| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When creating a SO line and clicking on search more for product_id
Before this commit, every user had the button "Create" to create a product.product
After this commit, only user in groups that actually can create a product have the button
OPW 1910371
closes odoo/odoo#28924
|
|
|
|
The reference widget is expecting a models list as selection attribute
in the field declaration.
It does not exist in the case of the char field.
Support for char fields was added to allow for external identifiers,
but it only works in readonly.
As a consequence, it tracebacks in Edit mode when used in studio.
We thusly remove char field from the list of supported fields.
opw 1892602
closes odoo/odoo#27708
|
|
|
|
Suppose you select a customer for a sale order.
You type the beginning of his name "think", and a name_search is triggered
which finds matching results, with first result "Think Big Systems".
There are three ways to select it: click, enter or tab.
Now there can be a warning set on this customer
("Bad client, only accept cash", or "good client, offer discount").
In that case, clicking on tab would trigger the onchange displaying the warning,
but it would also set floating to true, which means a dialog to create client
"think" would appear.
This happens if the onchange is delayed, and thus the call to reset the floating
state is triggered only after the focusout completed, instead of before.
Coauthored with @aab-odoo
opw 1866619
opw 1874475
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Go on a SO and click on "Send by email"
- Remove the attachment and click on "Add an attachment"
- Choose an attachment A and remove it by clicking on the cross
- Click on "Add an attachment" and choose the attachment A
Bug:
The attachment didn't appear in the modal.
opw:1862482
|
|
|
|
|
|
With a better href, many2one in readonly mode can be opened in new tab.
Related to task: #32919
|
|
|
|
Assume a one2many field inside a form, displaying field A in its
list view, and a field B in its (dialog) form view. Moreover, there
is an action button in the dialog, which updates the value of B.
Before this rev., B wasn't correctly reloaded when the button was
clicked, because the BasicModel reloaded the fields on the list
view (i.e. field A), whereas it should reload the fields in both
views.
This fix is twofold. First, we force the viewType to 'form' when
the record is reloaded, instead of the default ('list'), so that
fields in the form view are correctly reloaded. Second, when we
open the form view in the dialog, we add the fields of the list
view to the dict of fields of the form view, so that the form
is aware of those fields and can ask the model to reload them
(still without displaying them).
Fixes #24189
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the reference widget, the focus was always on the input (many2one) even
though the first select (with the model) was not set.
Thanks to @kaerdsar for the original PR.
Partially closes #24070
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consider the following scenario involving a one2many list (non
editable) inside a form view:
- click on 'Add an item', a model opens,
- fill the fields and click on 'Save & Close',
- reopen the freshly created record,
- maybe make some changes (this is optional, but makes sense),
- click on 'Save & New',
- fill the fields and click on 'Save & Close',
-> the second created record isn't added to the list.
The problem comes from the fact that when the dialog is opened for
the second time (in this case by clicking on a record), the 'save'
handler registers an 'UPDATE' command. While this is correct for
the 'Save & New' click (as we update an existing record), this
isn't for the second record which doesn't exist yet, and thus
requires an 'ADD' command.
This rev. ensures that the two cases are handled in the 'save'
handler given to the dialog.
OPW 1829723
|
|
The goal of this commit is to allow fast entry of the same model using
the keyboard for navigating through the form once, by blocking the user
from advancing in the form if there is a required field or once they
went through the form once to get them to a primary action (button)
This commit includes the following changes
1) Enable moving forward from field to field using the TAB key
2) Entering the one to many and many to many using the TAB key
a. When entering it, set the focus on the "add new line" link or
button
b. When adding a new line, set the focus on the field visible
editable field of the new line
c. Discard adding a new line with ESC key
d. If the user leaves the first field empty and uses TAB, we
will cancel the adding of a new line and move to the next
field of the form
3) When a field is required and not filled in, do not allow the user
to move out of the field using the TAB key (the user is still
allowed to use the mouse though), mark the field as invalid
instead
4) After going though the form once, using the TAB key on the last
field will move the focus to the first primary button of the page
5) When the focus is on a primary button (EDIT/SAVE), the user cannot
move the focus forward using the TAB key. Hitting TAB again will
display a tooltip telling to hit ENTER to activate the button.
The mouse is still available to move the focus.
6) When the user saves, the focus is placed on the first primary
button of the form renderer (like VALIDATE for a new invoice)
7) On dialogs, primary buttons should stop the users from moving out
of them, and showing a popup if the user tries
8) When closing a dialog, the focus will be moved back to the widget
that opened it.
This commit does not include the following features
1) Navigation with the keyboard on a selection one to man
2) Navigate between tabs in a form using the keyboard
3) Cancelling the adding of a new line in a many to many using the
ESC key do not set the focus correctly
4) Enhancing the focusses fields (like blue underline)
|
|
|
|
Before this commit, when some records were created from an `onchange`,
we have the following weird behaviour:
Suppose that this record has some required fields that are empty.
When we click on this record, then somewhere else, the record
disappears from the list.
This is because the records contains invalid fields, and it is wrongfully
assuming that the record to be discarded comes from "Add an item".
A previous commit [1] fixed a bit this issue with `default_get`, but since
it relied on a fragile heuristic, we decide to apply the correct fix with
this commit.
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/b09f0c99be2b13d33986414485556d87da186d65
|
|
For x2many relational fields(of type kanban), we shoud be able to set custom label for
'Create / Add' button by adding 'create_text' node option on particual field from xml.
Right now, 'create_text' is only handled for many2many fields, preventing users to set
custom label for one2many fields.
This commit allows users to set Create Button label for both m2m and o2m fields.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The issue here is quite simple. If we are editing a multipage one2many
field, then we click on the pager, we need to properly unselect the
current row.
If we do not do that, then we can enter invalid data. For example,
assume that there is a readonly field. We click on add, it creates a
(virtual) record with no value for that field. When we click on the
pager, we select the next page, and bypass all validation.
|
|
When we are in the process of adding a record, we do not want to update
the pager count. The reason is that if the user is at the limit (so,
1-40/40, no pager visible), then click on add, there will be a pager
shown with 1-40/41. Now, imagine that the record currently being added
as a required field, and the user clicks on the pager. In that case, we
need to discard the newly added record (bringing the total back to 40),
then move to next page, which does not exist anymore.
So, to fix this issue, we simply consider that a record being added
does not count, from the point of view of the pager.
|
|
The widget statusbar was using an attribute `clickable` on the field widget
to define if the statusbar was clickable.
This attribute is in fact not a field attribute but a widget option so it
has been moved accordingly.
Note that a retro-compatibility adapation is done in the field widget.
|
|
|
|
some objects-
)
|
|
|
|
In some cases, the footer in a form view dialog could be duplicated.
The reason was that the form view was rerendered completely, footer
included, by the renderer, out of the formcontroller control (it is the
formcontroller's job to move the footer buttons to the footer).
A possible fix is to work on the form renderer to make it aware that the footer
buttons are expected to be only rendered once, but it has the disadvantage to
be a fix specific to this issue, and any other form view behaviour with some
side effects may have the same issue.
This commit tries to prevent the form view from rerendering itself
completely in those cases. This also has the disadvantage of possibly
not being a complete fix, if some edge cases are missed. However, I
have the feeling that we still want to avoid rerendering the full view
if possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
From a form view (say Bill of materials)
Edit the form
Click on a bom line
Click on the external button that makes the product form pop up
change the order of suppliers on that product
Before this commit, a JS traceback was raised
This was because the changing object was not present in the localData that the Model object holds
or more accurately, it was not the **right** model object that was targetted
and this was due to the propagation of the resequence event
After this commit, no error is thrown, and the resequencing works as expected
OPW 807196
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two attempts of dealing with sorting (and resequencing) in tabbed (multi-pages)
x2many editable lists (see odoo/odoo@c2563db and odoo/odoo@983c7ae) have been
previously done, using a static attribute (`keepChangesUnsorted`) on the
datapoint.
This solution sadly only covers both cases separately, not if they are combined.
Morever, onchanges were not correctly managed in neither of these two cases.
A new approach is used here, by "freezing" and "unfreezing" the datapoint when
needed, which is more flexible.
Some modifications have been introduced:
- when ordering a x2many, all records are now considered (and not only the
records on the current page) ; an additional read is thus done on the sorted
field for all records in the x2many relation
- `setSort` is now asynchronous as a `read` might be needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
In many2many lists, the remove record from the widget is a trash bin.
It is confusing, as people feel they are deleting it when they are
only unlinking it.
So in many2many, we propose to change the trash icon by a 'X'.
This icon appears in many2many relations and in many2many widgets:
even though hr.expense.sheet defines the expense lines as a one2many,
it uses a many2many widget, so we use a 'X' instead of the trash bin.
To avoid ambiguity, we decided to rename 'delete' to 'remove'.
|
|
[FIX] web: Fix column_invisible issue
This commit fixes an issue with the column_invisible attribute.
When we choose product variant for BOM for any particular product,
at that time from the BOM Lines column "Apply on Variants" is hidden,
but when we unset product variant from BOM Form,
at that time the column 'Variants" set to visible. but in this case, it is set to hidden always.
PR 21693, OPW 779555
|
|
[FIX] web: Fix column_invisible issue
This commit fixes an issue with the column_invisible attribute.
When we choose product variant for BOM for any particular product,
at that time from the BOM Lines column "Apply on Variants" is hidden,
but when we unset product variant from BOM Form,
at that time the column 'Variants" set to visible. but in this case, it is set to hidden always.
PR 21693, OPW 779555
|
|
When modifying files the a widget FieldMany2ManyBinaryMultiFiles would
not keep its metadata (currently associating attachment to [url,
allowUnlink]) up with current value.
So with an attachment added after init:
- clicking on it would error (because link is wrong)
- deleting it would unlink attachment originating from from onchange
The expected behavior is:
- being able to download attachments
- not unlinking attachment originating from onchange
and this is what this commit fixes.
opw-787746
closes #21813
|
|
Before this commit, the way mode was handled was not optimal. The end
result was correct (the widget were properly created/displayed in
edit/readonly as required), but useless work was done. In particular,
if we have list/x2manys with widgets and modifiers, it could happen that
widgets were created in edit mode, then destroyed and recreated in
readonly mode.
This could happen in some important views, for example, any view with a
field many2many_tags with a readonly modifiers (pretty much all views
handling taxes)
In this commit, we add a 'editable' attribute to list renderer. This is
necessary, because the list renderer is not actually editable when it is
in a x2many in a form view which is in readonly mode. Also, we need to
manage the distinction between the fact that a list view is editable,
and the fact that some widgets are created in edit and other in readonly
mode, depending on modifiers, and on which line is being edited.
We also add a benchmark (courtesy of CHM) to be able to measure the
performance impact of edit/readonly/onchange in a larger form view.
Before this commit, running this form benchmark on my machine gave a
number of 0.4 op/sec, and after, it increases to 1.26 op/sec, so a
pretty large improvement.
|
|
|
|
|
