field name="name"/> <!-- name of partner_id -->
<button type="object" name="my_method" string="Button1"
attrs="{'invisible': [('name', '=', 'Georges')]}"/>
</groupby>
These extra fields are fetched in batch when grouping on the field.
Part of task 1915702
|
|
This commit extends the support of comparison mode for the graph view
and refine the tooltips and rendering in line mode.
The graph view code has also been slightly refactored.
Task ID: 1946138
|
|
Part of task 1896658
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Christophe Matthieu <chm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: David Monjoie <dmo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: svs-odoo <svs@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt <vsc@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
Let's assume a many2one field with a lot of possible values. The
user clicks on 'Search More...'. In the opened dialog, only 160
records are available (their ids have been obtained with a
name_search, with the optional text the user could have typed in
the many2one input).
Before 4cd379cf, that extra domain on ids was removed automatically
as soon as the user interacted with the search view in the dialog.
This was especially useful when there were more than 160 records.
However, this was rather an happy coincidence than a designed
feature.
From 4cd379cf, the ids selection was added to the initial domain
of the list, so they couldn't be removed from the domain
afterwards. The user was thus stucked with its preselected 160
records.
This rev. doesn't restore the former behavior, but rather improves
the current one, as follows:
- when there is no text in the many2one input (i.e. no value to
filter on), we bypass the name_search, s.t. all records are
available in the dialog
- when there is some text in the input, we perform a name_search (as
before) to get a list of record ids, and we add a special filter
to the search view in the dialog (the filter on those ids), s.t.
the user can remove it if he wants to access the remaining records.
- finally, the limit is now set to 320, to mitigate the problem
Issue reported on the saas-12.1 migration pad.
closes odoo/odoo#31232
|
|
This rev. defines a searchPanel widget used in Kanban views to
refine search according to specific dimensions. This wigdet is
displayed as a sidebar to the left of the kanban view.
Part of task 1892462
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
|
|
The docstring says they are boolean, but they actually aren't
(e.g. edit="0" in the arch would lead to activeActions.edit=0).
This could cause issue if that value is used to toggle a class
with jQuery, as in this case the flag argument *must* be a boolean.
|
|
The recent refactoring of the control panel moved the sidebar management
from the action manager to the view itself. However, the sidebar
parameter was forgotten, which resulted in the fact that it was no
longer created.
This fix was a little tricky, because the sidebar needs to be
instantiated in some tests, but not in most of them (in particular, the
document application changes its behaviour, which is annoying).
closes odoo/odoo#29389
|
|
This branch introduces a large-scale reorganization of the
component tree generated by the web client. The short version is
that now, the control panel is a child of the view controller and
no longer a sibling. Graphically (and simplified), we go from
this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
/ \
controlPanel viewController
/ \
to this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
|
viewController
/ | \
ControlPanelController
/ \
CPRenderer CPModel
The motivation is that this work moves the code where it should be.
Before this commit, it was kind of weird to have code in the
controllers to render buttons outside of their root node (in
renderButtons). Also, the action manager had to take care of
coordinating search view states between view transitions.
So, this work simplifies the code. It also makes it easier to
extend. We see day after day that Odoo needs to take care of more
complex UI needs, and in many cases, these needs were quite
difficult to implement (we prefer spaghettis in our plates, not in
our code). The changes in this branch should open the way to
implement these features.
For example,
- it will now be easy to add the possibility of views (for example,
the search view or a new ControlPanel view) to add custom buttons
(of type action or object) in the control panel.
- Another need will be to serialize/ restore the state of the
search view across action boundaries (needed by the dashboard).
- Another example is the possibility for views to customize easily
the presence/absence of sub menus (filters/groupbys/favorites/
time range/...)
- Another need is an easier way for views/client action to customize
their control panel.
This commit also contains a large rewrite of the search view (so it
is more inline with our architecture and easier to maintain).
Part of task 1893568
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have:
- Model A with a x2m to model B
- Object A with multiple objects B in x2m (that will be sorted)
- On the list view of model A, click on a column to sort by a field
- this field shall not exist in B
- open a record A (towards form view)
Before this commit, the sorting of the x2m crashed, because the key orderedBy was propagated
Due to commit e713ed2a69af9fe97fbe2d54843adc8f1ce689aa
After this commit, it doesn't crash
OPW 1913133
closes odoo/odoo#29094
|
|
|
|
In some cases, and for historical reasons, the groupby property can be
expressed as a string (for example, 'stage_id') instead of a list of
strings (for example, ['stage_id']).
However, the support was not complete. A crash could happen in some
cases. For example, if there is a group_by: 'stage_id' property in the
context of an action, it works in list view, but adding that view to the
dashboard would result in a crash, without this commit.
|
|
Rev. 42e1efded5 aimed to disable the quick create feature when
grouped by date(time) fields, by only enabling it for char, boolean
and many2one fields. However, the selection case is quite important
and must be handled as well. This is what this rev. does.
Task 1878254
|
|
|
|
when grouped on field types for which it isn't supported.
Rev. 42e1efd disabled the quick create feature when the view is
grouped by date(time) fields. However, it hasn't been correctly
forwardported to 11.0 (with the new views). Indeed, the check was
done only once, at the initilization of the view. So if the user
selected another field to group by afterwards, the quick create
feature wasn't enabled/disabled accordingly.
Moreover, we didn't check if it was available when the user clicked
on CREATE in the control panel. So even if it wasn't (and thus if
there were no '+' icon in the columns), when the user clicked on
CREATE, the quick create widget was inserted in the first column.
This rev. fixes both issues.
Task 1878254
closes odoo/odoo#27867
|
|
|
|
|
|
(mainly views and ActionManager)
- add missing docstrings
- fix typos
- correctly order functions and imports
- put functions in correct sections
- stop using 'event' as argument of handlers
- don't call handlers directly
- remove trailing spaces/tabs
- move module created in stable version to its own file
- follow js guidelines in general
closes odoo/odoo#28024
|
|
Before this commit, every pie chart without any data displayed
the non content helper in the middle of the screen.
This behavior is intended most of the time except for embedded
pie chart (such as in the dashboard views).
Now, an embedded pie chart without any data is rendered and displays
the error message in the middle of it.
We had to render it with nv.d3 to match the size of the other
graph in comparison mode.
Another commit in enterprise will add a test for this fix.
For the moment, embedded empty pie charts are only used on
dasboard views.
|
|
Revision on https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/017e71322b6b7f0c232f0d66ba659a5972fc3534
Commit above correctly fixes an issue with 'Edit View: X' menu item
in the debug manager, in which the name of the view was missing.
To do so, it lets the controller be aware of the name of the view,
so that it can be used in the template of the debug menu.
However, we think there is a much better solution to fixing this
issue: since the debug manager has knowledge of the view action,
we can extend this object with the name of the view.
This is exactly what this commit does: extend the action view object
so that it knows the name of the view. That way, the template is much
more readable, as `view.displayName` is more meaningful than
`controller.viewName`.
Task-ID 1878254
|
|
Revision on https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f7fbe8adffb1ee585c8171f6c86d38145c11848d
The commit above wrongly assumes that the object 'view' is an instance
of the view class. As a result, the property `display_name` was undefined.
This commit fixes the issue by letting the controller remember the name
of the view in a similar was as the type of the view. That way, the name
of the view can simply be retrieved from the instance of the controller
class.
Task-ID 1878254
|
|
This commit introduces a new widget 'TimeRangeMenu' used in
the search view. It allows a user to easily:
- search data with a given date or datetime field value
in a specified period of time
- compare the data of interest with data of the previous
period or the previous year.
The time range menu is available in the search view when one
of the four following view types is instantiated:
graph, pivot, cohort, or dashboard.
Task Id: 1835644
|
|
Add a banner_route attribute to AbstractView to allow fetching html from a
controller route and displaying it above the view.
The initial use case was the onboarding panels.
Supported views are the ones inheriting both AbstractView and AbstractController.
|
|
In this commit, we extend the search view to allow the selection
of some intervals for date or datetime fields in groupby menu.
The valid intervals are day, week, month, quarter, and year.
It is also possible to add a button 'Group By' in the control panel
owned by a graph view in case it is declared 'embedded' (e.g. in a
dashboard view).
Note that have three new generic reusable widgets have been introduced
in this commit: DropdownMenu, GroupByMenu, and FiltersMenu.
|
|
Assume a one2many field inside a form, displaying field A in its
list view, and a field B in its (dialog) form view. Moreover, there
is an action button in the dialog, which updates the value of B.
Before this rev., B wasn't correctly reloaded when the button was
clicked, because the BasicModel reloaded the fields on the list
view (i.e. field A), whereas it should reload the fields in both
views.
This fix is twofold. First, we force the viewType to 'form' when
the record is reloaded, instead of the default ('list'), so that
fields in the form view are correctly reloaded. Second, when we
open the form view in the dialog, we add the fields of the list
view to the dict of fields of the form view, so that the form
is aware of those fields and can ask the model to reload them
(still without displaying them).
Fixes #24189
|
|
|
|
Before this rev., it might happen that the parent of BasicModel instances
wasn't correctly set to the Controller instance. It was actually set to the
ActionManager instance, which is never destroyed. So when this happened,
the BasicModel instance wasn't destroyed when it's controller was.
|
|
Before this rev., it might happen that the parent of BasicModel instances
wasn't correctly set to the Controller instance. It was actually set to the
ActionManager instance, which is never destroyed. So when this happened,
the BasicModel instance wasn't destroyed when it's controller was.
|
|
*: mail, web_diagram
|
|
... as this function is only used by the FormView.
|
|
|
|
This rev. is the first part (out of 3) of the refactoring of the
ActionManager and ViewManager layer of the webclient.
The main changes are:
- there is no ViewManager anymore, its work is now handled by the
ActionManager itself, but isolated in a specific file ; this
eases a lot of things, as the breadcrumbs handling for example.
- the ActionManager code is converted to the new coding principles
and guidelines ; mainly, children widgets communicate with it by
triggering events up, and not by function calls anymore.
- the ActionManager layer is now testable, and a lot of tests have
already been written.
- the code in other addons has been adapted consequently.
What's coming next:
- introduce the 'AbstractAction' Widget, and make client actions
and view controllers inherit from it ; this widget will
implement a common API that could be used uniformly by the
ActionManager (e.g. restore(), canBeLeft(), renderButtons(),
getTitle()...).
- move the ControlPanel handling from the ActionManager to the
AbstractAction.
|
|
The attibute was correctly set on form, list and kanban views, but
not on the other ones. It wasn't really used until now, so it
wasn't a big deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
*board,sale_timesheet
This rev. changes the API of load_views, as it now assumes that
the given context has no longer to be evaluated. This is more
convenient that way, as we can now call load_views with contexts
that are dict, and not instances of the Context class.
|
|
Before this commit, the 'limit' attribtue worked properly for list views
(but was not documented), and was ignored for inline tree views. There
was no good reason for that limitation, so we fix this issue.
|
|
|
|
Before this commit, the widget many2many_tags only loaded the first 40
records. This was difficult to see, because there were not so many views
with a lot of tags.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before this rev., it crashed if an x2many field had the
attr invisible set to 'True' in a form view.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before this commit, the xml attributes defined with 'context.get(key)' in the
subviews not inline were not evaluated correctly. This was caused
by the loss of the one context in the '_loadSubviews' method.
This commit fixes this issue and modifies the mockserver in order to be able
to use the parameter 'viewOptions.context'.
|
|
|
|
|
