| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Refactoring of the control panel with the Owl framework.
The MVC structure of the control panel has been changed to a 'component <-> model'
relationship. As such:
- Removed the old control panel: view/model/controller/renderer
- Created a new Owl Component (ControlPanel)
- Created a new class: the Model (an Owl Store did not fit here) and a newly
designed ControlPanelModel extending it
Refactored all inner subcomponents, including:
- Pager
- ActionMenus (peviously SideBar)
- Filter menu
> Custom filter item
- Group by menu
> Custom group by item
> Removal of groupby_menu_mixin (and refactored graph controller in sibling commit)
- Time range menu
- Favorite menu
> Custom favorite item
> Moved the favorite menu registry to the favorite_menu file
- Search bar
> Removed and splitted auto-completion dropdown logic between the new SearchBar
Component (descriptions) and to the new ControlPanelModel (domains).
The templates (all in web/base.xml) have been adapted to the new standards. Most
of the DOM structure remains unchanged with some occasional improvements (replace
hiding with not rendering, removed pointless wrapper divs, etc.).
Part of task 2196029
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
|
|
In a list view, select some records (either by selecting them one
by one, or by clicking on the header to select all records), then
click on an action (except for the special case of 'Export') in the
sidebar. Some information about the selection is put into the
context:
- active_ids: the ids of the selected records (only those of the
current page)
- active_domain: the current domain
However, before this commit, there were no way to determine whether
the user checked the header checkbox (i.e. all records), or some of
them individually.
This commit adds the information, with a 'select_all' key in the
context.
Note that this is a quick solution, as we need it right now for an
accounting usecase. A more elaborate solution, which will allow the
user to choose whether he wants to apply the action on the selected
ids or on the whole domain, will be developped soon.
Part of Task 2146469
closes odoo/odoo#44248
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
|
|
Part of task 1896658
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Christophe Matthieu <chm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: David Monjoie <dmo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: svs-odoo <svs@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt <vsc@odoo.com>
|
|
task-id : 1873908
|
|
- The dropdown structure was simplified, allowing to get rid of the
3-levels structure induced by <ul/> elements and dropdowns can now
contain anything. The class 'dropdown-item' is now mandatory for
each dropdown clickable element. The class 'dropdown-item-text' can
be used to add same padding and style but without making the element
have a clickable look.
- Dividers now use the class 'dropdown-divider'
- The way dropdowns are opened and hidden also changed (before the
'open' class was added on the `.dropdown-menu` parent, now the
'show' class is added on both the `.dropdown-menu` parent and the
`.dropdown-menu` itself).
- JS-wise, no click event handlers can be put on `.dropdown-toggle`
elements anymore (instead, use handlers for dropdown events).
- Carets are automatically put on `.dropdown-toggle` elements, so this
commit replaces the `.caret` elements with this. This feature was
possible to disable but would prevent us from adding a caret with
scss. Also, this simplifies the DOM. The 'o-no-caret' class was also
introduced to allow using the 'dropdown-toggle' class on non-caret
elements.
- Also adapt the scss to use $caret-width instead of $caret-width-base
|
|
The pyeval name is quite confusing, given that there is already an eval
and an evaluate function in py.js, and that the web.pyeval exports two
evaluate functions.
Since this file is more about odoo specific customization to py.js, it
is renamed in py_utils to better express its intended use.
|
|
- Fix the toolbar behaviour since there is no more dataset in the widget.
- Improve the communication beetwen the controller and the toolbar.
- Move the code linked to the document upload in the right file.
- Adapt the tests to mock the search_read done by ´document´ addon
- Adapt the mock server to be able to give a custom toolbar action
|
|
The RPC system was not completely satisfactory, we decided to prepare
the future and do it properly. This commit introduces the new rpc
system, which replace the previous new one. We now simply have a
method, this._rpc, which takes a dictionary of parameters. The idea is
that depending on the parameters, it is able to add correct default
value when necessary.
For situations where we don't have the this._rpc method, we can use the
rpc.query method, which takes the same arguments, but directly calls
ajax.rpc instead of triggering up some events.
|
|
The _rpc method is now the preferred method to do a rpc, so we need to
update all calls.
|
|
We want to remove data.js, but we still need the CompoundContext class,
so we take it out, and rename it 'Context'
|
|
This commit introduce a full redesign of all JS views. We started
basically from scratch. The goal was to unify all the various views
under a common framework, to make them testable, to make then usable in
different conditions (in studio, or in the frontend), and to make our
lives easier.
Some important points are:
- we introduced new coding guidelines (camelCase, 80 chars width, ...)
- we have a brand new testing framework (still QUnit based)
- kanban view moved to the web addon
- calendar view (formerly web_calender) moved to web as well
- the tree view was removed
- all new code should be documented
We hope that this code is the start of a new era for the Odoo web
client, we want to have a high quality codebase, well documented, well
tested, well designed.
Work done by the framework team: mostly aab, ged, chm, dmo, qsm
|
