| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The docstring says they are boolean, but they actually aren't
(e.g. edit="0" in the arch would lead to activeActions.edit=0).
This could cause issue if that value is used to toggle a class
with jQuery, as in this case the flag argument *must* be a boolean.
|
|
Expose to public the variable FieldX2Many.
Task ID: 1910385
closes odoo/odoo#30512
|
|
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#30566
|
|
|
|
|
|
This branch introduces a large-scale reorganization of the
component tree generated by the web client. The short version is
that now, the control panel is a child of the view controller and
no longer a sibling. Graphically (and simplified), we go from
this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
/ \
controlPanel viewController
/ \
to this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
|
viewController
/ | \
ControlPanelController
/ \
CPRenderer CPModel
The motivation is that this work moves the code where it should be.
Before this commit, it was kind of weird to have code in the
controllers to render buttons outside of their root node (in
renderButtons). Also, the action manager had to take care of
coordinating search view states between view transitions.
So, this work simplifies the code. It also makes it easier to
extend. We see day after day that Odoo needs to take care of more
complex UI needs, and in many cases, these needs were quite
difficult to implement (we prefer spaghettis in our plates, not in
our code). The changes in this branch should open the way to
implement these features.
For example,
- it will now be easy to add the possibility of views (for example,
the search view or a new ControlPanel view) to add custom buttons
(of type action or object) in the control panel.
- Another need will be to serialize/ restore the state of the
search view across action boundaries (needed by the dashboard).
- Another example is the possibility for views to customize easily
the presence/absence of sub menus (filters/groupbys/favorites/
time range/...)
- Another need is an easier way for views/client action to customize
their control panel.
This commit also contains a large rewrite of the search view (so it
is more inline with our architecture and easier to maintain).
Part of task 1893568
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
When creating a SO line and clicking on search more for product_id
Before this commit, every user had the button "Create" to create a product.product
After this commit, only user in groups that actually can create a product have the button
OPW 1910371
closes odoo/odoo#28924
|
|
|
|
The reference widget is expecting a models list as selection attribute
in the field declaration.
It does not exist in the case of the char field.
Support for char fields was added to allow for external identifiers,
but it only works in readonly.
As a consequence, it tracebacks in Edit mode when used in studio.
We thusly remove char field from the list of supported fields.
opw 1892602
closes odoo/odoo#27708
|
|
|
|
Let's assume a form view with field A and B (a one2many list), with
a column with attrs column_invisible depending on A.
If the user sets A manually, everything works fine (the column is
hidden/shown directly). However, if A is updated by an onchange
(e.g. depending on the number of rows in B), it doesn't. This
rev. fixes that issue.
Related to Issue: 1851451
Co-authored-by: Priyanka Kaakdiya <pka@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Targets commit d3530eb07e24278117ab396ecb86a59deecc312d
Purpose
=======
[Follow up AL review]
Removed the default_get override in the sale_order_line model.
- The default values to create records are now specified by pefixing them with "default_" in the JS.
That will use the built-in framework method, which is more simple/clean.
- The "list_editable_renderer.js" file for the product configurator was removed and its content is now merged within
the SectionAndNoteListRenderer.
Updated fields:
- [sale_order_line in sale/sale.py] "product_no_variant_attribute_values" to "product_no_variant_attribute_value_ids"
|
|
Purpose
=======
The 'CREATE' operation lacked the possibility to handle multiple records.
The 'context' parameter is now an array of dict that contains the context for each new record.
This is usefull when you want to create multiple records into a list in a single call.
Please note that the 'default_get' is still called once for each record in an async way.
|
|
Task #1871557
Purpose
=======
- Configure a product from a sales order as easily as in the ecommerce
The backend uses the same template as the frontend to configure a products and its options
- Display optionnal products of optionnal products in the "sale options" section
- Allow adding exlusions to some combinations of the product and/or
to some combinations of the optionnal and accessory products
Specification
=============
PHASE I
1. Improve the "Add to cart" with optional products
- When you add an option to cart, move the product to the cart & show the options of this option
- Don't open the option wizard if no option available (in case this module becomes generic,
it's better to skip this step when it's not needed)
- Display the options right under their related product in the cart
2. Do not allow to add the product as an optional product for itself
Why ?
- No functional sense
- Creates issues in the add to cart wizard
3. Exclude some attribute combinations within the product or with related options and accessory products
- Rename VARIANT PRICES button -> CONFIGURE VARIANTS
- When you click this button and select a value, open form view rather than inline edition
- Form view of variant values:
- Attribute
- Value
- HTML Color Index
- Attribute Price Extra
- Not Compatible with: o2m tab with 2 fields: Product AND Attribute Value (of this product)
[m2m tag selection]
- in any new line, autocomplete the current product by default
- Tooltip: A list of product and attribute values that you want to exclude for
this product's attribue value. Also applies on optionnal and accessory products.
4. New option to configure a product in a sales order line
- This option is only visible if the corresponding option is activated in the sales settings
- It opens a wizard to select a product template, configure related attribute values
and select optional products (based on frontend view)
- Attributes not compatible with other selected attributes should not be selectable
- Must work like in the frontend
|
|
This commit fixes a few issues with the previous implementation of the
automatic addition of new lines in x2many inside forms
1. Before this commit, when there is a change of mode in a formview
`edit` -> `readonly` -> `edit`, there may be some cases that
mistakenly and automatically opens a modal.
This case occurs in a form view with a x2many field whose 1st inner
focusable element opens a modal (e.g. "Add an item").
In `edit` mode:
1. Open this modal from the x2many
2. Close the modal
3. Change mode to `readonly`
4. Change mode to `edit`
> the same modal is automatically open.
This is due to the tracking of the last activated field that persists
after a change of mode. Since the last activated field in the 1st
`edit` is the x2many, it is granted the focus at the beginning of the
2nd `edit`, which automatically opens the modal.
This commit fixes the issue by resetting the tracking of the last
activated field when there is a change of mode. As a result, at the
beginning of the 2nd `edit`, the focus should always be on the 1st
field.
2. Before this commit, if the focus was moved out of the form (to a modal
for instance) then back, the form would re-activate the last field, which
is the x2many and would re-add a new line. This behavior is not correct
and now going back from a modal to a form does not add a new line.
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn <aku@odoo.com>
|
|
For Name field or M2O, gives a list of companies
Data comes from Odoo IAP Service
|
|
This rev. is similar to db9b91ff, but treats the x2many case.
Calls to the 'commitChange' function of renderers must not be done
inside a mutex, mainly since 241704536, as they could end up in a
deadlock. For x2manys, it was actually the case in practice in
Inventory > Operations > Inventory Adjustments > Create > select
'One product only' > select a product > try to edit the real
quantity in the editable list > focusout > deadlock.
The reason why the deadlock occurred in this view and not in, e.g.
sale.order, is due to the presence of the field_float_scannable
widget. Indeed, the barcode engine intercepts input events and
manually re-triggers them. As a consequence, the 'change' event is
not triggered on the field, and it does not notify the environment
of its new value by itself, until the field x2many asks it to
commit its value. Note that this might be an issue as well, as
onchanges are thus not triggered.
Task 1878254
|
|
Rev. f241441 recently added the possibiliy to define custom
controls (instead of the single 'Add a line') in editable list
views. However, it didn't take into account keyboard navigation.
Suppose that the focus is on the field preceeding the list, and
the user clicks on TAB, the code assumed that there was only one
control, and focused it. However, when there were several control,
the last one was focused (which is typically the less common one),
and there was no way to navigate to the others.
This rev. focuses the first control by default, and allows to
navigate through controls with RIGHT and LEFT. Pressing TAB still
moves out of the list, to the next field.
Note that i'm not happy with this fix, as the logic doesn't seem
to be in the right place. Indeed, the notion of controls is the
concern of the editable list, not the x2many field, so the list
should handle this logic by itself. Unfortenately, this is not that
easy to change, as for now the list doesn't even know that we are
navigating to/from its control(s), until we click on it/them.
Changing that will be for later, in master.
We also did a linting pass on the concerned code.
Task 1878254
|
|
Before this rev., if the user clicked on a tag to open the color
picker, and then clicked in the dropdown, but not on a color, the
color picker closed itself, and it was no longer possible to open
it again.
This issue came with the migration to BS4 and its following fixes.
As the color picker is now a classical BS dropdown, it closes
itself automatically, so we don't need to manually close it on
focusout.
Task 1878254.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This rev. removes a deadlock situation that could *theoretically*
occur, but that was actually hard to reach in practice.
Before saving a record (e.g. in a form view), all field widgets
are asked to commit their value (in case they wouldn't have
notified the model yet, e.g. because the user just changed them).
For instance, let's assume that the user fills an input field, and
then triggers the save. In practice, by triggering the save, it
will force the widget to notify the model of its new value (because
it looses the focus). This is also the case using keyboard
navigation, as it actually simulates clicks. So when the widget is
asked to commit its value right after, it has nothing more to
commit.
This is fortunate, because if it actually had something to commit,
we would end up in a deadlock ('commitChanges' is executed in a
mutex, and if the widget triggers a new value, '_applyChange' is
called, and is executed in that mutex as well). In fact, executing
'commitChanges' in a mutex is useless, as '_applyChange', which is
called when a widget has something to commit, is already executed
in the mutex.
So this rev. removes the use of the mutex in 'commitChanges'.
Doing so broke several Many2One tests, because they wrongly relied
on the presence of the mutex for scenarios where the user quick
creates a relational record, and then directly saves (before the
relational record is actually created). We thus handled that
usecase properly to make the tests pass.
Task 1878254.
|
|
Suppose you select a customer for a sale order.
You type the beginning of his name "think", and a name_search is triggered
which finds matching results, with first result "Think Big Systems".
There are three ways to select it: click, enter or tab.
Now there can be a warning set on this customer
("Bad client, only accept cash", or "good client, offer discount").
In that case, clicking on tab would trigger the onchange displaying the warning,
but it would also set floating to true, which means a dialog to create client
"think" would appear.
This happens if the onchange is delayed, and thus the call to reset the floating
state is triggered only after the focusout completed, instead of before.
Coauthored with @aab-odoo
opw 1866619
opw 1874475
|
|
* mail, calendar
- Fix traceback when clicking on a tag without color field (introduced
in recent changes)
- Properly allow to delete tags on firefox (a button obviously cannot
contain another button)
Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/26547
Thanks to @hbh-odoo
|
|
In a one2many, pressing ENTER or TAB from a required input (of type text or char) that is on the last editable column of its line would fail to navigate to next line.
The issue was that the validation of the required field would happen before the change to its value was actually applied.
This commit fixes it.
PR: #26430
Task: 1869469
|
|
Bug revealed with BS4.
|
|
Currently, to remove link of x2m field from any record, sometimes there's no way.
For example, if we are on mobile and open any Quotation, it's linked quotation lines
are automatically converted in kanban, and there is no way to delete a line from
that quotation. However, in some of the manually designed kanban, there is special 'x'
for removing / unlinking x2m record, for example, Contacts of Partner.
This commit makes the behavior more consistent. During edition (mobile and desktop), if
a view dialog is opened on click of x2m field, it will have one 'Remove' button (based
on user rights) on right side of dialog footer, allowing users to delete / unlink the
record. Moreover, in mobile, the modal is opened fullscreen, with sticky header and
footer.
Related Task# : 31641
Closes PR #15857
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
|
|
example: <field name="product_id" options="{'no_open': True}" readonly="1"/>
This has been broken by rev. 43d21dd9c due to misplaced parentheses
(an empty object in javascript being truthy).
|
|
This adds a button to import several bills from the accounting dashboard: will create a new vendor bill for each, with the file attached to it. That file will be visible in the chatter (in enterprise) and allow easilly completion/encoding of it. This task also comes along with the import/export of xml files attached to the PDF files created from the invoice report.
Was task 1859277
Was PR #26339
|
|
From this rev., the empty value isn't available in the options of
required selection fields, thus preventing the user to unset it.
Related to task #49262
Closes #24404
|
|
The FieldMany2ManyTags uses FieldMany2One in its implementation.
Before this commit, the field attributes were not propagated to the sub field.
In particular, the attribute `can_create` is useful to be propagated.
|
|
This rev. allows to instantiate a FieldMany2one Widget with option
'noOpen' (which hides the external button allowing to open the
related record in a dialog).
This option already existed, but it had to be specified in the
nodeOptions (i.e. in the view arch), which is not convenient for
standalone fields for which there is no view.
Part of task 1853490
|
|
Purpose
=======
If the model on a reference fields is not modified from the interface
by the user but by the server, the selection is not correctly
recomputed on the interface.
Specification
=============
By calling super first on the '_reset' method, the new model
is taken into account when resetting the selection.
|
|
Before this commit, the only way to deal with the same tax either with price included or not was to duplicate it, one with the price included checked.
This commit add a new boolean on the reconciliation widget propositions to decide if the tax must be used like a price included tax or not.
PR: 17040
task: 32717
|
|
Before this commit, Odoo used checkboxes in three different ways:
- A simple <input type="checkbox"/>, mainly in the frontend. The style
is browser dependant.
- Same as above but with the BS3, checkbox structure. The style is still
the same, but the alignement is supposed to be better (which is not
always the case).
- The Odoo official structure:
```
<div class="o_checkbox">
<input type="checkbox"/>
<span/>
</div>
```
which allows to have a cross-browser checkbox style and correct
alignements.
The goal after this commit is to only use the BS4 *custom* checkbox
structure to achieve the same goal as our official structure (and
remove that one):
```
<div class="custom-control custom-checkbox">
<input type="checkbox" class="custom-control-input" id="customCheck1">
<label class="custom-control-label" for="customCheck1">...</label>
</div>
```
/!\ Labels are now required (use a zero-width space if necessary)
|
|
BS4 "btn-default" class was replaced with "btn-secondary", which makes
more sense.
|
|
This allows a custom widget to cleanly override the Renderer of a X2Many.
PR #25209
|
|
The default "add a line" button creates a new line with the default values from the model. Sometimes we want to create a new line with different default values (or more generally a customized context), which is possible with this commit. Moreover it is possible to create multiple buttons for multiple default values/contexts.
This works both for in-line creation ("editable=") and dialog creation.
The new tags are:
<control> defines custom controls for the current view.
Does not support any attribute, but can have children:
<create> adds a button to create a new element on the current list.
This makes sense when the parent tree view is inside a One2many field.
If any create is defined, it will overwrite the default "add a line" button.
For more information and example, have a look at the Views documentation.
Technically, the commit will:
- parse the new XML tags (+ add appropriate validation)
- display the buttons based on the XML
- on button click/keyboard: pull up the additional context information from the button event up to the default_get
- add unit tests
- add documentation
PR #25209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Go on a SO and click on "Send by email"
- Remove the attachment and click on "Add an attachment"
- Choose an attachment A and remove it by clicking on the cross
- Click on "Add an attachment" and choose the attachment A
Bug:
The attachment didn't appear in the modal.
opw:1862482
|
|
The sequence had a static default value, but when there is an handle, it's important that new items are added at the top or the bottom of the list.
This is a rare case where the defaul_get from the server will be ignored by the view for a certain field.
This will work:
- both in editable mode (inline) and in dialog mode,
- both for X2Many and standalone list.
|
