summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/odoo/addons/test_read_group/tests/test_auto_join.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorXavier Morel <xmo@odoo.com>2020-03-27 11:21:21 +0000
committerRaphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>2020-05-20 12:51:43 +0000
commit7a7b5b5d9d01e193c2330fe4fe076c2bf53fbc49 (patch)
tree301ca4a6283c9c8d2f92a741b92f3a28dd4f3b14 /odoo/addons/test_read_group/tests/test_auto_join.py
parente950c395b7a2110a19af61220bee3fb8fa5799bc (diff)
[FIX] core: searching through o2m with auto_join
Replaces the auto_join scheme which is pretty fast but doesn't quite work (it's *completely* broken for read_group) by a subquery which is slower but has the same semantics as the ORM version. Ideally we'd use `EXISTS (select 1 from ...)` but that has no support inside the SQL compiler right now, so use `id in (select inverse_field from ...)`. Here are some measures of a `read_group` on a simple object with lines filtered on line values, similar to read_group([('order_line.product_uom', '=', xxx)], fields=['total_amount'], groupby=['user_id']) +-------+-------+-------+--------+ | | ORM | join |subquery| +-------+-------+-------+--------+ | large | 160 | 10 | 20 | +-------+-------+-------+--------+ | many | 36000 | 50 | 180 | +-------+-------+-------+--------+ * values of data fields (filtering, grouping and aggregating) randomly picked between 10 different values * "large" is 1000 objects with 1000~15000 lines each * "many" is 1000000 objects with 1~40 lines each closes odoo/odoo#48494 Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'odoo/addons/test_read_group/tests/test_auto_join.py')
-rw-r--r--odoo/addons/test_read_group/tests/test_auto_join.py3
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/odoo/addons/test_read_group/tests/test_auto_join.py b/odoo/addons/test_read_group/tests/test_auto_join.py
index 6c5e7a88f77..7347645949c 100644
--- a/odoo/addons/test_read_group/tests/test_auto_join.py
+++ b/odoo/addons/test_read_group/tests/test_auto_join.py
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ class TestAutoJoin(common.TransactionCase):
self.assertEqual(len(result1), 1)
self.assertEqual(result1[0]['__count'], 2)
- # TO FIX: the first record is counted twice!
result2 = model.read_group(domain2, [], [])
self.assertEqual(len(result2), 1)
- self.assertEqual(result2[0]['__count'], 3)
+ self.assertEqual(result2[0]['__count'], 2)