| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
invoiceNumber is limited to 20 characters so if the reference in Odoo
is longer we send an incomplete reference. This makes it hard to match
up S2S payment.transactions in Odoo with their counterparts in the
Authorize.net portal.
To solve this send the full reference in the description field (which
has a max length of 255 characters [1]).
[1] https://developer.authorize.net/api/reference/index.html#payment-transactions-charge-a-customer-profile
closes odoo/odoo#64119
Signed-off-by: jorenvo <jorenvo@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
This commit fixes all issues detected by the new pylint
gettext-variable test.
It converts some calls to the new syntax
_("Foo %s", bar)
to progressively migrate the code to the new syntax.
A few calls were not technically incorrect but still detected by the
linter.
_("Foo" +
"Bar")
has been converted to
_("Foo"
"Bar")
as it has the same effect and make sure the argument is of type
asteroid.Const instead of BinOp).
closes odoo/odoo#53683
Related: odoo/enterprise#11467
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
|
|
Set the transaction to the state 'error' when Authorize.net responds
with that status, as it will display a message to the customer to detail
the problem.
opw-2231276
X-original-commit: 005607fce4a22394a9f67cc4eaa52f8bf89780f0
|
|
It is possible to define required fields from the Authorize.net backend
without which no customer profile can be created. These fields include
data that Odoo sometimes does not have at all (fax number, anyone?);
however including the phone number is a meaningful option.
Before this commit, if the 'phone number' was required by the
Authorize.net configuration and was correctly set in Odoo, this still
did not work because we did not include the phone number with the
customer profile creation request payload.
We do now.
opw-2215332
closes odoo/odoo#48420
X-original-commit: 034c04efa4ccecd40f657eae97ef2b04934d570c
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
|
|
- Select 'capture manually' in Authorize.net Payment acquirer
- Do an online transaction
- Click on the Capture button at Payment transaction windows.
An error message is returned:
The element 'transactionRequest' in namespace
'AnetApi/xml/v1/schema/AnetApiSchema.xsd' has invalid child element
'amount' in namespace 'AnetApi/xml/v1/schema/AnetApiSchema.xsd'. List
of possible elements expected: 'splitTenderId, order, lineItems...'.
This because the keys `amount` and `refTransId` are inverted in
`createTransactionRequest`:
https://developer.authorize.net/api/reference/index.html#payment-transactions-capture-a-previously-authorized-amount
A simple fix is to swtich them. Indeed, the Odoo 13.0 requirements is
Python 3.6+, in which the keys order at iteration is the insertion
order. Although this was officially part of the specification in 3.7,
the change is already available in 3.6.
Closes #45891
opw-2201667
closes odoo/odoo#46206
X-original-commit: ae3885295795f8c150bd40af266004016fd300c5
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
|
|
Makes debugging possible without having to run the db locally and
manually adding _loggers everywhere.
Parts of the error are logged already, leading to messages like:
...payment_authorize.models.payment: The transaction was unsuccessful
Unfortunately they don't show the reason. The entire response is
something like:
{'messages': {'message': [{'code': 'E00027',
'text': 'The transaction was unsuccessful.'}],
'resultCode': 'Error'},
'transactionResponse': {'SupplementalDataQualificationIndicator': 0,
'accountNumber': '',
'accountType': '',
'authCode': '',
'avsResultCode': 'P',
'cavvResultCode': '',
'cvvResultCode': '',
'errors': [{'errorCode': '5',
'errorText': 'A valid amount is '
'required.'}],
'refTransID': '',
'responseCode': '3',
'testRequest': '0',
'transHash': '',
'transHashSha2': '',
'transId': '0'}}
Since we log the full request above, let's also log the full response.
PS. this was present before but was lost with 26f3d8465d3c6f1da80c186.
opw-2188889
closes odoo/odoo#45259
X-original-commit: d269bba3b9f4f4fa567a2a7084396bdf08422fa4
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
|
|
Replace website_published and environment by a generic state on
payment.acquirer
Payment acquirers aren't enabled by default. When setting their state to 'enabled' or 'test', it is verified the required fields for the provider are set.
|
|
add accept js of authorize.net to make s2s flow pci compliance
after clicking on pay now button, one popup display with card inputs
popup is provided by a authorize with all validation facilities
After submitting details, payment flow is
- get the temp token information from authorize
- create a token with that temp token information in odoo
- make a request to authorize for charge
- after successful request, payment will be charged for that card
task- 2025821
|
|
- convert XML format request to JSON
- remove refund method from the request, as there is no use of it,
we will never validate card as authorize.net validate card by itself,
so there is no case for the refund
- verify token while creating it
- make verify validity field invisible in case of authorize
task- 2025821
|
|
https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#truth
By default, an object is considered true unless
its class defines either a __bool__() method that returns False
or a __len__() method that returns zero
Since etree elements are iterator, they define a len function.
However it turns out that customerProfileId has always no children.
So bool(find(x)) is always False; the intended meaning was find(x) is None.
opw 1999427
closes odoo/odoo#34922
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When transaction is approved, if for any reason the `customerProfileId`
is missing from the response, the transaction is aborted.
It should succeed even if we cannot create a customer profile.
opw-1998505
closes odoo/odoo#33501
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
opw-1920083
Before this commit, an error arrived when creating a customer profile
without email.
Now, if the email don't exists we send an empty string to Authorize.
closes odoo/odoo#30075
|
|
When creating a customer profile in Authorize.Net we specify a field
merchantCustomerId that is composed of:
ODOO-{partner-id}-{8-random-characters}
But the limit of this field is of 20 characters:
https://developer.authorize.net/api/reference/index.html#payment-transactions
So if we have 1 million partner, we may have eg. a partner 1000005 that
would result in an ID `ODOO-1000005-af123c5b` that is too long and
results in an error.
With this changeset, the generated ID is truncated to 20 characters so
this should theorically be alright for up to 9.99*10^15 partners (the
postgres limit for an integer is 2.15*10^9 so this should be safe
enough).
opw-1962422
closes #32423
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `createCustomerProfileRequest` requires a first name and a last
name for several payment processors.
Reference:
https://developer.authorize.net/api/reference/#customer-profiles-create-customer-profile
opw-1878218
Co-authored-by: Gert Pellin <gpe@odoo.com>
|
|
`firstName` and `lastName` should be filled in for Australia, but the
implementation is not correct since:
- it assumes that the name is first name + last name, which is not the
case in all countries (e.g. France)
- it doesn't take into account that the name could be a company name
This reverts commit 26974d4e5fe48d34294434ed52dcf8053416410e.
|
|
for the payment processor wespac there are required fields we do not send.
required:
•Card Number
•Expiration Date
•Amount
•First Name
•Last Name
•Address
•City
•State/Province**
•Zip Code (Postal Code/Postcode)**
•Country
•Email
** These fields are optional if the billing address is not in the U.S. or Canada. If the address is in the U.S. or Canada, the two-digit State/Province code must be provided, along with the Zip/Postal Code.
|
|
It was very confusing for the user to distinct account.payment and payment.transaction. From now on, the transactions are
technical objects and, in the backend, we only refer to it in log messages (Front end will be adapted in the same fashion
later on). They are hidden in debug mode in accounting\configuration\payments as their purpose is now purely technical/log
This commit also aims to reduce the gap between the accounting app and the transactions: account.payment objects are
created/validated upon completion of transaction.
To ease the capture/voiding of pending transactions, the related buttons are now displayed directly on the SO/invoice
instead of the transactions.
Was task: https://www.odoo.com/web#id=35857&view_type=form&model=project.task&action=333&active_id=967&menu_id=4720
Was PR #24043
[FIX] add domain based on journal to payment tokens
Was opw: https://www.odoo.com/web?debug#id=1828206&view_type=form&model=project.task&menu_id=5200
|
|
|
|
The ZIP code is an optional field, therefore we should not block the
user.
|
|
The ZIP code is an optional field. When saving a payment method, this
generates a traceback since `partner.zip` is `False` while the field
expects a `string`.
opw-1829829
|
|
|
|
complete profil on authorize.net payment.
If the user has no Zip code, country or city, authorize refuse the payment, but Odoo doens't show any error.
The commit invite the user to log in in this case or to fill his missing information
|
|
|
|
Previous to this commit, if a user hadn't properly set up his
Authorize.net credentials, when getting a response from Authorize.net's
servers, we would expect some attributes to be in the response's body,
but this is not the case if the credentials are wrong, thus we would
have an unexpected error like "NoneType object has no attribute text"
which is only a sympton of the real error (bad credentials and no
error-checking).
This is fixed by checking if the response body contains an error
message, if it is the case we raise an UserError with the error code and
the error message (which is only shown if debug mode is activated).
OPW 788261
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Logging data sent & received to/from payment acquirers to be able to track failed payments.
|
|
|
|
It seems that Authorize.net returns an 'Error' status when transactions
fail (note that it can also return an Ok status for different types of
failures).
This is incoherent with the way the authorize requests are processed,
since an Error resultCode will raise a ValidationError, rollbacking the
complete cursor transaction. This makes little sense, since there should
be a trace of the payment.transaction in the backend (preferably with an
explanation for the failure).
This fix adds an error processing step to the response handling of
authorize.net - while before, it was assumed that an 'error' result
meant an issue in communication/setup, now it is treated as an error
in payment and the payment.transaction status is set accordingly.
I've added a test for this and it was green (pinky promise), but this
particular test suite is deactivated (or perhaps only on nightly, I need
to check the nightly process with @nim-odoo).
|
|
This reverts commit fb093726d78b07a322d56b4848a361de93536b1f.
In my hurry, I forgot part of this debug feature, which made it crash
because I tried to stringify a element instead of a tree
|
|
If not [FIX], then [HELP TO FIX] at least
|
|
* remove references to basestring & unicode (use relevant pycompat
helpers)
* remove some str calls (either entirely or replaced by relevant
helper, either text or native)
* use better API to avoid unnecessary conversions
* remove some XML declarations in views
|
|
* StringIO removed from stdlib, replace with io
* try to correctly handle BytesIO/StringIO (one is for bytes the other
is for text)
* fix base64: Python 3 removed bytes-encoding and bytes-bytes
codecs (via #encode) so replace all calls to str.encode('base64'),
also b64encode is a bytes->bytes conversion so attempt to properly
handle that
issue #8530
|
|
- When registering a payment token, validating it using a payment of a small amount (~1.50€) followed by a refund allows ensuring
that the payment method is valid (i.e. checksumming the card number simple ensure the number is valid but not that the card exists).
This commit introduces a generic approach that must be implemented for each acquirer that has tokenization support.
This commit also introduces a generic payment token registration/usage template that can be adapted according to one's need.
- Introducing a new payment form that handles payment, deletion and adding payment method (only for server2server for the moment).
- On /my/payment_method, changed strings 'Payment Acquirers' to 'Payment Methods' which is more clear.
- Stripe can now be used to pay subscriptions.
|
|
|
|
partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #17257
|
|
``import odoo.addons.foo as bar`` doesn't seem to properly trigger the
import hook in Python 3 (it blows up on decimal_precision and
base). Thus convert *all* examples of that pattern to the more
sensible ``from odoo.addons import foo as bar``.
|
|
In Python 3, all of these were "consolidated" under urllib(.request,
.parse, .errors) which is inconvenient.
Since we already have hard dependencies on requests and
werkzeug(.urls, which is a backport of Python 3's unicode-aware
urllib.parse) migrate *everything* to that.
A sticking point is urllib2.URLError, those were (mostly) replaced by
the slightly more general IOError which URLError extends.
|
