| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Go to CRM/Sales/Team Pileline. Place your cursor on the chart, a tooltip
appears, move your cusror away, the tooltip disappear. Now clic anywhere
on the interface so the page change (i.e. on "x Open Opportunities") and
quickly while the page loads place your cursor on the tooltip, it
appears but when the page change it doesn't disappear.
The problem here is that the graph element is removed from the DOM which
prevent the correct handling of the `mousehover` event used internally
by nv.d3 to show/hide the related tooltip.
The solution is to manually hide the tooltip when the graph element is
removed from the DOM.
opw-2042286
closes odoo/odoo#35172
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When uploading a file to a binary file, then clicking on the
"clear" button, then reuploading the same file...
Before this commit:
The actual input of the field was only changed on user input.
This means that the "clear" action didn't reset the actual value
of the input, and the browser's default behaviour when getting
the same path twice is not to change anything. In the use case,
you couldn't upload the same file until you uploaded another one.
After this commit:
The "clear" action now also clears the value, allowing reuploading
the same file over again.
closes odoo/odoo#33843
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before 11.0 the kanban view used to have its own widget registry. It is not the
case anymore, but there are still leftovers from the past. For example, the
widget `kanban_label_selection` is still used in many views, even though it is
now called `label_selection`.
As we are in a stable version, a fallback has been added for it in the field
registry.
Similar to odoo/odoo@5401c15
Closes odoo/odoo#30904
Closes odoo/odoo#25928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since f4fbaf1efa the structure of checkboxes has been improved, now we
have something like:
```
<input type="checkbox" id="checkbox-18" class="custom-control-input">
<label for="checkbox-18" class="custom-control-label">​</label>
```
With the first input invisible (whilst before it was visible and the
clickable element).
This cause an issue in an editable list view:
- we have a boolean readonly field in a cell
- we are on focused on a line (not in the boolean field cell)
- we click on the boolean field
=> the check mark is toggled
This is because when we switch cell, we try to activate the widget of
the other cell. Before f4fbaf1efa this issue did not happen since the
browser do not generate a click event when clicking a disabled checkbox.
With this changeset, a disabled FieldBoolean is not focusable as is the
case for other fields, so we can't "activate" it.
Without the fix, the added test fails with:
[clicking disabled checkbox did not work]
opw-1958433
closes #32652
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Have a timesheet uom per Day
Have a language with a different number format than English
Click on grid cell to change its value
Before this commit, the value was stuck on the highest value in range
This was because the parsing of the value into float was not taking into account
the real format of the float
After this commit, it works in all languages
OPW 1964657
closes odoo/odoo#32581
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
The widget has been moved in rev. odoo/odoo@15f3bbe but was not very generic.
In particular, there was a traceback when clicking on the button if the field
had no value (the button was displayed for readonly fields in create mode).
The button is now only appended in readonly mode (a `button` inside an `input`
or a `textarea` is not very DOM friendly) if the field has a value.
Task 1941996
closes odoo/odoo#31635
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
|
|
Have a form record with a progress bar
Modify the max_value of the progress, as well as the current_value bar through an onchange
Before this commit, the new max_value was not taken into account
After this commit, it is.
closes odoo/odoo#29056
|
|
When creating a SO line and clicking on search more for product_id
Before this commit, every user had the button "Create" to create a product.product
After this commit, only user in groups that actually can create a product have the button
OPW 1910371
closes odoo/odoo#28924
|
|
|
|
With the BS4 update, a traceback occured when clicking on a m2m tag using colors
in a list view.
When using colors on m2m tags, the badge was wrapped inside a `dropdown-toggle`.
However, there is no `dropdown-menu` by default (it is only rendered in FormFieldMany2ManyTags
when clicking on the `.dropdown-toggle`, hence the traceback.
The `dropdown-toggle` class is now only set if necessary.
Task 1925313
closes odoo/odoo#31445
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#30792
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#30566
|
|
Open studio to modify the widget displaying a relational field.
The report_layout widget can be selected, say, to display payment terms.
Obviously it doesn't make sense.
We remove its supported field, as the field is not generic
(indeed there is only one use for it in the codebase).
opw 1919369
closes odoo/odoo#30303
|
|
When a percentage if formatted, the decimal separator used is always
`.`, while it should be the decimal separator of the language.
opw-1908220
closes odoo/odoo#30030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we click on a link, we only want to open the URL,
and not the record when the button is on a list.
PR: #27230
|
|
The reference widget is expecting a models list as selection attribute
in the field declaration.
It does not exist in the case of the char field.
Support for char fields was added to allow for external identifiers,
but it only works in readonly.
As a consequence, it tracebacks in Edit mode when used in studio.
We thusly remove char field from the list of supported fields.
opw 1892602
closes odoo/odoo#27708
|
|
In a form view (account.invoice), have a date field as:
<field name="date" options="{\'datepicker\': {\'warn_future\': true}}"/>
Open a record with the field set to a value
Click Edit, click save
Click create
Before this commit, the value of the field of the new record
took the one of the previous record
On account invoices, it resulted on having the popup "The record has been modified etc...."
And it was not possible to create an invoice from another one
this was because we passed the same reference object for the datepicker
After this commit, there is no popup as the field do not take a value from the framework
OPW 1906085
closes odoo/odoo#28759
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#28798
|
|
The format function was missing for the percentage widget type, so
`field_utils.parse[this.formatType]` (see [1]) resolved as
`undefined` which is not a function and so raised an error when
the user was trying to update the field.
This PR add that parsing function. Both `xx%` and `0.xx` are
understood by the parser and resolve to the correct float value.
opw-1895979
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/e220721a8ee80c02fe5aba5ed8c9f3f4ae54ea97/addons/web/static/src/js/fields/abstract_field.js#L399
closes odoo/odoo#28431
|
|
|
|
Let's assume a form view with field A and B (a one2many list), with
a column with attrs column_invisible depending on A.
If the user sets A manually, everything works fine (the column is
hidden/shown directly). However, if A is updated by an onchange
(e.g. depending on the number of rows in B), it doesn't. This
rev. fixes that issue.
Related to Issue: 1851451
Co-authored-by: Priyanka Kaakdiya <pka@odoo.com>
|
|
On the user's preference, change the timezone to one that is different
from the browser.
Save the form.
Go back to the user's preferences.
Before this commit, every timezone was displayed inside the span that contain
the warning icon, and leaked everywhere on the form view.
This was because of the joint action effects of commits:
86897ca167338ca434e62827fa09f44ddbce324c
4dfabb8f7adde06a7936502af61534c9958ed4f7
Which provoked the field to be re-rendered in edit mode,
but with an $el on which a span was added. `<option/>` elements
were then added to both `<select>` and `<span>`
This did not happen before v12.0
After this commit, there is no display glitch
OPW 1895088
closes odoo/odoo#28108
|
|
|
|
The handler function was used directly in the code. The MouseEvent wasn't provided in that case.
This FIX split the handler function and the processing function so that it doesn't interfere.
closes odoo/odoo#27929
|
|
|
|
The datetimepicker option was introduced to be able to customize the
datetime picker widget in date/datetime fields. However, due to the way
the _makeDatePicker function was coded, it did not work in datetime
fields.
Thank to Yajo for the initial fix
closes odoo/odoo#27541
|
|
Introduce official support for SVG files in the framework, including the
following parts:
1. When client-side SVG images are uploaded, the content is displayed until
you save using data URI scheme according RFC 2397 [1]. This scheme requires
to specify content format. Using hardcoded "image/png" works for all images
types except SVG.
Type-sniffing is done using "magic byte" detection via the first base64
encode byte, so that the proper data URI scheme can be used.
This should not cause SVG-related security problems as the file is
displayed through `<img>` tag, which does not allow SVG scripting [2].
2. Make /web/image controller compatible with SVG
3. Add support for SVG files for company logo, which uses a dedicated
controller.
4. Resizing of SVG files is a no-op, as it makes little sense for a
vector-based format. We also want to avoid micro-alterations to the SVG
document (in "natural" viewport parameters) as we would store multiple
copies of the files in the filestore.
5. Because SVG files are inherently dangerous, upload of SVG files is
restricted to administrators, either by blocking it directly before
saving it in the database (binary fields with attachment=False), or by
neutering them to text/plain mimetype (for binary fields with
attachment=True)
6. Add tests for the SVG upload cases and for the non-admin uploads.
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2397
[2] https://www.w3.org/wiki/SVG_Security
Closes #26635
|
|
Targets commit d3530eb07e24278117ab396ecb86a59deecc312d
Purpose
=======
[Follow up AL review]
Removed the default_get override in the sale_order_line model.
- The default values to create records are now specified by pefixing them with "default_" in the JS.
That will use the built-in framework method, which is more simple/clean.
- The "list_editable_renderer.js" file for the product configurator was removed and its content is now merged within
the SectionAndNoteListRenderer.
Updated fields:
- [sale_order_line in sale/sale.py] "product_no_variant_attribute_values" to "product_no_variant_attribute_value_ids"
|
|
A recent modification of the float and integer
formatters allowing the rendering to be human readable
causes a bug in the percentage formatter for large values.
The reason is that the latter formatter uses formatFloat (wich can
now produce 'numbers' like 3k) and then parse the result. In the case
of 3k an error is raised since 3k is not recognized as a true number.
This fixes avoid to parse the number in case it has been formatted
to be 'readable'. Note that the parsing was essentially used
to produces better percentages like 10% instead of 10.00%.
This is not necessary in our case since utils.human_number takes care
of the unwanted (not all) decimals for us (the original number is always
rounded by utils.human_number).
|
|
The functions 'formatFloat' and 'formatInteger' now format
a number x like utils.human_number when a predicate 'humanReadable'
is available in options and humanReadable(x) is true.
|
|
Before this fix, in form view, when a datepicker was not visible (because
they were on another page or literally invisible), when the user pressed
TAB and the datepicker was positionned after the current field in the
form, it was capturing the focus during the activate phase of the
navigation_move.
This is not correct for invisible elements.
After this fix, only focusable datepickers get the focus during the
activation phase of the navigation_move.
co-author: aab-odoo (aab@odoo.com)
|
|
Purpose
=======
The 'CREATE' operation lacked the possibility to handle multiple records.
The 'context' parameter is now an array of dict that contains the context for each new record.
This is usefull when you want to create multiple records into a list in a single call.
Please note that the 'default_get' is still called once for each record in an async way.
|
|
Task #1871557
Purpose
=======
- Configure a product from a sales order as easily as in the ecommerce
The backend uses the same template as the frontend to configure a products and its options
- Display optionnal products of optionnal products in the "sale options" section
- Allow adding exlusions to some combinations of the product and/or
to some combinations of the optionnal and accessory products
Specification
=============
PHASE I
1. Improve the "Add to cart" with optional products
- When you add an option to cart, move the product to the cart & show the options of this option
- Don't open the option wizard if no option available (in case this module becomes generic,
it's better to skip this step when it's not needed)
- Display the options right under their related product in the cart
2. Do not allow to add the product as an optional product for itself
Why ?
- No functional sense
- Creates issues in the add to cart wizard
3. Exclude some attribute combinations within the product or with related options and accessory products
- Rename VARIANT PRICES button -> CONFIGURE VARIANTS
- When you click this button and select a value, open form view rather than inline edition
- Form view of variant values:
- Attribute
- Value
- HTML Color Index
- Attribute Price Extra
- Not Compatible with: o2m tab with 2 fields: Product AND Attribute Value (of this product)
[m2m tag selection]
- in any new line, autocomplete the current product by default
- Tooltip: A list of product and attribute values that you want to exclude for
this product's attribue value. Also applies on optionnal and accessory products.
4. New option to configure a product in a sales order line
- This option is only visible if the corresponding option is activated in the sales settings
- It opens a wizard to select a product template, configure related attribute values
and select optional products (based on frontend view)
- Attributes not compatible with other selected attributes should not be selectable
- Must work like in the frontend
|
|
This commit fixes a few issues with the previous implementation of the
automatic addition of new lines in x2many inside forms
1. Before this commit, when there is a change of mode in a formview
`edit` -> `readonly` -> `edit`, there may be some cases that
mistakenly and automatically opens a modal.
This case occurs in a form view with a x2many field whose 1st inner
focusable element opens a modal (e.g. "Add an item").
In `edit` mode:
1. Open this modal from the x2many
2. Close the modal
3. Change mode to `readonly`
4. Change mode to `edit`
> the same modal is automatically open.
This is due to the tracking of the last activated field that persists
after a change of mode. Since the last activated field in the 1st
`edit` is the x2many, it is granted the focus at the beginning of the
2nd `edit`, which automatically opens the modal.
This commit fixes the issue by resetting the tracking of the last
activated field when there is a change of mode. As a result, at the
beginning of the 2nd `edit`, the focus should always be on the 1st
field.
2. Before this commit, if the focus was moved out of the form (to a modal
for instance) then back, the form would re-activate the last field, which
is the x2many and would re-add a new line. This behavior is not correct
and now going back from a modal to a form does not add a new line.
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn <aku@odoo.com>
|
|
Before this change, when the focus was on the first field on a x2many
field, and the user pressed TAB, the line would be discarded and the
focus moved to the next field (at the level of the x2many) in the form.
This was an issue because if the first field was required, the focus
could not be moved out of the field with TAB so the user had to discard
the line manually (with ESC) before moving to the next field
This change works with 2 changes:
1. detecting if a line is dirty (has been modified by the user) and at
the end of the line, decide to either
- discard the line and move the next field, if the line is not dirty
- commit the line and add a new line, if the line is dirty
2. allow users to use TAB through required field inside x2many so they
can easilly go to the end of the line.
Task id : 1872248
|