1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/addons/barcodes/static/src/js/form_view_barcode_handler.js b/addons/barcodes/static/src/js/form_view_barcode_handler.js
index 788a512dc15..ac5a74e554c 100644
--- a/addons/barcodes/static/src/js/form_view_barcode_handler.js
+++ b/addons/barcodes/static/src/js/form_view_barcode_handler.js
@@ -6,9 +6,22 @@ var utils = require('web.utils');
 var common = require('web.form_common');
 var BarcodeEvents = require('barcodes.BarcodeEvents');
 var BarcodeHandlerMixin = require('barcodes.BarcodeHandlerMixin');
+var KanbanRecord = require('web_kanban.Record');
 
 var _t = core._t;
 
+// web_kanban.Record and web.list_common.Record do not implement the
+// same interface and are thus inherently incompatible with each
+// other. Luckily barcodes keeps things pretty simple when it comes to
+// the records it wants to use. So if we give the KanbanRecord a get()
+// function that behaves like the one of web.list.Record, everything
+// is fine.
+KanbanRecord.include({
+    get: function (key) {
+        return this.values[key] && this.values[key].value;
+    },
+});
+
 var FormViewBarcodeHandler = common.AbstractField.extend(BarcodeHandlerMixin, {
     start: function() {
         this._super();
@@ -71,6 +84,11 @@ var FormViewBarcodeHandler = common.AbstractField.extend(BarcodeHandlerMixin, {
             });
         }
     },
+
+    _get_records: function(field) {
+        return field.viewmanager.active_view.controller.records || // tree view
+            field.viewmanager.active_view.controller.widgets; // kanban view
+    },
 });
 
 core.form_widget_registry.add('barcode_handler', FormViewBarcodeHandler);