summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/odoo/addons/base/tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>2019-09-24 16:59:15 +0000
committerChristophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>2019-09-24 17:45:37 +0000
commitd67b2483e5bfa5d8c1e6ef1a64fb933f5e080ad5 (patch)
tree25a7fd39ac993f3c04c5d8408beb628b3c9948ce /odoo/addons/base/tests
parent38d8b0526f0fccc32df5a11f5d086a3522ed5fcf (diff)
parent9ed4872ea03f28012118ed48a43d0800617a84f3 (diff)
[MERGE] forward port branch saas-12.4 up to 9ed4872ea03
closes odoo/odoo#37372 Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'odoo/addons/base/tests')
-rw-r--r--odoo/addons/base/tests/__init__.py1
-rw-r--r--odoo/addons/base/tests/test_non_regression.py32
-rw-r--r--odoo/addons/base/tests/test_user_has_group.py142
3 files changed, 115 insertions, 60 deletions
diff --git a/odoo/addons/base/tests/__init__.py b/odoo/addons/base/tests/__init__.py
index db7b07f81af..ca045e0c6bb 100644
--- a/odoo/addons/base/tests/__init__.py
+++ b/odoo/addons/base/tests/__init__.py
@@ -37,5 +37,4 @@ from . import test_res_partner
from . import test_res_partner_bank
from . import test_reports
from . import test_tests_tags
-from . import test_non_regression
from . import test_base_document_layout
diff --git a/odoo/addons/base/tests/test_non_regression.py b/odoo/addons/base/tests/test_non_regression.py
deleted file mode 100644
index 1af583c16fa..00000000000
--- a/odoo/addons/base/tests/test_non_regression.py
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
-"""
- Non-Regression Tests
-"""
-
-from odoo.tests.common import TransactionCase
-
-
-class TestNR(TransactionCase):
- def test_issue26036(self):
- # Coming from https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/26036
- U = self.env["res.users"]
- G = self.env["res.groups"]
- group_user = self.env.ref('base.group_user')
- group_no_one = self.env.ref('base.group_no_one')
-
- group_A = G.create({"name": "A"})
- group_AA = G.create({"name": "AA", "implied_ids": [(6, 0, [group_A.id])]})
- group_B = G.create({"name": "B"})
- group_BB = G.create({"name": "BB", "implied_ids": [(6, 0, [group_B.id])]})
- group_C = G.create({"name": "C"})
-
- user_a = U.create({"name": "a", "login": "a", "groups_id": [(6, 0, [group_AA.id, group_user.id])]})
- user_b = U.create({"name": "b", "login": "b", "groups_id": [(6, 0, [group_BB.id])]})
-
- self.assertEqual(user_a.groups_id, (group_AA + group_A + group_user + group_no_one))
-
- (user_a + user_b).write({"groups_id": [(4, group_C.id)]})
-
- self.assertEqual(user_a.groups_id, (group_AA + group_A + group_C + group_user + group_no_one))
- # As user_b is not an internal user, all its groups are removed
- self.assertEqual(user_b.groups_id, group_C)
diff --git a/odoo/addons/base/tests/test_user_has_group.py b/odoo/addons/base/tests/test_user_has_group.py
index 4f5b2bc61dd..f5ea69ea711 100644
--- a/odoo/addons/base/tests/test_user_has_group.py
+++ b/odoo/addons/base/tests/test_user_has_group.py
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ class TestHasGroup(TransactionCase):
self.grp_internal = self.env.ref(self.grp_internal_xml_id)
self.grp_portal_xml_id = 'base.group_portal'
self.grp_portal = self.env.ref(self.grp_portal_xml_id)
+ self.grp_public_xml_id = 'base.group_public'
+ self.grp_public = self.env.ref(self.grp_public_xml_id)
def test_env_uid(self):
Users = self.env['res.users'].with_user(self.test_user)
@@ -51,6 +53,10 @@ class TestHasGroup(TransactionCase):
)
def test_portal_creation(self):
+ """Here we check that portal user creation fails if it tries to create a user
+ who would also have group_user by implied_group.
+ Otherwise, it succeeds with the groups we asked for.
+ """
grp_public = self.env.ref('base.group_public')
grp_test_portal_xml_id = 'test_user_has_group.portal_implied_group'
grp_test_portal = self.env['res.groups']._load_records([
@@ -64,14 +70,16 @@ class TestHasGroup(TransactionCase):
dict(xml_id=grp_test_internal2_xml_id, values={'name': 'Test Group Internal 2'})
])
self.grp_portal.implied_ids = grp_test_portal
- grp_test_internal1.implied_ids = self.grp_internal
- grp_test_internal2.implied_ids = self.grp_internal
+
+ grp_test_internal1.implied_ids = False
+ grp_test_internal2.implied_ids = False
+
portal_user = self.env['res.users'].create({
'login': 'portalTest',
'name': 'Portal test',
'sel_groups_%s_%s_%s' % (self.grp_internal.id, self.grp_portal.id, grp_public.id): self.grp_portal.id,
'sel_groups_%s_%s' % (grp_test_internal1.id, grp_test_internal2.id): grp_test_internal2.id,
- })
+ })
self.assertTrue(
portal_user.has_group(self.grp_portal_xml_id),
@@ -81,45 +89,52 @@ class TestHasGroup(TransactionCase):
portal_user.has_group(grp_test_portal_xml_id),
"The portal user should belong to '%s'" % grp_test_portal_xml_id,
)
- self.assertFalse(
+ self.assertTrue(
portal_user.has_group(grp_test_internal2_xml_id),
- "The portal user should not belong to '%s'" % grp_test_internal2_xml_id
+ "The portal user should belong to '%s'" % grp_test_internal2_xml_id
)
self.assertFalse(
portal_user.has_group(self.grp_internal_xml_id),
"The portal user should not belong to '%s'" % self.grp_internal_xml_id
)
+ portal_user.unlink() # otherwise, badly modifying the implication would raise
+
+ grp_test_internal1.implied_ids = self.grp_internal
+ grp_test_internal2.implied_ids = self.grp_internal
+
+ with self.assertRaises(ValidationError): # current group implications forbid to create a portal user
+ portal_user = self.env['res.users'].create({
+ 'login': 'portalFail',
+ 'name': 'Portal fail',
+ 'sel_groups_%s_%s_%s' % (self.grp_internal.id, self.grp_portal.id, grp_public.id): self.grp_portal.id,
+ 'sel_groups_%s_%s' % (grp_test_internal1.id, grp_test_internal2.id): grp_test_internal2.id,
+ })
+
def test_portal_write(self):
- grp_remove_xml_id = 'test_portal_write.group_to_remove'
- grp_remove = self.env['res.groups']._load_records([
- dict(xml_id=grp_remove_xml_id, values={'name': 'Group to remove'})
- ])
+ """Check that adding a new group to a portal user works as expected,
+ except if it implies group_user/public, in chich case it should raise.
+ """
+ grp_test_portal = self.env["res.groups"].create({"name": "implied by portal"})
+ self.grp_portal.implied_ids = grp_test_portal
+
portal_user = self.env['res.users'].create({
'login': 'portalTest2',
'name': 'Portal test 2',
- 'groups_id': [(6, 0, [grp_remove.id])],
+ 'groups_id': [(6, 0, [self.grp_portal.id])],
})
- grp_test_portal_xml_id = 'test_portal_write.portal_implied_group'
- grp_test_portal = self.env['res.groups']._load_records([
- dict(xml_id=grp_test_portal_xml_id, values={'name': 'Test Group Portal'})
- ])
- self.grp_portal.implied_ids = grp_test_portal
- portal_user.write({'groups_id': [(4, self.grp_portal.id, 0)]})
- self.assertFalse(
- portal_user.has_group(grp_remove_xml_id),
- "The portal user should not belong to '%s'" % grp_remove_xml_id
- )
- self.assertTrue(
- portal_user.has_group(self.grp_portal_xml_id),
- "The portal user should belong to '%s'" % self.grp_portal_xml_id,
- )
- self.assertTrue(
- portal_user.has_group(grp_test_portal_xml_id),
- "The portal user should belong to '%s'" % grp_test_portal_xml_id,
+ self.assertEqual(
+ portal_user.groups_id, (self.grp_portal + grp_test_portal),
+ "The portal user should have the implied group.",
)
+ grp_fail = self.env["res.groups"].create(
+ {"name": "fail", "implied_ids": [(6, 0, [self.grp_internal.id])]})
+
+ with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
+ portal_user.write({'groups_id': [(4, grp_fail.id)]})
+
def test_two_user_types(self):
#Create a user with two groups of user types kind (Internal and Portal)
grp_test = self.env['res.groups']._load_records([
@@ -161,3 +176,76 @@ class TestHasGroup(TransactionCase):
with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
grp_test.write({'implied_ids': [(4, self.grp_portal.id)]})
+
+ def test_demote_user(self):
+ """When a user is demoted to the status of portal/public,
+ we should strip him of all his (previous) rights
+ """
+ group_0 = self.env.ref(self.group0) # the group to which test_user already belongs
+ group_U = self.env["res.groups"].create({"name": "U", "implied_ids": [(6, 0, [self.grp_internal.id])]})
+ self.grp_internal.implied_ids = False # only there to simplify the test by not having to care about its trans_implied_ids
+
+ self.test_user.write({'groups_id': [(4, group_U.id)]})
+ self.assertEqual(
+ self.test_user.groups_id, (group_0 + group_U + self.grp_internal),
+ "We should have our 2 groups and the implied user group",
+ )
+
+ # Now we demote him. The JS framework sends 3 and 4 commands,
+ # which is what we write here, but it should work even with a 5 command or whatever.
+ self.test_user.write({'groups_id': [
+ (3, self.grp_internal.id),
+ (3, self.grp_public.id),
+ (4, self.grp_portal.id),
+ ]})
+
+ # if we screw up the removing groups/adding the implied ids, we could end up in two situations:
+ # 1. we have a portal user with way too much rights (e.g. 'Contact Creation', which does not imply any other group)
+ # 2. because a group may be (transitively) implying group_user, then it would raise an exception
+ # so as a compromise we remove all groups when demoting a user
+ # (even technical display groups, e.g. TaxB2B, which could be re-added later)
+ self.assertEqual(
+ self.test_user.groups_id, (self.grp_portal),
+ "Here the portal group does not imply any other group, so we should only have this group.",
+ )
+
+ def test_implied_groups(self):
+ """ We check that the adding of implied ids works correctly for normal users and portal users.
+ In the second case, working normally means raising if a group implies to give 'group_user'
+ rights to a portal user.
+ """
+ U = self.env["res.users"]
+ G = self.env["res.groups"]
+ group_user = self.env.ref('base.group_user')
+ group_portal = self.env.ref('base.group_portal')
+ group_no_one = self.env.ref('base.group_no_one')
+
+ group_A = G.create({"name": "A"})
+ group_AA = G.create({"name": "AA", "implied_ids": [(6, 0, [group_A.id])]})
+ group_B = G.create({"name": "B"})
+ group_BB = G.create({"name": "BB", "implied_ids": [(6, 0, [group_B.id])]})
+
+ # user_a is a normal user, so we expect groups to be added when we add them,
+ # as well as 'implied_groups'; otherwise nothing else should happen.
+ # By contrast, for a portal user we want implied groups not to be added
+ # if and only if it would not give group_user (or group_public) privileges
+ user_a = U.create({"name": "a", "login": "a", "groups_id": [(6, 0, [group_AA.id, group_user.id])]})
+ self.assertEqual(user_a.groups_id, (group_AA + group_A + group_user + group_no_one))
+
+ user_b = U.create({"name": "b", "login": "b", "groups_id": [(6, 0, [group_portal.id, group_AA.id])]})
+ self.assertEqual(user_b.groups_id, (group_AA + group_A + group_portal))
+
+ # user_b is not an internal user, but giving it a new group just added a new group
+ (user_a + user_b).write({"groups_id": [(4, group_BB.id)]})
+ self.assertEqual(user_a.groups_id, (group_AA + group_A + group_BB + group_B + group_user + group_no_one))
+ self.assertEqual(user_b.groups_id, (group_AA + group_A + group_BB + group_B + group_portal))
+
+ # now we create a group that implies the group_user
+ # adding it to a user should work normally, whereas adding it to a portal user should raise
+ group_C = G.create({"name": "C", "implied_ids": [(6, 0, [group_user.id])]})
+
+ user_a.write({"groups_id": [(4, group_C.id)]})
+ self.assertEqual(user_a.groups_id, (group_AA + group_A + group_BB + group_B + group_C + group_user + group_no_one))
+
+ with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
+ user_b.write({"groups_id": [(4, group_C.id)]})