| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
*: account_payment, payment, sale
Steps:
- Install eCommerce
- Go to Website / Configuration / eCommerce / Payment Acquirers
- Configure Stripe:
- Save Cards: Always
- Payment Flow: Redirection to the acquirer website
- Go to /shop
- Add a product to the cart
- Process Checkout
- Select Stripe
- Pay Now
- Enter test data in Stripe Checkout form (https://stripe.com/docs/testing#cards)
- Pay
- Go to /shop
- Add a product to the cart
- Process Checkout
- Select your saved card
- Pay Now
Bug:
Stripe Error:
The provided PaymentMethod was previously used with a PaymentIntent
without Customer attachment, shared with a connected account without
Customer attachment, or was detached from a Customer. It may not be used
again. To use a PaymentMethod multiple times, you must attach it to a
Customer first.
Explanation:
https://stripe.com/docs/api/checkout/sessions/create#create_checkout_session-payment_intent_data-setup_future_usage
> Indicates that you intend to make future payments with the payment
> method collected by this Checkout Session.
According to this doc, `setup_future_usage` must be set in order to use
the saved card afterwards.
opw:2452452
opw:2498571
opw:2509897
closes odoo/odoo#69772
X-original-commit: 43e666f21f488067cf09a994fba7782271446b84
Signed-off-by: backspac <backspac@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
Steps:
- Install account,payment
- Go to Invoicing
- Create an invoice
- Click Actions > Generate a Payment Link
- Follow the generated link
- Pay
Bug:
The transaction is not linked to the sale order in the link table
`account_invoice_transaction_rel`
Explanation:
This fix is broadly mimicking the behavior of the sales module regarding
the link of an order to a transaction, adding `invoice_id`s where they
are needed throughout the payment process in order to link the
transaction to the invoice.
opw:2451534
closes odoo/odoo#67289
X-original-commit: 7c6d06fa5858f79f3b22cdeaf74cdc26a642742f
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: backspac <backspac@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
Steps:
- Install sales,payment
- Go to Sales
- Create a quotation
- Click Actions > Generate a Payment Link
- Browse the link in a private window
- Pay
Bug:
The transaction is not linked to the sale order in the link table
`sale_order_transaction_rel`
Explanation:
When not connected, the user doesn't have the rights to read the order.
This leads `order_id` to be set to `None`:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d2f3c9e7975188753fa17c06db3fc5c73c773944/addons/payment/controllers/portal.py#L177-L178
When paying without `order_id`, the app is not able to make a link
with the transactions:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d2f3c9e7975188753fa17c06db3fc5c73c773944/addons/payment/controllers/portal.py#L276-L277
This raises problems such as not being able to capture an amount as seen
here:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d2f3c9e7975188753fa17c06db3fc5c73c773944/addons/sale/views/sale_views.xml#L254-L257
If we ensure a `partner_id` is present, using `sudo` here shouldn't be a
problem as the data is protected by the token. Everything we get from
`order_id` should already be in the URL.
opw:2451564
closes odoo/odoo#66616
X-original-commit: f1f73fd2f8efdbac18d33d4e0b866ca50a28d537
Signed-off-by: backspac <backspac@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
- The PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/55122 introduced a typo,
that breaks the payment page.
opw-2322033
closes odoo/odoo#56204
X-original-commit: 125683bbbb7b1f43bec29bdd07e81886c4e6e139
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
|
|
Select a sales order.
Go to action > generate payment link.
Open private browser, reach the link.
User will receive error message because of access denied to the
res.partner data.
opw-2287534
closes odoo/odoo#54808
X-original-commit: 3b4f3a8ad2880721cf6de9fb08387412df85d356
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
|
|
- Install 3 payment providers:
P1: no countries set
P2: country set to USA
P3: country set to Canada
- Activate online payment of invoices
- Create an invoice for portal user A (country of user is USA)
- Login with A
- Pay the invoice
All 3 providers are available, while only 1 & 2 should be available.
The providers are filtered in the sale module, but not in the account
module:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/586ee04a6296c13868011b3afaca61be5c6ff3c6/addons/sale/controllers/portal.py#L190-L193
The same issue occurs with the direct link `/website_payment/pay`.
We apply the same filtering in all modules.
opw-2279710
closes odoo/odoo#53483
X-original-commit: aaac93b551e2a5f331dd14ee5aefbe4ced173691
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
|
|
When generating a payment link through the payment link wizard, the
company was previously not included. This could cause accounting issues
if the acquirer displayed to the customer were not part of the same
company as the underlying document that generated the link.
This commit add a new computed field 'company_id' on the wizard model
that gets computed based on the underlying model; this field will be
included in links generated by the wizard to limit the acquirers
displayed to those of the that company, preventing extra acocunting
steps (interco reconciliation).
opw-2254011
closes odoo/odoo#51441
X-original-commit: a6fcd7e0cfec8d4c62620a53b5fa806561e239af
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
|
|
Steps to reproduce:
- install sales, ecommerce and payment_authorize
- setup authorize.net (test mode)
- go to sales and select the quotation S00007 (demo data) or create a quotation
with multiple items that add up to a float
- select action > generate a payment link > go to the link > select pay with authorize
- you are redirected to authorize.net use 4111 1111 1111 1111 as card number and 1223
as expiration date > pay
- you are redirected to the odoo payment process page
- wait for the result
Previous behavior:
the user is returned to a 404 error page but the payment went trough
Current behavior:
access_token generation is consistent and will not fail because of
float representation
the user is returned to the "payment confirmed" page
WARNINGS:
- watching the values in vscode prevents bug reproduction
- when setting up authorize.net, do not forget to add your test url to
the account's allowed return urls
- use https for authorize.net connection
opw-2223135
closes odoo/odoo#50633
X-original-commit: 0fe7fa0f95b7393d8829ba4b216d6c41d0c0dc3d
Signed-off-by: mightyjol <jhk-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
opw-2231276
X-original-commit: 7b62c95d44c0abce9b53b476bb1e65fc873da24d
|
|
- The payment link generated by using the wizard
`payment.link.wizard` are overriden to generate
URL linked to sale orders.
If so, we want the payment acquirer displayed to
be in the same company as the sale order.
closes odoo/odoo#49018
X-original-commit: 8c299efb6cb4355cec39cdedd8d7c3134f53d199
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
|
|
The access right on payment_token is based on the partner_id
linked with the user
If there is token link with the public user,
they are shown for every request were the partner_id is not defined
If you are logged with an internal user with sales access right,
you'll see all the payment_token linked with the acquirer
We should avoid both situation and show only the payment_token
from the legit partner_id
the one of the current user or the one given as parameter
closes odoo/odoo#44346
X-original-commit: 9edad5d9018ae357e955a5e21e9366e56caa8e31
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Damien Bouvy <dbo@odoo.com>
|
|
Fix error like "TypeError: {4} is not JSON serializable" when
serializing the session object (e.g. for external storage)
closes odoo/odoo#41360
X-original-commit: e91e38fa4bd12ba9d2027e7778a10252e08b9a86
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#37127
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
- allow acquirers to arbitrarily include info about the tx in the
processing page
- pending is now a valid state that could require customer action in the
payment processing page - don't blindly redirect to the return url of
another tx if a pending transaction is there
This latest change might mean that customers with many tx attempts might
have a sub-par experience as they may need to click manually on the
redirect url of a successful tx while before they were redirected
immediately.
|
|
When generating a link for a payment through the website_payment/pay
route, including the partner_id 'blindly' is somewhat of a security
issue since it means you could potentially create payments for any
partner of your choosing.
This commit instead introduces an access token mechanism where the
partner_id, amount and currency_id are used to generate a unique access
token that can be checked upon accessing the payment page. This token
is only checked if the partner_id field is set (otherwise this is just
an anonymous payment like any other).
|
|
|
|
Currently when payment is processed through the payment link by
public user then there is no details of partner(email, country etc..)
so due to that some payment provider(paypal, stripe etc.) produce
the traceback on public payment
so when generating link for the payment pass the partner on link so
where payment is processed by public user then it will get the customer
of the record as partner, so on behalf of the customer the payment is
processed.
task-1938635
Closes: #31575
|
|
let the landing page handle the message to display instead of
intercepting the state in the controller.
|
|
|
|
Co-Authored-By: William Andre <wan@odoo.com>
|
|
Replace website_published and environment by a generic state on
payment.acquirer
Payment acquirers aren't enabled by default. When setting their state to 'enabled' or 'test', it is verified the required fields for the provider are set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#34872
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#34868
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
|
|
- treat s2s transactions as such
- don't filter out tokens saved on acquirers that are not set for full
s2s mode, as tokens might get created through a form and still be usable
- detect the submit event as well as the click on the 'Pay Now' button
to avoid completely wrecking the payment flow by pressing the return key
- correct start override in JS should chain promises
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#33360
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
|
|
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closes odoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
|
|
- When validating payments on the payment process polling page
errors can occurs and the tracebacks aren't logged which doesn't help
when trying to understand the issues.
With this commit we display the traceback instead of shadowing them.
closes odoo/odoo#33537
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
|
|
- When processing payments on the payments processing page,
`psycopg2.OperationalError` can be raised.
We do not want those exceptions to be displayed to the customers,
instead we want the polling page to try to process the payments again.
This commit hides the display of psycopg2 operational errors.
- This commit also fixes the "processing your payments" message being
hidden after the first polling, no matter if the processing has succeeded or not.
closes odoo/odoo#33462
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
|
|
Sequentially previewing and paying two sale orders was causing a
redirection issue. Instead of being redirect to the SO preview
(/my/orders/<:order_id>), the user was redirected to /payment/process.
The issue was due to processed transactions not being removed from the
session.
opw-1948288
Closes #31741
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
|
|
- Activate multi-company
- Create 2 S2S payment methods (Payment Flow: Payment from Odoo), one
for each company
- Connect as a regular user to `/my/payment_method`
The user has access to both payment methods, while he should only have
access to the method of his company.
opw-1920483
closes odoo/odoo#30558
|
|
|
|
The user should always be redirected when paying with wire transfer.
This is because the landing page displays useful data such as the communication.
Closes #27194
|
|
Sips does not accept special characters as a transaction reference.
Replacing '-' solve this issue.
Parsing Sips response was failing when the return url had query parameters.
This was due to the split on '='. Encoding the url solve this issue.
|
|
This commit aims to improve the user experience when using payment acquirers. There currently are no error feedback with some acquirers, which leaves the user wondering what is going on and what is the real status of its payment.
In some cases, the user is currently being redirected to the home page even though the payment has failed. We want to make it more obvious to the user that something unexpected has happened by redirecting to an intermediate page that will provide good feedback on payments status.
Another goal of this commit is to order acquirers by sequence instead of by flow and to select the first acquirer by default. This feature was already implmented in commit fe294fd43e521bd2d339e962f43acf46c3d4cb97, some UI adaptations were needed though.
Related to task #36680
Closes #26958
|
|
- When creating a transaction on the payment page of the portal, the
transaction reference returned was incorrect.
This commit return the newly created transaction's reference.
|
|
- The method to compute the reference of a payment.transaction and avoid
duplicate was missing some edge cases (for example if there was a '-'
in the reference).
- The creation of transactions in the route /website_payment/pay was not
checking for duplicate payment.transaction.
|
|
|
|
- Having a lang set when trying to create a payment transaction can cause issues due to uninstalled langs on the database.
|
|
It was very confusing for the user to distinct account.payment and payment.transaction. From now on, the transactions are
technical objects and, in the backend, we only refer to it in log messages (Front end will be adapted in the same fashion
later on). They are hidden in debug mode in accounting\configuration\payments as their purpose is now purely technical/log
This commit also aims to reduce the gap between the accounting app and the transactions: account.payment objects are
created/validated upon completion of transaction.
To ease the capture/voiding of pending transactions, the related buttons are now displayed directly on the SO/invoice
instead of the transactions.
Was task: https://www.odoo.com/web#id=35857&view_type=form&model=project.task&action=333&active_id=967&menu_id=4720
Was PR #24043
[FIX] add domain based on journal to payment tokens
Was opw: https://www.odoo.com/web?debug#id=1828206&view_type=form&model=project.task&menu_id=5200
|
|
- Fix an issue where the transaction were always set a 'form_save' thus always creating payment tokens.
- Fix an issue where when the customer paying while not being logged in was crashing.
The issue is due to the fact that we are creating payment transactions linked to no partners, doing so it crashing the code when creating the payment token with no partner set.
|
|
- Portal payement is not respecting the option to save tokens after payments.
|
|
- On 'website_payment/pay' if the reference contains a '/' the payment will never succeed.
It is due to the fact that in the template "payment.pay" were setting "prepare_tx_url" and "form_action" using this reference.
But having a '/' in the reference breaks the URL to call to create a transaction.
So when creating a transaction (or even paying in S2S) the payment never succeed and returns a HTTP 404 error.
|
|
The generic payment form introduced in 11.0 has changed the way we collect payment and so does the code.
The route /website_payment/pay hasn't been changed to support the new payment form.
This commit fixes this.
It also fixes a bug for when a customer tries to create two transactions with the same reference.
|
|
The `website_payment` route has not been implmented following the
payment refactoring. Deactive it for now.
opw-787897
|
|
|
