[IMP] npybabel.py: comment w/ rationale for not using iterparse() in qweb extraction

bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20120206153217-27ns8rl6q0198vqk

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/npybabel.py b/npybabel.py
index b2888cd4a2c..24a97be2cac 100755
--- a/npybabel.py
+++ b/npybabel.py
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ def extract_qweb(fileobj, keywords, comment_tags, options):
         if len(text) > 1: # Avoid mono-char tokens like ':' ',' etc.
             result.append((lineno, None, text, [TRANSLATION_FLAG_COMMENT]))
 
+    # not using elementTree.iterparse because we need to skip sub-trees in case
+    # the ancestor element had a reason to be skipped
     def iter_elements(current_element):
         for el in current_element:
             if "t-js" not in el.attrib and \