| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When using the "Send & Print" functionality, if the user adds an
attachment, the latter won't be linked to the record.
To reproduce the error:
1. Open a posted invoice
2. Send & Print
3. Attach a file > Select a file on your device
4. Send the email
Error: The invoice's PDF is added to record's attachments, but not the
other file (from step 3).
When the module selects the attachments that need to be linked to the
invoice, it only keeps the ones currently linked to `mail.compose.message`:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6441ab71cb68648aa735057952bf757677a20ee3/addons/mail/models/mail_thread.py#L1719-L1725
This is correct when the user creates a message directly in the chatter.
However, when the mail is created thanks to `Send & Print` functionality,
the attachment is linked to `account.invoice.send`.
Another flow have a similar issue: from invoices list, select few ones,
Action > Send & Print: the generated PDF won't be attached to their
invoice. In such a situation, here is the source of the problem:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/05ad6c477f7da2a495e5baf5b4629323b9d11fa0/addons/mail/wizard/mail_compose_message.py#L363-L367
There isn't any information about the invoice, therefore it is not
possible to linked the attachment to it.
OPW-2438457
closes odoo/odoo#71425
X-original-commit: e87f599d4eb22250b628d650b9f59b54db8d043c
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
The optimization 2ccf0bd0dc does not take into account that to
"unblacklist" a user, you have the archive the mail.blacklist record so
only mail.blacklist active records need to be taken into account.
Added test without the fix fails with:
AssertionError: False is not true : MailTrace: email
test.record.02@test.example.com (recipient res.partner(), state:
sent, record: mailing.test.blacklist(166,)): found 0 records (1 expected)
opw-2536304
closes odoo/odoo#71239
X-original-commit: 8ffd82249728b79959cfa61490730991a2b339d6
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
|
|
Before this commit:
When someone sends mail with help of mail_composer(mail.compose.message)
without having a mail template set, mail is not deleted after being sent
(and causes unwanted/unexpected burden on DB). This bug was introduced
with commit[1], where auto deletion was disabled if template is not set
on the composer.
After this commit:
If there is no mail template set on the composer, or if the template is
set and 'auto_delete' is enabled on that template, the mail sent from
composer will be deleted after being sent successfully.
A context key is added to allow controlling this behavior. It is notably use
to check query counters differences.
commit[1] - https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/8a026e26c6ae25e3fdb5369a7fa3343d70fab782#diff-898a3d5c08a567c1a7b82c026a213d796e850e376cbdb1c9e7936409f440d37aR257
Task id: 2484915
PR odoo/odoo#68870
Original Pr #68403
X-original-commit: 05ad6c477f7da2a495e5baf5b4629323b9d11fa0
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
|
|
- Connect with Admin
- Go to Contacts, edit himself by adding a Private Address
- Create an Internal User without "Access to Private Addresses" right (i.e. User X)
- Go to any app implementing chatter (i.e. Sales)
- Create a SO
- Add the created Private Address as follower
- Make sure User X can access the record (i.e. Sales: Administrator)
- Connect with User X and open the SO
An Access Error is raised while trying to fetch data about the followers.
This commit prevents to:
- add a private address as follower of a record
- add a private address as Recipient in full composer
- propose private addresses when adding a mention to a partner
opw-2428936
closes odoo/odoo#65933
Task-id: 2463622
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
|
|
The `{'infos': 'mail_sent'}` property returned by `action_send_mail()`
was apparently unused, and orginally intended for debugging, according
to its author.
Since previous commit adds a warning for such unknown properties,
removing it entirely keeps the testsuite green. And it's cleaner
than explicitly allowing that extra key, since it's unused.
closes odoo/odoo#62581
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
|
|
As default is called numerous times with sometimes all fields, sometimes
only one field we have to ensure we avoid computing and setting unnecessary
or wrong values. We suspect this comes from default_get being called more
often at creation time since Odoo v14.
Default values for some fields in mail composer are dependent on each other.
Especially composition mode and model / res_id(s) are important for some
fields as behavior is not the same in comment or mass mail mode (subject
set / not set, template values rendered / displayed raw, ...).
Especially subject is wrongly computed in mass mail mode. For example use a
mass mail composer action on leads without template. Indeed a default_get
is called on subject alone. As web client adds active_model / active_id
automatically default returns a value for subject while it should not as
other values (model, res_id) are not asked and therefore not correctly
computed. It makes composer compute values in comment mode while it should
stay in mass mode.
In this commit we fix that behavior by
* computing only requested values (better match returned values and asked
fields);
* avoid computing values if context values are not given (model, res_id or
res_ids, composition_mode);
Task ID-2390314
PR odoo/odoo#62061
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
|
|
Courtesy of translators
Reexport .pot of modified modules
closes odoo/odoo#61002
Related: odoo/enterprise#14485
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
|
|
For large lists of blocked emails, the time taken to load the records in
cache becomes prohibitive. For instance on a sample blocklist of 600k
entries, the `search([])` to load them could take 80-90s to run!
And this toll is taken every time the mail composer processes an email
batch in mass-mailing mode. Technically, most of the time is spent
iterating on the list of ids many time, in order to prefetch fields
into cache by determining what's missing.
Loading the contents of the list in raw SQL takes a fraction of that
time (400ms vs 90s).
Subsequently using a set for lookups in that blocklist is also much
faster (average time complexity O(1) vs O(n)).
Example: looking up an item in a 600k-entry blocklist is easily 5
orders of magnitude faster!
```
In [1]: blocklist = set(x[0] for x in self._cr.fetchall())
In [2]: len(blocklist)
Out[2]: 634610
In [3]: self._cr.execute("SELECT email from mail_blacklist")
In [4]: blocklist = set(x[0] for x in self._cr.fetchall())
In [5]: %timeit "hello@hello.com" in blocklist
The slowest run took 35.29 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached.
10000000 loops, best of 3: 31.6 ns per loop
In [6]: self._cr.execute("SELECT email from mail_blacklist")
In [7]: blocklist = [x[0] for x in self._cr.fetchall()]
In [8]: %timeit "hello@hello.com" in blocklist
100 loops, best of 3: 2.24 ms per loop
```
closes odoo/odoo#57128
X-original-commit: 3b9a85754f30f0bef508d0b576ff679c87ead5da
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
|
|
PURPOSE
Since v13 some commits added code in mail thread file. This file is already
quite long and keeping it organized allow to understand its content.
SPECIFICATIONS
Some methods defined on mail.thread may actually be called on models
not inheriting from mail.thread . Instead of having model methods on mail
thread receiving a records parameter it seems better to have those available
directly on BaseModel.
Move static_message_track on BaseModel in models.py. This method is now called
_mail_track, to be coherent with othe rmail-related naming. It is used in
accounting to track values in line model that does not inherit from mail.
thread. Update accounting accordingly (followup of d862965).
Move _message_get_default_recipients_on_records in models.py. Renaming it
_message_get_default_recipients() allow to be compatible with current behavior
and current override available in some addons (like CRM, event, ...).
Move _notify_get_reply_to_on_records in models.py. Renaming it
_notify_get_reply_to() allows to be shorter and coherent.
Move _alias_check_contact_on_record in models.py. Renaming it
_alias_check_contact_() allows to be shorter and coherent. Its override in
hr is also moved on BaseModel.
Backward compatibility is kept for those methods as this PR target a mostly
stable version.
LINKS
Task ID-2327096 (code cleaning)
PR #56631
|
|
The ir.autovacuum model purpose is to run several garbage collecting
operations like removing files from the filestore when no attachment
references them anymore.
The precedent strategy to register new garbage collection tasks was to
override the `power_on` method and to imperatively execute a vacuum
cleaning method on a given model. All calls were executed in a single
SQL transaction without any error handling, meaning a single fail during
any call resulted in a complete failure of the entire vacuum cleaning
chain.
We introduce a new `@autovacuum` api decorator, its purpose it to
register garbage collecting methods that will be safely executed in
their own transaction by the vacuum cleaner. In order to ensure this
new strategy is used, we deprecate `power_on` extensions.
By the way, garbage-collecting methods can be quite heavy and we don't
want users to directly call them. We now ensure they are private.
closes odoo/odoo#47842
Task: 2154079
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Olivier Dony <odo@odoo.com>
|
|
We also have to update code calling directly the rendering itself. Indeed
some code bits does some rendering directly on jinja-enabled input and not
through templates. Those calls have to be updated accordingly.
LINKS
Task ID 1963529
Community PR odoo/odoo#32397
|
|
Currently the message for help tooltip of auto_delete field is not sufficiently
clear for user to understand.
In this commit, improving message for help tooltip by adding some extra details
in it so user can easily understand about it for models mail.mail, mail.template
and wizard mail_compose_message.
Task-2055702
Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/45063
closes odoo/odoo#45063
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
|
|
RATIONALE
Mail template model holds a field telling odoo mail engine to automatically
add the current user's signature to the body. Its use depends on the use
case
* using the template in the composer on a single record: it is displayed
in the rendered template in the composer, meaning people could change it.
This behavior is interesting as it allows to see the email content;
* using the template in the composer in mass mail mode: it is not displayed
as only the raw jinja is displayed. It is therefore not obvious that it
will be appended to the body of the mail. People could add it manually and
have 2 signatures as a result;
A mechanism automatically adding a signature to sent emails when posting a
message is already implemented and is based on template existence. If a
template has been used when posting, no signature is added in sent emails.
Otherwise it is automatically added. This behavior should not change.
Behavior will therefore be
* use a template -> specify signature usage in it manually through jinja;
* do not use a template -> signature added in sent emails;
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove user_signature.
Update template body accordingly. In customer oriented templates that are using
it and do not already contain it, manually add a call to user.signature within
the jinja code. When set to False, just remove its declaration.
Quickly clean some signature integration.
LINKS
Task ID 2089252
Community PR odoo/odoo#39482
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#6459
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrate#761
Related: odoo/enterprise#6459
Related: odoo/upgrade#761
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
|
|
When simply need to parse a domain, it is easier
Add .strip() on ir.ui.view as ast.literal_eval produces an syntax
error if the node starts with spaces (as done in the xpath of
hr_attendance.view_employee_form_inherit_hr_attendance)
closes odoo/odoo#43831
Related: odoo/enterprise#7894
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
|
|
From now on mail.mail is considered as a technical model. Indeed people should
not really manually craft mails by hand. Instead various functional flows
should either send mails, either craft mails based on some user input.
We therefore make mail restricted to admin users. Flows creating mail.mail
are updated to use sudo, and ensure it was done in a context that makes
sense to delegate this power to the user.
Task ID 1853147
PR #32243
|
|
from default computation
Purpose of this commit is to correctly compute author_id and email_from
in mail_message and mail_mail as they depends from each other. Moreover it
is a good idea in various flows to specify email and author when giving
creation values to avoid default computation that is not always guaranteed to
be accurate notably when involving super user.
Mail message creation could lead to desynchronized values between author
and email_from. This is improved with this commit by correctly inheriting
from default_get and computing both of them at the same time instead of having
two default values. Indeed they depend on each other.
Same thing is done for mail composer. Mail Thread offers a tool method to
find email_from / author_id based on having one of those values or current
user and it is called whenever necessary.
Some calls to mail template send_mail are also cleaned.
Task ID 1853147
PR #32243
|
|
Purpose of this commit is to remove code coming from old features,
implementations and that was not completely cleaned.
Including
* remove support of old "reply" composition mode which is simply a comment
with a parent message, and is deprecated;
* remove support of old "mail.compose.message.mode" context key that was
used in Odoo 6.1;
* remove support of message_id default value in context instead of
default_parent_id;
* remove old redirection of user / partner post. This code come from
old age when people were able to post on their "profile" by posting
on their user;
* remove unnecessary method for selection field;
* remove unused imports to clean a bit code;
We also make some optional parameters in rendering methods mandatory to
ease code understanding and future modifications.
Task ID 1853147
PR #39272
|
|
if partner_ids and template_id are set, a traceback happens.
Indeed, some mail fields are not taken from the res_ids when partner_ids
is set.
When trying to update the values with the one from the template, the
existing values are popped, which raised an error as those keys weren't
set.
closes odoo/odoo#38434
X-original-commit: c8ad614718674b55e9af5edd062ded958136e7ac
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
|
|
[PEP 594] is going to depreciate the legacy `email.message.Message` API
and its related modules. Among them the `email.utils.formataddr`
function, this function takes a `(name, email)` pair and returns a
string value suitable for From, To and Cc headers.
The stdlib function is capable of handling several character encoding
and two binary-to-ascii encoding. Odoo only uses `utf-8` which is
compatible with the base64 b2a encoding. The re-implementation of that
function has been simplified to only support base64-ed utf-8 and ascii.
[PEP 594]: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0594/\#email-lagacy-api
|
|
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closes odoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since #32404, the fallback case where we have no recipients and no parent_id
on message notify has a typo on mail_message. A user will receive a traceback
when using compose message wizard on a record not inheriting from mail_thread if
he forgot to add recipients.
If the typo should be fixed, notifying the user that no recipients were found and thus,
message_notify won't do anything could be interresting. We can raise a UserError
to give a more explicit failure reason.
We would like to avoid to raise this error on a low level like in message_notify
to avoid to break mail_gateway mechanism, but raising it from mail.compose.message
send_mail shouldn't have any side effect.
We can simply check the output of message_notify to know if something was done
to avoid to duplicate logic used to define recipients.
task-2046180
closes odoo/odoo#35378
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
|
|
PURPOSE
Add some improvements in mail gateway: remove private discussion, improve
bounce management, allow resetting bounce counters, improve automatic set or
reset of blacklists and ease mass mailing inheritance.
SPECIFICATIONS
Private discussion support in mail gateway means having incoming messages
not linked to a document. It means having a void model and res_id on related
messages.
Old private conversations in Odoo were implemented using messages not linked
to any document [1]. It was possible to send an email to some people through
the UX and they were able to answer it. Messages were not attached to any
document and model. There were some limitations to this feature, notably it was
limited to replies (no beginning of private discussion through mail gateway).
One way of doing it was through the use of res.users aliases [2]. There was
also a vaguely twitter-lite use of chatter on HR employee profiles linked
to users aliases, then removed with an explicit support of private
discussions [3].
It is not supported anymore since discussion between users is now done using
chat. Aliases on users have since been removed [4]. Contacting partners or
customers can be done on business documents or on channels. Simple email
discussion is not supported in Odoo as it is not the purpose of mailgateway.
This commit removes code related to private discussion in mail gateway and
some specific support in message_post method.
LINKS
Related to task 1893155
Linked to PR #33340
[1] History is a bit messy, see notably fd90140d7bd05820aeac7bd7e22539893f87319d and commits around
[2] User alias addition 052f2ace57e20f06980bc8fadf37b32be1921420
[3] End of employee twitter-like and posting on users = private discussion 89896f32bbf6aeecfbddc0f7e8397781fce2a99c
[4] User alias removal 029d1baf359eabb7ed531287f3cb2b3b8d586d39
|
|
This attribute is misleading as it is insufficient to correctly upgrade
the database. It only renames the column in the database, but other
operations are needed, like updating the corresponding `ir.model.fields`
record (and its xmlid). The default values and the translations are also
lost during the upgrade.
Moreover, this feature was misused. It was:
- left on fields during multiple versions.
- used on reports (SQL views). This would be ok if the feature was
complete, but, as is, it was useless.
- kept unchanged after a second renaming of the field (which can happen
versions later the first rename).
- used, even when the meaning of the field changed. i.e. the field
`archived` has been renamed to the classic `active`, but the value
in the database should be switched.
|
|
|
|
Create an invoice for a customer, send him an email from the chatter, in
the mail template set a specific "Reply to" and send the email. The
"Reply-To" template mail header is ignore and the one generated by
`mail_thread._notify_get_reply_to` is used.
See also 1c57d5e and 7b0806b
opw-2041640
closes odoo/odoo#35127
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <Julien00859@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 7273719b880cc7c57e55a3334ffe99de36b27651.
Reply to header of templates should be used only for mass mailing purpose.
It is a known limitation and should not be changed in table without more
in-depth testing.
closes odoo/odoo#35354
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit removes the field `datas_fname` from `ir.attachment` as
it was unnecessary and most of the time the duplicate of `name` or
`url`.
Task #1909865
closes odoo/odoo#32976
Signed-off-by: Martin Geubelle (mge) <mge@openerp.com>
|
|
Purpose of this commit is to improve performance of post and notify through
various code improvements.
Containing
* making of _notify_customize_recipients a mail.thread method;
* _message_auto_subscribe_followers optimized;
* renaming and optimisation of _notify_partners;
* message_post_attachements optization;
* remove unused mail_post_autofollow_partner_ids context key;
* minimize message create queries;
* only check record related access right for thread messages not in pending
moderation;
* get attachements from values instead of db;
* storing lang in ctx from the beginning;
* don't track on write on attachments;
Related to task 1943901
Linked to PR #32404
|
|
Purpose is to make field use more obvious by correctly stating in the
name it should contain an xml id to a qweb layout used for email
notifications. This renaming is propagated through various calls and
addons.
Related to task 1943901
Linked to PR #32404
|
|
Purpose of this commit is to clean notification process: calls, methods
API, method name, variable propagation.
Contains notably
* simplify API of methods used to group recipients when sending notification
emails;
* improve and rename methods used in email notification process;
* move some methods on model itself as non mail thread records could be
mass-mailed and _notify_email_headers could be called on other records;
Related to task 1943901
Linked to PR #32404
|
|
Message post should always be called on a record (ensure_one). That way we
ensure posting a message is always done in a record's context with right
values computed (reply_to, followers, ...)
Message_notify can be called on record or on mail_thread and must have
partner_ids. It is based on the recently modified user_notification mechanism
and allow to notify a partner on a record or just to push him a message
(aka, not linked to a record).
Small performance improvement
* browse recipients instead of search in _notify_email_recipients;
* todo in future optimizations: mayybe be improve by searching on ids
and is_blacklist immediately;
Related to task 1943901
Linked to PR #32404
|
|
Purpose of this commit is to clean some bits of code, notably calls to
message_post/log as well as notification methods. It will ease performance
improvement work.
Small optimization: account: read content after extension check
Parameter cleaning
* use message log with kwargs instead of args;
* remove message post after hook useless parameters;
* remove _notify_email_recipients useless message parameter;
* remove message_notify useless send_after_commit parameters;
* remove message post params matching default values;
Other improvements
* remove message_post commands support for partners and channels;
* only calls message_post with ids list for channels and partners. We
don't support mix of ids and command anymore to simplify code;
* remove support of private discussion in mail.thread adding partners
as recipients, as there is no use anymore;
Related to task 1943901
Linked to PR #32404
|
|
The stable behaviour of the mail composer is the following:
- if a template adds new attachments, the composer only has this list
- if a template doesn't add attachments, the list is unchanged
- if no template is set, the list is cleared up
In the case of templates, we also check that both static and dynamic attachments
are added to the list.
We clean up after c6d718f2118 and subsequently 516f22c3987 which failed to take
into account the fact that the attachement list could be a blend of commands
and ids.
Transforming that is taken care of by _convert_to_write, which semantics was
changed by c6d718f2118.
To keep the second behaviour, we thus need to add a (5,) command.
opw 2003197
closes odoo/odoo#33707
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
|
|
Some functional flows use sudo() to create records as current user is the
public user. This user has no email. Since 1e6c3bec2c5ca621344b09e58dbed535e80fb343 using sudo does
not take superuser identity completely as it only bypasses access rights.
It means some messages are created with public user as author, meaning no
email_from.
In this commit we fix some functional flows by setting a default email_from
in the message composer only if a real email is found. Otherwise it will have
to be set either by the template, either later in the process when creating
messages or emails.
closes odoo/odoo#34742
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
|
|
This reverts commit 6230f72d2be58069dfd264623944a45c84c99ba4.
Crashing when user have no valid email is the expected behavior. Flows sending
emails must ensure either current user has valid login / email, either it
uses an user OR author_id / email_from that has a meaning in the functional
flow. Notably when public user is involved. Hiding functional issues is not
what we want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The old tree views don't really exist anymore, this odd pseudo-flag to
dispatch between "list" and "tree" tree views has no reason to remain.
Task 1937686
closes odoo/odoo#31243
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
|
|
Fine-tuning of 516f22c3987.
This commit missed attachments that are linked to a mail.template,
which should be added to every mail sent using the template.
To make sure that we both fix the duplicates and the generation issue,
we add a test.
opw 2000515
opw 1998782
closes odoo/odoo#33653
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
