| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When using the "Send & Print" functionality, if the user adds an
attachment, the latter won't be linked to the record.
To reproduce the error:
1. Open a posted invoice
2. Send & Print
3. Attach a file > Select a file on your device
4. Send the email
Error: The invoice's PDF is added to record's attachments, but not the
other file (from step 3).
When the module selects the attachments that need to be linked to the
invoice, it only keeps the ones currently linked to `mail.compose.message`:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6441ab71cb68648aa735057952bf757677a20ee3/addons/mail/models/mail_thread.py#L1719-L1725
This is correct when the user creates a message directly in the chatter.
However, when the mail is created thanks to `Send & Print` functionality,
the attachment is linked to `account.invoice.send`.
Another flow have a similar issue: from invoices list, select few ones,
Action > Send & Print: the generated PDF won't be attached to their
invoice. In such a situation, here is the source of the problem:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/05ad6c477f7da2a495e5baf5b4629323b9d11fa0/addons/mail/wizard/mail_compose_message.py#L363-L367
There isn't any information about the invoice, therefore it is not
possible to linked the attachment to it.
OPW-2438457
closes odoo/odoo#71425
X-original-commit: e87f599d4eb22250b628d650b9f59b54db8d043c
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
The optimization 2ccf0bd0dc does not take into account that to
"unblacklist" a user, you have the archive the mail.blacklist record so
only mail.blacklist active records need to be taken into account.
Added test without the fix fails with:
AssertionError: False is not true : MailTrace: email
test.record.02@test.example.com (recipient res.partner(), state:
sent, record: mailing.test.blacklist(166,)): found 0 records (1 expected)
opw-2536304
closes odoo/odoo#71239
X-original-commit: 8ffd82249728b79959cfa61490730991a2b339d6
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
|
|
Before this commit:
When someone sends mail with help of mail_composer(mail.compose.message)
without having a mail template set, mail is not deleted after being sent
(and causes unwanted/unexpected burden on DB). This bug was introduced
with commit[1], where auto deletion was disabled if template is not set
on the composer.
After this commit:
If there is no mail template set on the composer, or if the template is
set and 'auto_delete' is enabled on that template, the mail sent from
composer will be deleted after being sent successfully.
A context key is added to allow controlling this behavior. It is notably use
to check query counters differences.
commit[1] - https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/8a026e26c6ae25e3fdb5369a7fa3343d70fab782#diff-898a3d5c08a567c1a7b82c026a213d796e850e376cbdb1c9e7936409f440d37aR257
Task id: 2484915
PR odoo/odoo#68870
Original Pr #68403
X-original-commit: 05ad6c477f7da2a495e5baf5b4629323b9d11fa0
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
|
|
- Connect with Admin
- Go to Contacts, edit himself by adding a Private Address
- Create an Internal User without "Access to Private Addresses" right (i.e. User X)
- Go to any app implementing chatter (i.e. Sales)
- Create a SO
- Add the created Private Address as follower
- Make sure User X can access the record (i.e. Sales: Administrator)
- Connect with User X and open the SO
An Access Error is raised while trying to fetch data about the followers.
This commit prevents to:
- add a private address as follower of a record
- add a private address as Recipient in full composer
- propose private addresses when adding a mention to a partner
opw-2428936
closes odoo/odoo#65933
Task-id: 2463622
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
|
|
The `{'infos': 'mail_sent'}` property returned by `action_send_mail()`
was apparently unused, and orginally intended for debugging, according
to its author.
Since previous commit adds a warning for such unknown properties,
removing it entirely keeps the testsuite green. And it's cleaner
than explicitly allowing that extra key, since it's unused.
closes odoo/odoo#62581
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
|
|
Courtesy of Transifex's translators for reporting bad/unclear sentences.
closes odoo/odoo#62539
Related: odoo/enterprise#15032
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
|
|
As default is called numerous times with sometimes all fields, sometimes
only one field we have to ensure we avoid computing and setting unnecessary
or wrong values. We suspect this comes from default_get being called more
often at creation time since Odoo v14.
Default values for some fields in mail composer are dependent on each other.
Especially composition mode and model / res_id(s) are important for some
fields as behavior is not the same in comment or mass mail mode (subject
set / not set, template values rendered / displayed raw, ...).
Especially subject is wrongly computed in mass mail mode. For example use a
mass mail composer action on leads without template. Indeed a default_get
is called on subject alone. As web client adds active_model / active_id
automatically default returns a value for subject while it should not as
other values (model, res_id) are not asked and therefore not correctly
computed. It makes composer compute values in comment mode while it should
stay in mass mode.
In this commit we fix that behavior by
* computing only requested values (better match returned values and asked
fields);
* avoid computing values if context values are not given (model, res_id or
res_ids, composition_mode);
Task ID-2390314
PR odoo/odoo#62061
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
|
|
Courtesy of translators
Reexport .pot of modified modules
closes odoo/odoo#61002
Related: odoo/enterprise#14485
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
|
|
due to breaking changes in https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/bf32b22ce247c19fda94ded74e37f7c6120ce2c4
and especially the part:
"NOTE 1. If the default_get within the onchange returns a value for
a field that is not in the view, we ignore it, and it won't be saved.
Before, that value was kept and sent upon save. This change in behavior
may prove problematic, although the overall risk is small. Decision has
been made to keep heavy comments and code snippets if we were to revert
back somehow to the previous situation."
the wizard to sending failures email was broken as the field partner_id
which is required was not present in the view and was thus ignored by
to web client when calling 'create'.
closes odoo/odoo#58299
Task: 2341593
Closes: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/58299
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
|
|
For large lists of blocked emails, the time taken to load the records in
cache becomes prohibitive. For instance on a sample blocklist of 600k
entries, the `search([])` to load them could take 80-90s to run!
And this toll is taken every time the mail composer processes an email
batch in mass-mailing mode. Technically, most of the time is spent
iterating on the list of ids many time, in order to prefetch fields
into cache by determining what's missing.
Loading the contents of the list in raw SQL takes a fraction of that
time (400ms vs 90s).
Subsequently using a set for lookups in that blocklist is also much
faster (average time complexity O(1) vs O(n)).
Example: looking up an item in a 600k-entry blocklist is easily 5
orders of magnitude faster!
```
In [1]: blocklist = set(x[0] for x in self._cr.fetchall())
In [2]: len(blocklist)
Out[2]: 634610
In [3]: self._cr.execute("SELECT email from mail_blacklist")
In [4]: blocklist = set(x[0] for x in self._cr.fetchall())
In [5]: %timeit "hello@hello.com" in blocklist
The slowest run took 35.29 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached.
10000000 loops, best of 3: 31.6 ns per loop
In [6]: self._cr.execute("SELECT email from mail_blacklist")
In [7]: blocklist = [x[0] for x in self._cr.fetchall()]
In [8]: %timeit "hello@hello.com" in blocklist
100 loops, best of 3: 2.24 ms per loop
```
closes odoo/odoo#57128
X-original-commit: 3b9a85754f30f0bef508d0b576ff679c87ead5da
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
|
|
PURPOSE
Since v13 some commits added code in mail thread file. This file is already
quite long and keeping it organized allow to understand its content.
SPECIFICATIONS
Some methods defined on mail.thread may actually be called on models
not inheriting from mail.thread . Instead of having model methods on mail
thread receiving a records parameter it seems better to have those available
directly on BaseModel.
Move static_message_track on BaseModel in models.py. This method is now called
_mail_track, to be coherent with othe rmail-related naming. It is used in
accounting to track values in line model that does not inherit from mail.
thread. Update accounting accordingly (followup of d862965).
Move _message_get_default_recipients_on_records in models.py. Renaming it
_message_get_default_recipients() allow to be compatible with current behavior
and current override available in some addons (like CRM, event, ...).
Move _notify_get_reply_to_on_records in models.py. Renaming it
_notify_get_reply_to() allows to be shorter and coherent.
Move _alias_check_contact_on_record in models.py. Renaming it
_alias_check_contact_() allows to be shorter and coherent. Its override in
hr is also moved on BaseModel.
Backward compatibility is kept for those methods as this PR target a mostly
stable version.
LINKS
Task ID-2327096 (code cleaning)
PR #56631
|
|
Replace wrong usages of any(list|recordset), by any(generator)
to speed up computations, avoiding list creations and/or looping twice on a recordset
for nothing.
any([generator]) => any(generator)
any(filtered) => any(generator)
closes odoo/odoo#55768
Related: odoo/enterprise#12360
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
|
|
Issue
- Login as Mitchell Admin
- In Projects module, Create a new project
- Set Visibility to 'Invited employees'
- Create new task and assign it to Mitchell Admin
- Edit the task and add Marc Demo as follower
- Login as Marc Demo
- Go to the task previously created
- Add an other follower
IrRule Error
Solution
Use sudo() to find all followers of a document.
opw-2303443
closes odoo/odoo#55521
X-original-commit: e0d064ffe4013ed727bdc780a3d0a7c6b16e6e9c
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: bon-odoo <nboulif@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
When more than one parameter is present in a message, it helps the
translation to use named placeholder. This way, the order can be
changed. It also helps the comprehension of the message.
|
|
This commit is a significant rewriting of client-side discuss, chatter,
chat window, and messaging menu using OWL. The behavior should be broadly
the same, with some slight functional changes here and there.
From a technical standpoint, the code of messaging is mainly organized in 2
main groups of modules:
- models, which are logical entities that depict the client-side state of
messaging as a whole.
- components, which are in charge of displaying information from models.
This refactoring also introduces new JS guidelines regarding folder structure
(/static) and naming rules for JS modules.
Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/39023
Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/6249
Task-1914207
This PR is a collaborative work by Alexandre, Julien, Sébastien and Xavier,
with the precious help of Lucas to speed it up towards the end.
closes odoo/odoo#39023
Related: odoo/enterprise#6249
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Giannone <jgi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys <seb@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier Dubuc <xdu@odoo.com>
|
|
The ir.autovacuum model purpose is to run several garbage collecting
operations like removing files from the filestore when no attachment
references them anymore.
The precedent strategy to register new garbage collection tasks was to
override the `power_on` method and to imperatively execute a vacuum
cleaning method on a given model. All calls were executed in a single
SQL transaction without any error handling, meaning a single fail during
any call resulted in a complete failure of the entire vacuum cleaning
chain.
We introduce a new `@autovacuum` api decorator, its purpose it to
register garbage collecting methods that will be safely executed in
their own transaction by the vacuum cleaner. In order to ensure this
new strategy is used, we deprecate `power_on` extensions.
By the way, garbage-collecting methods can be quite heavy and we don't
want users to directly call them. We now ensure they are private.
closes odoo/odoo#47842
Task: 2154079
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Olivier Dony <odo@odoo.com>
|
|
- Configure your outgoing email server to be sure that a failure will be triggered
when trying to send an email
- Make sure you don't have enough sms credit to send a sms
- Go to a contact page
- Send a message to the contact via the chatter
- An notification error should appear in the conversations icon in the systray
- Send a sms to the contact
- An notification error should appear in the conversations icon in the systray
- Click on the "Mark as read" icon on the notification error for the email
- A "Discard mail delivery failures" wizard will appear
- Click on "DISCARD DELIVERY FAILURES"
All email and sms delivery failures are discarded.
Only the email delivery failures should be discarded.
opw-2247617
closes odoo/odoo#51204
X-original-commit: d8c177969239a9bd6dcbd6654a914d40a6ba479f
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
|
|
The purpose is to have more common code for failure and notifications, with less
override in `sms` and `snailmail`.
task-2176017
closes odoo/odoo#44170
Related: odoo/enterprise#9140
Related: odoo/upgrade#918
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
|
|
TL;DR: remember `osv` and `except_orm` ? You can forget about them.
* Deprecated `except_orm` dropped.
* `UserError` elevated as super type of all user-related
errors.
* Unused `DeferredException` dropped.
* Unused `QWebException` dropped (real one is in `qweb.py`).
* `MailDeliveryException` made a python exception.
* `name` legacy exception attribute made an alias of the python standard
`args[0]` attribute and deprecated.
* `value` legacy exception attribute dropped.
* `exception_type` RPC error response key dropped.
* Deprecated `osv` module dropped.
* `--osv-memory-age-limit` cli option made an alias of
`--transient-age-limit` and deprecated.
The `odoo.exceptions.Warning` have long been a deprecated alias to
`UserError`. It is going to be removed in a future version but first we
explicitly deprecate it with a warning.
The `odoo.exceptions.DeferredException` was a very old internal
exception, it has been removed without deprecation notice as it is never
raised.
The `odoo.exceptions.except_orm` has been a deprecated exception type
with deprecation warning for 5 years, it has been removed in favor of
UserError which becomes the super class of all user-related errors.
The `odoo.base.models.ir_mail_server.MailDeliveryException` was
inheriting `except_orm`. As it is not related to a user error but is
more of a problem an admin much take care of, the exception has been
made a Python error.
The `exception_type` JSON key in RPC error responses was holding an
hardcoded value derived from the exception type. Its usage has been
dropped in favor of the `name` JSON key that holds the precise exception
name. Again as it was hardly used in the source code (beside the crash
manager) it has been dropped without deprecation warning.
Since we are here trying to clean odoo custom exceptions, we are also
deprecating the `name` exception attribute in favor of the more standard
`args[0]` attribute.
The `name` (along with `value`) were two attributes used to raise
`except_orm` exceptions before the introduction of `UserError`,
`AccessError` and related exceptions. The `name` attribute, at the time,
was holding the exception type/title. Nowadays it contains the error
message. The `value` attribute, at the time, was holding the error
message. Nowadays it is no more used.
The `osv` module contains very old deprecated aliases. There is no
simple way to log a deprecation warning for osv, osv_memory and
osv_abstract but as they have not been in use for ages, they have been
removed too. To be consistent, the `--osv-memory-age-limit` cli option
has been made a deprecated alias to the `--transient-age-limit`.
closes odoo/odoo#45723
Task: 2187728
Related: odoo/enterprise#9162
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
|
|
Previously a blacklisted phone number or email address could only be
removed from their respective blacklist by going to the corresponding
blacklist view [in mass_mailing_(sms)] and manually
archiving/deactiviting the entry. All users could see that an email was
blacklisted via an fa-ban icon added next to their corresponding field
in the modules: crm, mass_mailing, mass_mailing_sms, and contacts (via
extension).
This commit adds additional fa-ban icons next to blacklisted phone
numbers and makes all instances of these icons clickable to remove them
from their corresponding blacklist using a wizard. There are several
limitations to this implementation including:
1. If both a mobile and phone number field appear within a crm lead
instance, then only the mobile field will indicate if it is blacklisted
(due to current implementation of PhoneMixin which only checks 1 phone
value against the blacklist and "sms" which returns mobile numbers first).
I.e. if a phone field value is blacklisted, but a value is typed into the
mobile field, then the phone field will never indicate that it is blacklisted.
2. If someone clicks on a unblacklisting icon after changing the
corresponding field value without clicking off the field input, then the
latest typed in value will be the one submitted for unblacklisting,
which may not actually be blacklisted (due to "is_blacklisted" flag
being a computed field and it not having a chance to re-compute to hide
the button).
3. If someone changes values in the blacklist, then someone who already
has a form open will not see icon disappear until something triggers a
re-compute of the "phone_sanitized_blacklisted" flag (this was already the
case with the icon, but now a user may try to unblacklist a value that is
already unblacklisted.)
4. Since the icon needs to be visible by everyone to indicate whether or
not a phone/email is blacklisted, users without corresponding unblacklist
permissions will be able to click on the icon. When they click on it, they
will be informed they do not have permission to unblacklist. A wizard was
determined to be the best way to implement this unblacklisting for the
following reasons:
- A "Unblacklisting Reason" is needed and will not be stored as a field.
- A field widget is unable to do this due to security settings +
inability to refresh view after unblacklisting with a
"Unblacklisting Reason" without wiping unsaved changes.
Additionally, to better align with GDPR, the corresponding form view for
the phone/email blacklist has been updated to use the same wizard to
track "Reason for unblacklisting". Unfortunately there is no
straightforward way to prevent direct "Archive" action, so users are
still able to bypass unblacklisting without being asked for a "reason
for unblacklisting".
Supports task: 2117635
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#939
COM PR: odoo/odoo#45315
|
|
We also have to update code calling directly the rendering itself. Indeed
some code bits does some rendering directly on jinja-enabled input and not
through templates. Those calls have to be updated accordingly.
LINKS
Task ID 1963529
Community PR odoo/odoo#32397
|
|
Task ID 2211781
closes odoo/odoo#47937
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
|
|
Currently the message for help tooltip of auto_delete field is not sufficiently
clear for user to understand.
In this commit, improving message for help tooltip by adding some extra details
in it so user can easily understand about it for models mail.mail, mail.template
and wizard mail_compose_message.
Task-2055702
Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/45063
closes odoo/odoo#45063
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
|
|
* modify client-side domain normalisation to error if the domain is
invalid (not enough terms / segments for the number of operators)
* add better error reporting to attrs / modifiers parsing
* add a few layered error augmentation to provide clearer context
e.g. "error: invalid domain <thing>" is helpful but "error while
parsing modifiers for field foo: modifier invisible: invalid domain
<thing>" is much more helpful
* rework _evalModifiers to deduplicate it in order to more easily
implement this contextual augmentation
* test that improper domains are properly found improper
* fix a bunch of incorrect attrs domains
* also removed an apparently undefined (& unused) "options" argument
to a _applyModifiers call
closes odoo/odoo#44642
Related: odoo/enterprise#8175
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
|
|
RATIONALE
Mail template model holds a field telling odoo mail engine to automatically
add the current user's signature to the body. Its use depends on the use
case
* using the template in the composer on a single record: it is displayed
in the rendered template in the composer, meaning people could change it.
This behavior is interesting as it allows to see the email content;
* using the template in the composer in mass mail mode: it is not displayed
as only the raw jinja is displayed. It is therefore not obvious that it
will be appended to the body of the mail. People could add it manually and
have 2 signatures as a result;
A mechanism automatically adding a signature to sent emails when posting a
message is already implemented and is based on template existence. If a
template has been used when posting, no signature is added in sent emails.
Otherwise it is automatically added. This behavior should not change.
Behavior will therefore be
* use a template -> specify signature usage in it manually through jinja;
* do not use a template -> signature added in sent emails;
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove user_signature.
Update template body accordingly. In customer oriented templates that are using
it and do not already contain it, manually add a call to user.signature within
the jinja code. When set to False, just remove its declaration.
Quickly clean some signature integration.
LINKS
Task ID 2089252
Community PR odoo/odoo#39482
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#6459
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrate#761
Related: odoo/enterprise#6459
Related: odoo/upgrade#761
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
|
|
When simply need to parse a domain, it is easier
Add .strip() on ir.ui.view as ast.literal_eval produces an syntax
error if the node starts with spaces (as done in the xpath of
hr_attendance.view_employee_form_inherit_hr_attendance)
closes odoo/odoo#43831
Related: odoo/enterprise#7894
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
|
|
PURPOSE
Improve mail template preview wizard by improve its views and displaying
more rendered fields. It helps users knowing what will be sent to customers.
SPECIFICATIONS
Rename template model to mail_template_preview to better match the mail
template namespace.
Remove _inherit on mail.template and instead choose fields to compute
and display. Indeed lot of fields are unnecessary or badly computed.
Instead just add fields on the wizard that depends on mail template
and will be computed based on mail_template_id field of wizard.
Improve error management.
LINKS
Task 2085912
PR #38708
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
|
|
From now on mail.mail is considered as a technical model. Indeed people should
not really manually craft mails by hand. Instead various functional flows
should either send mails, either craft mails based on some user input.
We therefore make mail restricted to admin users. Flows creating mail.mail
are updated to use sudo, and ensure it was done in a context that makes
sense to delegate this power to the user.
Task ID 1853147
PR #32243
|
|
from default computation
Purpose of this commit is to correctly compute author_id and email_from
in mail_message and mail_mail as they depends from each other. Moreover it
is a good idea in various flows to specify email and author when giving
creation values to avoid default computation that is not always guaranteed to
be accurate notably when involving super user.
Mail message creation could lead to desynchronized values between author
and email_from. This is improved with this commit by correctly inheriting
from default_get and computing both of them at the same time instead of having
two default values. Indeed they depend on each other.
Same thing is done for mail composer. Mail Thread offers a tool method to
find email_from / author_id based on having one of those values or current
user and it is called whenever necessary.
Some calls to mail template send_mail are also cleaned.
Task ID 1853147
PR #32243
|
|
Purpose of this commit is to remove code coming from old features,
implementations and that was not completely cleaned.
Including
* remove support of old "reply" composition mode which is simply a comment
with a parent message, and is deprecated;
* remove support of old "mail.compose.message.mode" context key that was
used in Odoo 6.1;
* remove support of message_id default value in context instead of
default_parent_id;
* remove old redirection of user / partner post. This code come from
old age when people were able to post on their "profile" by posting
on their user;
* remove unnecessary method for selection field;
* remove unused imports to clean a bit code;
We also make some optional parameters in rendering methods mandatory to
ease code understanding and future modifications.
Task ID 1853147
PR #39272
|
|
if partner_ids and template_id are set, a traceback happens.
Indeed, some mail fields are not taken from the res_ids when partner_ids
is set.
When trying to update the values with the one from the template, the
existing values are popped, which raised an error as those keys weren't
set.
closes odoo/odoo#38434
X-original-commit: c8ad614718674b55e9af5edd062ded958136e7ac
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#38327
X-original-commit: da9e377ba480a034c5d740a6bcb4325f70e7f9e8
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
Currently when inviting someone on a document all recipients are considered
as standard customers. It means access buttons are not displayed and
addon specific behavior not really triggered.
This commit makes use of ``_get_recipient_data`` tool method allowing
to categorize recipients in groups and display buttons and action links
like other post on documents.
Task ID 1967234
closes odoo/odoo#38111
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
|
|
SPECIFICATIONS
In the mail template views, remove the contextual action "Template preview"
from action dropdown. It was a duplicate of smart button in the template
form view and makes no sense in the tree view.
Task ID 2075733
closes odoo/odoo#37425
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
|
|
[PEP 594] is going to depreciate the legacy `email.message.Message` API
and its related modules. Among them the `email.utils.formataddr`
function, this function takes a `(name, email)` pair and returns a
string value suitable for From, To and Cc headers.
The stdlib function is capable of handling several character encoding
and two binary-to-ascii encoding. Odoo only uses `utf-8` which is
compatible with the base64 b2a encoding. The re-implementation of that
function has been simplified to only support base64-ed utf-8 and ascii.
[PEP 594]: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0594/\#email-lagacy-api
|
|
Oversight of previous forward-port.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since #32404, the fallback case where we have no recipients and no parent_id
on message notify has a typo on mail_message. A user will receive a traceback
when using compose message wizard on a record not inheriting from mail_thread if
he forgot to add recipients.
If the typo should be fixed, notifying the user that no recipients were found and thus,
message_notify won't do anything could be interresting. We can raise a UserError
to give a more explicit failure reason.
We would like to avoid to raise this error on a low level like in message_notify
to avoid to break mail_gateway mechanism, but raising it from mail.compose.message
send_mail shouldn't have any side effect.
We can simply check the output of message_notify to know if something was done
to avoid to duplicate logic used to define recipients.
task-2046180
closes odoo/odoo#35378
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
|
|
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closes odoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
The error were untranslatables
Courtesy of Moises Lopez
closes odoo/odoo#35573
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
|
|
PURPOSE
Add some improvements in mail gateway: remove private discussion, improve
bounce management, allow resetting bounce counters, improve automatic set or
reset of blacklists and ease mass mailing inheritance.
SPECIFICATIONS
Private discussion support in mail gateway means having incoming messages
not linked to a document. It means having a void model and res_id on related
messages.
Old private conversations in Odoo were implemented using messages not linked
to any document [1]. It was possible to send an email to some people through
the UX and they were able to answer it. Messages were not attached to any
document and model. There were some limitations to this feature, notably it was
limited to replies (no beginning of private discussion through mail gateway).
One way of doing it was through the use of res.users aliases [2]. There was
also a vaguely twitter-lite use of chatter on HR employee profiles linked
to users aliases, then removed with an explicit support of private
discussions [3].
It is not supported anymore since discussion between users is now done using
chat. Aliases on users have since been removed [4]. Contacting partners or
customers can be done on business documents or on channels. Simple email
discussion is not supported in Odoo as it is not the purpose of mailgateway.
This commit removes code related to private discussion in mail gateway and
some specific support in message_post method.
LINKS
Related to task 1893155
Linked to PR #33340
[1] History is a bit messy, see notably fd90140d7bd05820aeac7bd7e22539893f87319d and commits around
[2] User alias addition 052f2ace57e20f06980bc8fadf37b32be1921420
[3] End of employee twitter-like and posting on users = private discussion 89896f32bbf6aeecfbddc0f7e8397781fce2a99c
[4] User alias removal 029d1baf359eabb7ed531287f3cb2b3b8d586d39
|
|
This attribute is misleading as it is insufficient to correctly upgrade
the database. It only renames the column in the database, but other
operations are needed, like updating the corresponding `ir.model.fields`
record (and its xmlid). The default values and the translations are also
lost during the upgrade.
Moreover, this feature was misused. It was:
- left on fields during multiple versions.
- used on reports (SQL views). This would be ok if the feature was
complete, but, as is, it was useless.
- kept unchanged after a second renaming of the field (which can happen
versions later the first rename).
- used, even when the meaning of the field changed. i.e. the field
`archived` has been renamed to the classic `active`, but the value
in the database should be switched.
|
|
|
