| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The function _compute_parent_rating_percentage_satisfaction used the creation
date of the rating to compute the percentage.
However when a client give a new rating, it updates the old one.
As a result it doesn't give the recent satisfaction percentage,
but the satisfaction percentage of recently created tickets.
In other words recently angry clients from old projects would not appear.
Similarly this method is somewhat reimplemented directly in SQL in the rating
route, which happens to be in the project controller.
opw 1921486
closes odoo/odoo#30752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#28678
|
|
If the selected project has no task (e.g. new project), still make a search.
The previous code was making a KeyError on the filterby as the read_group
returned no result.
Introduced at d5bc0e57cd9288dc7
As a portal, a user may have access to some projects (when set explicitly as
the customer on the project configuration).
Make this with a first search and add the other tasks also with the read_group
in case the user has access to some tasks but not the project.
Fixes #27457
closes odoo/odoo#27581
|
|
The search on project were done as sudo with a domain matching the
"project_task_rule_portal" rule. This commits remove the sudo call
and corresponding domains.
This replace lpe's fix b8fe404e, and user connected to portal to see
his tasks, avoiding an error during crawling tests:
Error use case:
User try to access a task list from /my/projects with a filter on a project.
The project filter does not exist in task list since the rules applied are for
portal user -> an error is raised
Now, project list on /my/projects and the filter available on /my/tasks should
be the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before this commit, on /my/tasks, in the filter dropdown, every project that had visibility = portal was displayed
regardless of whether the portal user was a follower or not
After this commit, we search project in a more clever manner
OPW 1878187
closes #26615
|
|
|
|
Before this commit, the method _document_check_access would succeed if it was called with a non-existing id.
Now it will raise a MissingError.
PR: none
Task: none
|
|
Purpose
=======
- Quickly share the url to someone else (a client, a colleague,...)
- Ensure that the recipient can access at least
the portal view of the shared record.
- Typically used when a client cannot retrieve the mail to access his order.
The share link can be used in this case.
Specifications
==============
For any object inheriting form portal.mixin:
- Add a button SHARE (not visible in edit mode)
- When clicking on this button, a popup opens with :
- A warning message for tasks and projects only (see below)
- the link (like in gmail) that can be copied
- Recipients
- mail composer (with preselected template) ==> see below
- button [Send Link] [Copy Link] Discard
- After sharing document, put internal note like
"Document shared to xyz,...." with template message
- Anyone with the link, even anonymous user (not logged in) can have access
to the document with the access token provided in the url.
Impacted models:
- account.invoice (Community)
- project.project (Community)
- project.task (Community)
- purchase.order (Community)
- sale.order (Community)
- helpdesk.ticket (Enterprise)
Warning messages and access rules:
Allowed :
- SO canceled or draft will be accessible with the link
with access_token
- If the customer account is B2B (signup not enabled), the recipient
will anyway see the document as the user specifically wants the
recipient to see the document.
Restrictions :
- For Project and Task, if the privacy is not public, then, there is a
contradiction between the access_token mechanism
and the privacy of the document.
- A warning message will be displayed in the share wizard to inform the
user if the document cannot be visible by the recipients and to
ask him to set the privacy to 'Visible by following customer'.
The send button will, in that case, be hidden.
- To avoid to block the share for a new project, default privacy value
is now set to 'Visible by followong customer'
Technical implementation
========================
- Move the access_token mechanism (field + methods + mail controller)
to the portal.mixin to be able to use it in a generic way for each object
inheriting the portal.mixin
- Generalise a part of the _*model*_get_page_view_values method
into a single one in portal
- Generalize the _*model*_check_access into the portal controller of the
portal module
- Remove the init_column + default value for the access_token
> old records have an access_token,
> new one won't but it will be generated on demand via the get_access_token
Done for performance reasons
- Add share button into action menu separately. + kanban view context menu
(except for task and project where button not in action menu but 'simple'
button for task and project because other modules already provide action
to send documents by email, which is not the case for project and task.)
- Add a sign_token used to authentify the recipient in the portal view chatter,
if any. The message will be posted as if the user was logged in.
- Set the _get_share_url as private for security reason
- Add a redirect parameter to _get_share_url to get
If false : The direct portal view url
If True : The redirect url (mail/view/?)
- Cleaning up unnecessary code
- Bug fix :
- Before, if user was not logged and record had partner_id,
if partner id was null, post message was done as admin.
Now, the post message is done as public user.
- If the user had an uid but had no access_token, he could be able
to gain the access token of the record.
check_access_rights was missing in the get_access_action.
Task ID : 30985
Closes #25629
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the portal user, go on /my/task/1
(obviously provided that this task doesn't belong to portal user)
Before this commit, there is a 500 error
After this commit, the exceptions are handled and throws a 403
OPW 1867795
closes #25951
|
|
Note: 1aacc962620982528a3dfc90d2c1dd0027359375 has been ignored and will
be forward-ported later
|
|
|
|
- Searches made on tickets using the portal aren't kept when changing page.
This commit makes sure the search is kept.
OPW-1857033
|
|
Remove some code that was kept for retro-compatibility
while merging task 1827950 in 11.0 (stable)
Task #1838048
PR #24425
|
|
|
|
The portal view for tasks previously listed all task of all projects
without grouping them. It was a problem, mainly when we want to make
the distinction on project label_tasks, to make the difference
between tasks, issues, ... Grouping task by project by default allows
to show the label_tasks before each project.
Grouping the tasks removes the possibility to define a primary
ordering. We want to be able to ungroup the tasks in some cases.
The implentation was done in the portalsearch bar adding
a group by option. The portal proposes two grouping options,
project (by default) and none (to keep strict ordering).
Task: #1827950
PR #23769
|
|
|
|
Odoo 11 comes with unified features for Project Tasks and Project
Issues. Specifically, issues were retro-fitted into tasks, and saw their
specific features added to the features of tasks.
During this refactoring, the portal controller for issues was superseded
by a unified portal controller for tasks, via
623ea432681a8a0861fec6db0194f3911429efb2
One case was lost in the process: portal visibility of
tasks/issues/things that are individually followed by customers, without
the customer following the project itself.
This is important for `transversal` projects, such as a "Helpdesk"
project common to all customers, where each customer only sees their own
issues.
This commit restores the feature, previously added to issues by
1cc8252a953ba6adeeb5dead2c82b336cd51c9db
Note: this clearly requires a proper regression test, to be added soon.
|
|
Displaying the rating of project is moved directly
in project module, since it does not depends on website.
User may want to display rating of its support project
even without website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Making project depending on portal, makes website_project
useless. So move all feature from one module to the other.
|
