| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
from mail to web
with this commit, we have updated the attachment widget view same as like chatter attachment view
moved the common scss code from mail to web for many2many_binary widget, which is used for attachment
and update test case according to the widget
Task ID: 1930087
|
|
Before this rev., widgets were absolutely positioned in table
cells. This cause an undesired effect with text fields, as their
textarea overflowed and overlapped the next lines.
With this rev., wigdets are now statically positioned, and the cells
height and width don't change when switching a row to edit mode.
Part of task 1915702
|
|
This rev. changes the layout of *editable* list views to a fixed
layout. This means that we are now responsible of the width of
each column. To do that, we associate with each field type a
factor, and the higher the factor is, the larger the column will
be (w.r.t. the others). This default value can be overriden in the
arch.
The fixed layout allows to remove the absolute positionning of
widgets inside editable lists (done in the next commit).
Part of task 1915702
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
|
|
This rev. enables the editable feature in grouped list views.
Part of task 1915702
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
|
|
This commit is one part of the task 'removing nvd3'.
We use now Chart.js to draw charts.
Task ID: 1946138
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#32088
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
|
|
Before this commit, there were a crash if you tried to add an optionnal
product in a new sale order without saving it.
Apply same logic as in the ListRenderer: buttons with type="object" are
disabled for no saved yet records, as calling the python method with no
id would make no sense.
To avoid to expose this logic inside all Kanban views, we define a
specific KanbanRecord Class for the One2many case.
This could be refactored to prevent from duplicating this logic in list
and kanban views.
Original Task ID: 1945006
closes odoo/odoo#31695
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before 11.0 the kanban view used to have its own widget registry. It is not the
case anymore, but there are still leftovers from the past. For example, the
widget `kanban_label_selection` is still used in many views, even though it is
now called `label_selection`.
As we are in a stable version, a fallback has been added for it in the field
registry.
Similar to odoo/odoo@5401c15
Closes odoo/odoo#30904
Closes odoo/odoo#25928
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#31790
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
|
|
Part of task 1896658
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Christophe Matthieu <chm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: David Monjoie <dmo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: svs-odoo <svs@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt <vsc@odoo.com>
|
|
Commit 4960453d added the field signature in field_registry.js and
in signature.js.
closes odoo/odoo#31434
Signed-off-by: =?utf-8?b?R8OpcnkgRGVib25nbmllIChnZWQp?= <ged@openerp.com>
closes odoo/odoo#31616
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commit 4960453d added the field signature in field_registry.js and
in signature.js.
closes odoo/odoo#31434
Signed-off-by: =?utf-8?b?R8OpcnkgRGVib25nbmllIChnZWQp?= <ged@openerp.com>
|
|
Let's assume a many2one field with a lot of possible values. The
user clicks on 'Search More...'. In the opened dialog, only 160
records are available (their ids have been obtained with a
name_search, with the optional text the user could have typed in
the many2one input).
Before 4cd379cf, that extra domain on ids was removed automatically
as soon as the user interacted with the search view in the dialog.
This was especially useful when there were more than 160 records.
However, this was rather an happy coincidence than a designed
feature.
From 4cd379cf, the ids selection was added to the initial domain
of the list, so they couldn't be removed from the domain
afterwards. The user was thus stucked with its preselected 160
records.
This rev. doesn't restore the former behavior, but rather improves
the current one, as follows:
- when there is no text in the many2one input (i.e. no value to
filter on), we bypass the name_search, s.t. all records are
available in the dialog
- when there is some text in the input, we perform a name_search (as
before) to get a list of record ids, and we add a special filter
to the search view in the dialog (the filter on those ids), s.t.
the user can remove it if he wants to access the remaining records.
- finally, the limit is now set to 320, to mitigate the problem
Issue reported on the saas-12.1 migration pad.
closes odoo/odoo#31232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The widget has been moved in rev. odoo/odoo@15f3bbe but was not very generic.
In particular, there was a traceback when clicking on the button if the field
had no value (the button was displayed for readonly fields in create mode).
The button is now only appended in readonly mode (a `button` inside an `input`
or a `textarea` is not very DOM friendly) if the field has a value.
Task 1941996
closes odoo/odoo#31635
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Issue: wysiwyg asset slow down the loading of the website, error
inadvertently introduced: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29775
The assets are now loaded assynchroneously, when the editor is needed,
its assets will be loaded.
closes odoo/odoo#30700
|
|
Add a new widget for binary fields. It open a dialog box and the user can sign manually,
or an signature can be draw automatically or he can upload a picture of his signature.
Move fonts, controller, scss,templates about signature from portal to web to avoid redundance
closes odoo/odoo#30222
|
|
This commit change widget to many2one_barcode in these views:
- sale_order
- purchase
- invoice
- expense
In the fields register 'many2one_barcode' is mapped to many2one as fallback.
many2one_barcode is implemented in odoo enterprise
Task ID: 1924766
closes odoo/odoo#31018
|
|
The docstring says they are boolean, but they actually aren't
(e.g. edit="0" in the arch would lead to activeActions.edit=0).
This could cause issue if that value is used to toggle a class
with jQuery, as in this case the flag argument *must* be a boolean.
|
|
Since rev. odoo/odoo@f4d541e the `session_id` cookie uses the `httponly` flag so
it cannot be accessed through client side script. But before this rev. the
`session_id` was still provided by the server to the webclient (in session_info,
mostly) and was stored and accessible. This made XSS injection more
dangerous than they should be as it was very easy to steal the `session_id`.
As the browser automatically set the `session_id` on every request to the server,
the webclient shouldn't need any explicit reference.
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#30792
|
|
|
|
Expose to public the variable FieldX2Many.
Task ID: 1910385
closes odoo/odoo#30512
|
|
|
|
During the unit tests, I have noticed that the test window was doing a
lot of work after the test were completed, it was using CPU and using RAM
in jigsaw pattern. Eventually after being left alone for a few hours,
the window would just crash.
This was due to an unlimitted chain of deferred running when an image
field had a load error.
The situation is as such:
1. The image is put in the DOM with an onError handler
2. There is an error, as the image is a dummy text for the tests
3. The onError is called, it clears the image field, then calls _render
4. _render re-adds an image with the same onError handler <----------
5. The onError is called - again - it clears the image field - again |
(wich does nothing this time because the value is the same) - |
then calls _render - again |
6. The second time _render is called, go to step 4 --------------------
... In the meantime, the widget has been destroyed by the test,
so it should not do anything anymore.
This fix breaks the loop, as well as bind the onError handled with 'one'
instead of 'on'.
closes odoo/odoo#30716
|
|
|
|
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#30566
|
|
Open studio to modify the widget displaying a relational field.
The report_layout widget can be selected, say, to display payment terms.
Obviously it doesn't make sense.
We remove its supported field, as the field is not generic
(indeed there is only one use for it in the codebase).
opw 1919369
closes odoo/odoo#30303
|
|
When a percentage if formatted, the decimal separator used is always
`.`, while it should be the decimal separator of the language.
opw-1908220
closes odoo/odoo#30030
|
|
|
|
|
|
This branch introduces a large-scale reorganization of the
component tree generated by the web client. The short version is
that now, the control panel is a child of the view controller and
no longer a sibling. Graphically (and simplified), we go from
this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
/ \
controlPanel viewController
/ \
to this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
|
viewController
/ | \
ControlPanelController
/ \
CPRenderer CPModel
The motivation is that this work moves the code where it should be.
Before this commit, it was kind of weird to have code in the
controllers to render buttons outside of their root node (in
renderButtons). Also, the action manager had to take care of
coordinating search view states between view transitions.
So, this work simplifies the code. It also makes it easier to
extend. We see day after day that Odoo needs to take care of more
complex UI needs, and in many cases, these needs were quite
difficult to implement (we prefer spaghettis in our plates, not in
our code). The changes in this branch should open the way to
implement these features.
For example,
- it will now be easy to add the possibility of views (for example,
the search view or a new ControlPanel view) to add custom buttons
(of type action or object) in the control panel.
- Another need will be to serialize/ restore the state of the
search view across action boundaries (needed by the dashboard).
- Another example is the possibility for views to customize easily
the presence/absence of sub menus (filters/groupbys/favorites/
time range/...)
- Another need is an easier way for views/client action to customize
their control panel.
This commit also contains a large rewrite of the search view (so it
is more inline with our architecture and easier to maintain).
Part of task 1893568
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current implementation of the state_selection widget always makes it
editable even if the field is readonly.
We improved this behavior by removing the handle of click on the widget
when the field is readonly, but keeping it even if the view is not in
edit mode, because it used for example in project to change state even
when view is not editable.
closes odoo/odoo#29218
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a form view (account.invoice), have a date field as:
<field name="date" options="{\'datepicker\': {\'warn_future\': true}}"/>
Open a record with the field set to a value
Click Edit, click save
Click create
Before this commit, the value of the field of the new record
took the one of the previous record
On account invoices, it resulted on having the popup "The record has been modified etc...."
And it was not possible to create an invoice from another one
this was because we passed the same reference object for the datepicker
After this commit, there is no popup as the field do not take a value from the framework
OPW 1906085
closes odoo/odoo#28759
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#28798
|
|
Improve various design elements in sales onboarding and config bar :
Onboarding :
- tooltip and done button
Company info:
- Move the incoterm field from company view to account settings.
Document layout:
- layout widget relabelling and reorganizing
- paper format as required
- added a Preview button
Payment methods and sample quotation :
- Style and relabelling
|
|
Have a form record with a progress bar
Modify the max_value of the progress, as well as the current_value bar through an onchange
Before this commit, the new max_value was not taken into account
After this commit, it is.
closes odoo/odoo#29056
|
