| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This commit is a significant rewriting of client-side discuss, chatter,
chat window, and messaging menu using OWL. The behavior should be broadly
the same, with some slight functional changes here and there.
From a technical standpoint, the code of messaging is mainly organized in 2
main groups of modules:
- models, which are logical entities that depict the client-side state of
messaging as a whole.
- components, which are in charge of displaying information from models.
This refactoring also introduces new JS guidelines regarding folder structure
(/static) and naming rules for JS modules.
Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/39023
Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/6249
Task-1914207
This PR is a collaborative work by Alexandre, Julien, Sébastien and Xavier,
with the precious help of Lucas to speed it up towards the end.
closes odoo/odoo#39023
Related: odoo/enterprise#6249
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Giannone <jgi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys <seb@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier Dubuc <xdu@odoo.com>
|
|
Before this commit, discuss widgets had to wait for the route
`mail/init_messaging`. This behaviour slowed down the loading of the
web client.
This commit solves the issue by rendering discuss widgets even when
`mail/init_messaging` hasn't been resolved. For instance, the
messaging menu displays a spinner until messaging becomes ready.
Task-Id 2072835
closes odoo/odoo#37031
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
|
|
|
|
Before this commit, there could be an infinite loop when changing
the chat window state of a document chat window.
This is caused when mutiple tabs overwrite the chat window state
with a different value everytime, resulting to an infinite loop.
Accross multiple tabs, `setItem` and `onStorage` are not synchronous.
That's why tabs should communicate through local storage events
instead of actual value in the local storage.
To illustrate the issue, suppose there are 2 tabs (T1 and T2) with
one document chat windows (C) and the following user interactions:
- T1 and T2 both have C open
- on T1, user folds C
- on T2, user folds C
Now let's add an example of local storage (LS) logics that could
apply from above example:
- T1 and T2 both have C open
- on T1, user folds C
[1] T1 writes 'C folded' in LS
- on T2, user folds C
[2] T2 writes 'C folded' in LS
[3] T2 detects 'C folded' in LS (from [1])
=> T2 writes 'C folded' in LS
[4] T1 detects 'C folded' in LS (from [2])
=> T1 writes 'C folded' in LS
[5] T1 detects 'C folded' in LS (from [3])
=> T1 writes 'C folded' in LS
[6] T2 detects 'C folded' in LS (from [4])
=> T2 writes 'C folded' in LS
etc...
This scenario could have been easily prevented by not writing on
local storage when the chat window state has not changed. However,
this wouldn't fix this scenario that also introduces an infinite
loop:
- T1 and T2 both have C open
- on T1, user folds C
[1] T1 writes 'C folded' in LS
- on T2, user folds C
[2] T2 writes 'C folded' in LS
- on T2, user unfolds C
[3] T2 writes 'C unfolded' in LS
[4] T2 detects 'C folded' in LS (from [1])
=> T2 writes 'C folded' in LS
[5] T1 detects 'C unfolded' in LS (from [3])
=> T1 writes 'C unfolded' in LS
[6] T2 detects 'C unfolded' in LS (from [5])
=> T2 writes 'C unfolded' in LS
[7] T1 detects 'C folded' in LS (from [4])
=> T1 writes 'C folded' in LS
[8] T2 detects 'C folded' in LS (from [7])
=> T2 writes 'C folded' in LS
[9] T1 detects 'C unfolded' in LS (from [6])
=> T1 writes 'C folded' in LS
etc...
This commit fixes the infinite loop issue:
- by turning local storage read during cross-tab communication into
local storage event read instead. This should prevent race
conditions based on read/write operations in local, since their
order is not guaranteed accros tabs.
- by isolating document chat window state to their own local
storage entry. This should prevent a tab from notifying a chat
window state that it didn't change, which may also result in
an infinite loop.
Some tests were adapted from the changes above. Also, some tests did
pass thanks to local storage being mocked by a ram storage: the
handler `_onStorage` should have been called, but it didn't because
it was registered on the actual local storage instead of the ram
storage. In order to make tests pass again, the following additional
changes were required:
- Cross-tab bus service now exports the unique tab ID with
`getTabId`.
- document thread entries in local storage now track the tab ID, so
that self-tab ignore their own local storage writes.
Task-Id 2034997
Closes #36177
|
|
closes odoo/odoo#35119
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
|
|
Before this commit, most new messages added to the mail manager were
handled as if recently posted from a document thread. As a result, it
was frequently setting a new item in the local storage to notify
other tabs from these new messages.
The intent of this behaviour is to notify other tabs of newly posted
messages in a document thread, without using a longpolling
notification. That means this logic should only apply on messages
that have been recently posted on a document thread.
Sometimes, this issue was breaking the local storage on Firefox.
It showed the error message "Quota Exceeded Error" whenever `setItem`
was used, even when items were removed beforehand. The capacity of
the storage was only a few Kbs on this domain, far from reaching the
maximum capacity. We think that this error comes from the concurrent
`setItem` on multiple tabs, but this is very hard to reproduce.
This commit fixes the issue by limiting the `setItem` to the tab
that really posted the message. Tests have been adapted in order to
pass only with this fix.
|
|
Before this commit, most new messages added to the mail manager were
handled as if recently posted from a document thread. As a result, it
was frequently setting a new item in the local storage to notify
other tabs from these new messages.
The intent of this behaviour is to notify other tabs of newly posted
messages in a document thread, without using a longpolling
notification. That means this logic should only apply on messages
that have been recently posted on a document thread.
Sometimes, this issue was breaking the local storage on Firefox.
It showed the error message "Quota Exceeded Error" whenever `setItem`
was used, even when items were removed beforehand. The capacity of
the storage was only a few Kbs on this domain, far from reaching the
maximum capacity. We think that this error comes from the concurrent
`setItem` on multiple tabs, but this is very hard to reproduce.
This commit fixes the issue by limiting the `setItem` to the tab
that really posted the message. Tests have been adapted in order to
pass only with this fix.
note: backport of 12.2 4bde721f9
opw-2031960
closes #35588
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
|
|
Part of task 1896658
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Christophe Matthieu <chm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: David Monjoie <dmo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: svs-odoo <svs@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt <vsc@odoo.com>
|
|
A document thread is a JS-only entity, which is built from data on
'mail.message' received from the server, or from data of a document.
When we detect a change on the message IDs related to a document thread,
we should update this list on the document thread, so that it knows which
messages haven't be fetched from the server yet.
However, the list of message IDs was not updated on a document thread when
no name could be provided to the document thread, which occurs when there
is no no `display_name` data to determine on the record's name.
In this case, it should update the list of message IDs on this document thread
without altering document name. However, it was neither changing the document
name nor updating the message IDs.
This commit fixes this issue by independently update message IDs and the
document name of a document thread.
|
|
The purpose of this change is to make the code clearer and testable.
In this change, the 'tab_manager' static object was merged with the bus
cross tab.
Cleaning was done to clearly define private and public functions as well
as handlers. The methods are documented and the constants are now defined
on the class. The bus use the service behavior with 'trigger_up'.
'bus.CrossTab' who extend 'bus.Longpolling' are instantiated by the
bus service.
The class is always instantiated with a parent, or root in the case of the website
(im_livechat), to use the ajax and localstorage services. So the behavior, perhaps
logger or redefined by the parents.
|
|
instantiation, thread `getMessages`/`fetchMessages`, and create mode document thread.
* = im_livechat, im_support
- thread widget now uses abstract thread in `render` method
- thread models have their `init` parameters changed, so that the parent may be optional
- reworked 'creating a new record...' in chatter in create mode:
> new model CreateModeDocumentThread, which basically is a fake document thread
with a fake message for its rendering in create mode of the chatter
> special rendering method of thread_widget for such case: `renderChatterCreateMode`
- renamed thread methods previously named `getMessages` to `fetchMessages`:
> in order to not conflict with `getMessages`, used for rendering
> now, `getMessages` always get messages that are locally,
while `fetchMessages` may fetch messages.
TODO:
- special thread model for im_livechat (rendering is broken ATM)
|
|
Also roughly called "open chatter in chat windows".
With this commit, document threads can now be detached in a small thread window.
It uses client-side cross-tab window synchronization by means of the local storage.
To detach a document thread in a thread window, click on the document thread preview
in the systray messaging menu when receving a new (needaction) document thread message.
-------------------------
Technical Limitations
-------------------------
1. In order to use this feature, the user must select the Notification Management
'Handle with Odoo' in the Preferences of the User settings (top-right menu).
2. For the moment, only needaction messages automatically updates the thread window. Manual
refresh is still needed for other kinds of messages (e.g. reload document record to fetch
new messages in the document thread).
Server-side code changes are required to receive new document thread message notifications on the
longpoll bus, which would fix the limitations above.
-------------------------
Future Works
-------------------------
1. Receive any new message from the document thread window when it is detached.
2. Log a note from the document thread window.
Task-33118
|
