| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When creating a customer profile in Authorize.Net we specify a field
merchantCustomerId that is composed of:
ODOO-{partner-id}-{8-random-characters}
But the limit of this field is of 20 characters:
https://developer.authorize.net/api/reference/index.html#payment-transactions
So if we have 1 million partner, we may have eg. a partner 1000005 that
would result in an ID `ODOO-1000005-af123c5b` that is too long and
results in an error.
With this changeset, the generated ID is truncated to 20 characters so
this should theorically be alright for up to 9.99*10^15 partners (the
postgres limit for an integer is 2.15*10^9 so this should be safe
enough).
opw-1962422
closes #32423
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
opw-1920083
Before this commit, an error arrived when creating a customer profile
without email.
Now, if the email don't exists we send an empty string to Authorize.
closes odoo/odoo#30075
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `createCustomerProfileRequest` requires a first name and a last
name for several payment processors.
Reference:
https://developer.authorize.net/api/reference/#customer-profiles-create-customer-profile
opw-1878218
Co-authored-by: Gert Pellin <gpe@odoo.com>
|
|
`firstName` and `lastName` should be filled in for Australia, but the
implementation is not correct since:
- it assumes that the name is first name + last name, which is not the
case in all countries (e.g. France)
- it doesn't take into account that the name could be a company name
This reverts commit 26974d4e5fe48d34294434ed52dcf8053416410e.
|
|
for the payment processor wespac there are required fields we do not send.
required:
•Card Number
•Expiration Date
•Amount
•First Name
•Last Name
•Address
•City
•State/Province**
•Zip Code (Postal Code/Postcode)**
•Country
•Email
** These fields are optional if the billing address is not in the U.S. or Canada. If the address is in the U.S. or Canada, the two-digit State/Province code must be provided, along with the Zip/Postal Code.
|
|
It was very confusing for the user to distinct account.payment and payment.transaction. From now on, the transactions are
technical objects and, in the backend, we only refer to it in log messages (Front end will be adapted in the same fashion
later on). They are hidden in debug mode in accounting\configuration\payments as their purpose is now purely technical/log
This commit also aims to reduce the gap between the accounting app and the transactions: account.payment objects are
created/validated upon completion of transaction.
To ease the capture/voiding of pending transactions, the related buttons are now displayed directly on the SO/invoice
instead of the transactions.
Was task: https://www.odoo.com/web#id=35857&view_type=form&model=project.task&action=333&active_id=967&menu_id=4720
Was PR #24043
[FIX] add domain based on journal to payment tokens
Was opw: https://www.odoo.com/web?debug#id=1828206&view_type=form&model=project.task&menu_id=5200
|
|
|
|
The ZIP code is an optional field, therefore we should not block the
user.
|
|
|
|
complete profil on authorize.net payment.
If the user has no Zip code, country or city, authorize refuse the payment, but Odoo doens't show any error.
The commit invite the user to log in in this case or to fill his missing information
|
|
|
|
Previous to this commit, if a user hadn't properly set up his
Authorize.net credentials, when getting a response from Authorize.net's
servers, we would expect some attributes to be in the response's body,
but this is not the case if the credentials are wrong, thus we would
have an unexpected error like "NoneType object has no attribute text"
which is only a sympton of the real error (bad credentials and no
error-checking).
This is fixed by checking if the response body contains an error
message, if it is the case we raise an UserError with the error code and
the error message (which is only shown if debug mode is activated).
OPW 788261
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Logging data sent & received to/from payment acquirers to be able to track failed payments.
|
|
|
|
It seems that Authorize.net returns an 'Error' status when transactions
fail (note that it can also return an Ok status for different types of
failures).
This is incoherent with the way the authorize requests are processed,
since an Error resultCode will raise a ValidationError, rollbacking the
complete cursor transaction. This makes little sense, since there should
be a trace of the payment.transaction in the backend (preferably with an
explanation for the failure).
This fix adds an error processing step to the response handling of
authorize.net - while before, it was assumed that an 'error' result
meant an issue in communication/setup, now it is treated as an error
in payment and the payment.transaction status is set accordingly.
I've added a test for this and it was green (pinky promise), but this
particular test suite is deactivated (or perhaps only on nightly, I need
to check the nightly process with @nim-odoo).
|
|
This reverts commit fb093726d78b07a322d56b4848a361de93536b1f.
In my hurry, I forgot part of this debug feature, which made it crash
because I tried to stringify a element instead of a tree
|
|
If not [FIX], then [HELP TO FIX] at least
|
|
* remove references to basestring & unicode (use relevant pycompat
helpers)
* remove some str calls (either entirely or replaced by relevant
helper, either text or native)
* use better API to avoid unnecessary conversions
* remove some XML declarations in views
|
|
* StringIO removed from stdlib, replace with io
* try to correctly handle BytesIO/StringIO (one is for bytes the other
is for text)
* fix base64: Python 3 removed bytes-encoding and bytes-bytes
codecs (via #encode) so replace all calls to str.encode('base64'),
also b64encode is a bytes->bytes conversion so attempt to properly
handle that
issue #8530
|
|
- When registering a payment token, validating it using a payment of a small amount (~1.50€) followed by a refund allows ensuring
that the payment method is valid (i.e. checksumming the card number simple ensure the number is valid but not that the card exists).
This commit introduces a generic approach that must be implemented for each acquirer that has tokenization support.
This commit also introduces a generic payment token registration/usage template that can be adapted according to one's need.
- Introducing a new payment form that handles payment, deletion and adding payment method (only for server2server for the moment).
- On /my/payment_method, changed strings 'Payment Acquirers' to 'Payment Methods' which is more clear.
- Stripe can now be used to pay subscriptions.
|
|
|
|
partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #17257
|
|
``import odoo.addons.foo as bar`` doesn't seem to properly trigger the
import hook in Python 3 (it blows up on decimal_precision and
base). Thus convert *all* examples of that pattern to the more
sensible ``from odoo.addons import foo as bar``.
|
|
In Python 3, all of these were "consolidated" under urllib(.request,
.parse, .errors) which is inconvenient.
Since we already have hard dependencies on requests and
werkzeug(.urls, which is a backport of Python 3's unicode-aware
urllib.parse) migrate *everything* to that.
A sticking point is urllib2.URLError, those were (mostly) replaced by
the slightly more general IOError which URLError extends.
|
|
In Python 3:
* various builtins and dict methods were changed to return
view/iterable objects rather than lists
* and the separate Python 2 view/iterable builtins and methods were
removed altogether
This is problematic when using these items as list (which the happens
repeatedly in Odoo), but more viciously when iterating *multiple times*
over them (which also happens, which I've messed up multiple times while
writing this, and which is a pain to debug even when you've just created
the issue).
Convert all code using these to semantics-matching cross-version
helper functions to get the LCD behaviour between P2 and P3, and
forbid the builtins via lint.
issue #8530
|
|
When no email is defiend on the partner, a traceback is raised when
paying with Authorize.net.
The `text` attribute requires a string, not a boolean (`False` in this
case).
opw-728301
|
|
This commit improves the tokenization process, allowing users
to set the acquirer to save payment data never, always or letting
the customer decide (only implemented in ecommerce for now).
Support for tokenization is improved for Ogone and Authorize.net
This commits also factorizes advanced payment features support
(authorization, tokenization, fees computation) in a generic method
overriden by every provider to specifiy which features are supported.
This process can be used in views to hide/show fields depending on
feature support or in constraint checks.
|
|
This commit add s2s communication to the Authorize.net payment
provider, allowing the user to:
- Create a payment token
- Charge a payment token
- Authorize/capture transactions
|
