| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Part of task 1896658
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Christophe Matthieu <chm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: David Monjoie <dmo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: svs-odoo <svs@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt <vsc@odoo.com>
|
|
If user has blocked odoo push notifications
then there's no way to enable via the OdooBot notification in the systray as it depends on the navigator
so display the alert message under users preference section.
Related Task ID: 1929547
closes odoo/odoo#30496
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#30045
|
|
Before this commit, the notification "Odoobot has a request" would
stay on screen even though the user blocked them in Firefox.
This case occurred when the user clicks on "Not Now", which tells the
browser that the push notifications should be blocked until the next
page reload.
This commit fixes this issue, so that the notification is removed
when clicking on "Not Now", in addition to cleaning tests related
to push notifications.
Task-ID 1918476
closes odoo/odoo#29584
|
|
With this commit, no push notification is sent to user when
to acknowledge that he just has accepted them. Also, on native
push notifications, the Odoo Bot icon now has a transparent
background.
Task-ID 1881001
|
|
This rev. introduces robust helpers to use in the JS tests suite to
interact with DOM and components, and starts using them (almost)
everywhere.
All the helpers are exposed though testUtils.js.
There are 2 kinds of helpers:
1. Assertions
-------------
* assert.containsNone, containsN, containsOnce check that the DOM
(or a specific part of the DOM) contains a `selector`. It
generates a correct error message automatically.
ex: assert.strictEqual(form.$('.o_form_editable'), 1, "msg");
-> assert.containsOnce(form, '.o_form_editable');
* assert.isVisible, isNotVisible check that the DOM has an element
visible or not. They also check that the element is actually in
the DOM (before most tests didn't verify this).
* assert.hasClass, doesNotHaveClass, hasAttrVAlue, check specific
properties of a DOM element, and also validate that it is
applied on a single existing DOM element (before most tests
didn't verify this).
ex: assert.notOk(form.$('button').hasClass('btn-primary'));
-> assert.doesNotHaveClass(form.$('button'), 'btn-primary');
2. Utilities
------------
The goal of the utilities is to centralize the definition of many
standard components and interactions, ensuring that when we
refactor the JS framework, we do not need to change all the tests.
Existing mock utilities (addMockEnvironment, intercept, path,
patchDate, unpatch and fieldsViewGet) are moved to
'testUtils.mock.*'.
Existing DOM utilities are moved to 'testUtils.dom.*'.
New dom utilities are created for opendDatePicker, click,
clickFirst and clickLast. Helper `click` verifies that there is
exactly 1 element visible in the DOM you click on, `clickFirst`
and `clickLast` verify that there are more than one element on the
DOM.
ex: form.$('button').click();
-> testUtils.dom.click(form.$('button'));
New Form utilities: (testUtils.form.*)
clickEdit, clickSave, clickCreate, clickDiscard, all clicks on
the control panel buttons of the form.
`reload` reloads the form data.
New modal, graph, kanban and pivot utils (testUtils.pivot.*,
testUtils.kanban.*, etc.).
New fields utils: (testUtils.fields.*)
* editInput, editSelect: allow to change the value of a field,
using a selector to identify it. They validate that the input
exists and trigger the change event automatically.
* editAndTrigger: allow to modify a field and trigger specific
events after the value change
* many2one (testUtils.fields.many2one.*)
clickOpenDropdown, clickHighlightedItem, clickItem,
searchAndClickItem: use a field name instead of a selector and
do all the complex mechanism to open, filter and highlight
many2one fields.
Joint work with aab, dam, ged, mge, svs and vsc.
|
|
This commit makes small improvements on the messaging menu with
the new module `mail_bot`:
[IMP] When OdooBot has a request, it now adds "+1" to the counter of
the messaging menu. The related preview also has a bold title,
and displays "(1)" next to the title.
[REF] Static previews are no longer in mail_service. This was only
used for "OdooBot has a request" preview. This logic has now
been moved to the module `mail_bot` (was previously in `mail`).
[FIX] Title of response of push notifications permission clearly
states whether permission has been granted or denied
(was displaying "[Object object]" before this commit).
Task-ID 1877502
|
|
1. Odoobot shouldn't talk to admin when demo data are installed
Odoobot will talk to a user on it's first connection, meaning that
a dev will see this chat window a lot. The state disabled is not a
real state but is explicit, the odoobot wont be initialized in this
case. It is still possible to test odoobot flow with demo user.
2. remove old odoobot image and update link
3. small improvements in odoobot answers
|
|
Purpose of this commit is to improve onboarding with a wow effect and a bot
to test the Discuss app. Otherwise new users have nobody to talk to. Retention
will be improved by both increasing interactions and onboarding of Discuss
features.
This commit adds a simple bot in discuss. It answers some questions, helps
users getting their hand on discuss and eases the onboarding.
In this version, the flow is quite simple, and only im_livechat adds some
logic in order to show canned response. The logic is contained in new
modules: mail_bot and im_livechat_mail_bot in order to keep everything
well separated. It also allows users to remove the mailbot if they do not
want to keep this functionality.
Odoobot will only answer if he is in the onboarding conversation (alone
with a user in a channel of type chat) or if a user pings odoobot.
Odoobot logic applies to both standard chatter / channel messages and
also transient messages (like help commands).
Specifications
* 2 minutes after first sign in, users will receive a direct chat from
Odoobot;
* make Odoobot an archived partner;
* scenario
* Odoobot: "Hello, I'm here to help you discover chat features. Try
answering me with an emoji :)";
* User: Send emoji
* Odoobot: "Great! :) Did you notice that you can also send attachments,
like a picture of your cute dog? Try it!"
* Odoobot: "Not a cute dog, but you get it :) To access special features,
start your sentence with "/" (I.E. /help)""
* User: /help
* Auto message then Odoobot: "Wow you're a natural! As a channel usually
contain a lot of users, you can grab the attention with a ping. Try to
ping me with @Odoobot!"
* User: @Odoobot lorem ipsum
* if Livechat installed
* add 2 demo canned response so it does not look weird (like "Hello, how
may I help you?" and "Have a nice day!")
* Odoobot: "Perfect! <br> Try to type ":" to use canned responses."
* User tries canned
* Odoobot: "Good, you can customize your canned responses in the live chat
application. <br><br> + réponse suivante"
* Odoobot: "There's 3 different ways in Odoo to interact with your
colleagues: via this chat window, [img of chat window] via the Discuss
application [img of Discuss app + icon on it] or via the chatter [img of
the chatter]. Aaaaand that's it! Enjoy discovering Odoo! :)"
* random answers to ping/bad answer
* "Mmmmh I'm not sure what you mean.. Can you try again?"
* "I'm afraid I don't understand. Sorry!"
* when someone pings @OdooBot with no reason: Odoobot: Yaaaay that's me!
[party emoji]
* fun stuff to add for some answer
* User: i love you / love
* Odoobot: Aaaaaw that's really cute but, you know, bots don't work
that way. You're too human for me! Let's keep it professional <3
* User: Fuck
* Odoobot: That's not a really nice thing to say, you know? I'm a bot but I
have feelings, ok?! </3
This commit is linked to task ID 1838588 and PR #25075.
|
