<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>Odoo/addons/website_livechat/static/src/xml/thread.xml, branch 14.0</title>
<subtitle>The current checkout of upstream Odoo</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://erp.ceuconsult.com:9000/Odoo/'/>
<entry>
<title>[REF] mail, *: refactor messaging with OWL</title>
<updated>2020-06-15T18:12:21+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sébastien Theys</name>
<email>seb@odoo.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-15T18:12:21+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://erp.ceuconsult.com:9000/Odoo/commit/?id=3fea5b2136627c1d7e83b2a5e111952fe3eb10a1'/>
<id>3fea5b2136627c1d7e83b2a5e111952fe3eb10a1</id>
<content type='text'>
This commit is a significant rewriting of client-side discuss, chatter,
chat window, and messaging menu using OWL. The behavior should be broadly
the same, with some slight functional changes here and there.

From a technical standpoint, the code of messaging is mainly organized in 2
main groups of modules:

- models, which are logical entities that depict the client-side state of
  messaging as a whole.
- components, which are in charge of displaying information from models.

This refactoring also introduces new JS guidelines regarding folder structure
(/static) and naming rules for JS modules.

Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/39023
Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/6249

Task-1914207

This PR is a collaborative work by Alexandre, Julien, Sébastien and Xavier,
with the precious help of Lucas to speed it up towards the end.

closes odoo/odoo#39023

Related: odoo/enterprise#6249
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) &lt;aku@odoo.com&gt;
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn &lt;aku@odoo.com&gt;
Co-authored-by: Julien Giannone &lt;jgi@odoo.com&gt;
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais &lt;lpe@odoo.com&gt;
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys &lt;seb@odoo.com&gt;
Co-authored-by: Xavier Dubuc &lt;xdu@odoo.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This commit is a significant rewriting of client-side discuss, chatter,
chat window, and messaging menu using OWL. The behavior should be broadly
the same, with some slight functional changes here and there.

From a technical standpoint, the code of messaging is mainly organized in 2
main groups of modules:

- models, which are logical entities that depict the client-side state of
  messaging as a whole.
- components, which are in charge of displaying information from models.

This refactoring also introduces new JS guidelines regarding folder structure
(/static) and naming rules for JS modules.

Community PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/39023
Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/6249

Task-1914207

This PR is a collaborative work by Alexandre, Julien, Sébastien and Xavier,
with the precious help of Lucas to speed it up towards the end.

closes odoo/odoo#39023

Related: odoo/enterprise#6249
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) &lt;aku@odoo.com&gt;
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Kühn &lt;aku@odoo.com&gt;
Co-authored-by: Julien Giannone &lt;jgi@odoo.com&gt;
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais &lt;lpe@odoo.com&gt;
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys &lt;seb@odoo.com&gt;
Co-authored-by: Xavier Dubuc &lt;xdu@odoo.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[REV] web: reverts update to fontawesome 5.11.2</title>
<updated>2019-12-09T10:33:36+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kevin Baptiste</name>
<email>kba@odoo.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-12-05T07:18:28+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://erp.ceuconsult.com:9000/Odoo/commit/?id=6cbe824871da51af27ac5b2feb7ecc9fcd6b18d0'/>
<id>6cbe824871da51af27ac5b2feb7ecc9fcd6b18d0</id>
<content type='text'>
This reverts commit ff1c35513aecef5fbc30f7c2f3834450e719714e.

closes odoo/odoo#41480

X-original-commit: 116057b26e71db4692280463669f3e80d813ddcc
Related: odoo/enterprise#7110
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) &lt;yti@odoo.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This reverts commit ff1c35513aecef5fbc30f7c2f3834450e719714e.

closes odoo/odoo#41480

X-original-commit: 116057b26e71db4692280463669f3e80d813ddcc
Related: odoo/enterprise#7110
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) &lt;yti@odoo.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[IMP] web: update to fontawesome 4.7.0 to 5.11.2</title>
<updated>2019-11-28T10:05:12+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kevin Baptiste</name>
<email>kba@odoo.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-08-12T07:18:23+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://erp.ceuconsult.com:9000/Odoo/commit/?id=ff1c35513aecef5fbc30f7c2f3834450e719714e'/>
<id>ff1c35513aecef5fbc30f7c2f3834450e719714e</id>
<content type='text'>
FontAwesome 5 introduced new names for some icons as described on
https://fontawesome.com/how-to-use/on-the-web/setup/upgrading-from-version-4#name-changes

This commit replaces the old names to the new ones.

closes odoo/odoo#35826

Taskid: 2050241
Related: odoo/enterprise#5180
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) &lt;yti@odoo.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
FontAwesome 5 introduced new names for some icons as described on
https://fontawesome.com/how-to-use/on-the-web/setup/upgrading-from-version-4#name-changes

This commit replaces the old names to the new ones.

closes odoo/odoo#35826

Taskid: 2050241
Related: odoo/enterprise#5180
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) &lt;yti@odoo.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[IMP] *: remove image_64 and clean views</title>
<updated>2019-09-19T10:23:39+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sébastien Theys</name>
<email>seb@odoo.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-09-19T10:23:39+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://erp.ceuconsult.com:9000/Odoo/commit/?id=b6288e54461426d7aac6cfc549cee3e90309a093'/>
<id>b6288e54461426d7aac6cfc549cee3e90309a093</id>
<content type='text'>
There are too many image sizes. Since they are stored resized this takes time to
generate when saving a new image, it's more rows on the attachment table, more
files on the disk, ...

64px is close enough to 128px that it can be removed without a big impact on
download size.

It will even reduce download and number of requests when both images are
displayed because now only one has to be downloaded and then benefit from cache.

The difference between the two is typically around 1.5kB which is negligible
these days, especially when the request overhead is around 0.5kB already, not
even taking into account other factors such as latency.

If a 64px image must absolutely be returned, it is still possible to pass the
size parameters to the image route. But the current guideline is to handle
resizing in the views when necessary.

Views
=====

- remove width and height attributes when existing CSS rules are overriding them
  (eg. `.oe_kanban_avatar` in the right context)
- add CSS rules instead of width and height attributes when possible
- use `object-fit: cover;` where width and height are forced to avoid distortion
  of non-square images
- for products, use `object-fit: contain;` instead, keep ratio but without crop
- add new CSS rules where the expected size was max 64px*64px before due to the
  image size itself
- remove `img-fluid` where using size classes to avoid conflicting rules

task-2060865

closes odoo/odoo#36147

Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) &lt;seb@odoo.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
There are too many image sizes. Since they are stored resized this takes time to
generate when saving a new image, it's more rows on the attachment table, more
files on the disk, ...

64px is close enough to 128px that it can be removed without a big impact on
download size.

It will even reduce download and number of requests when both images are
displayed because now only one has to be downloaded and then benefit from cache.

The difference between the two is typically around 1.5kB which is negligible
these days, especially when the request overhead is around 0.5kB already, not
even taking into account other factors such as latency.

If a 64px image must absolutely be returned, it is still possible to pass the
size parameters to the image route. But the current guideline is to handle
resizing in the views when necessary.

Views
=====

- remove width and height attributes when existing CSS rules are overriding them
  (eg. `.oe_kanban_avatar` in the right context)
- add CSS rules instead of width and height attributes when possible
- use `object-fit: cover;` where width and height are forced to avoid distortion
  of non-square images
- for products, use `object-fit: contain;` instead, keep ratio but without crop
- add new CSS rules where the expected size was max 64px*64px before due to the
  image size itself
- remove `img-fluid` where using size classes to avoid conflicting rules

task-2060865

closes odoo/odoo#36147

Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) &lt;seb@odoo.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[IMP] website,livechat : apply various imp and fix on visitor views</title>
<updated>2019-09-17T14:12:19+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Beguin</name>
<email>dbe@odoo.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-08-28T14:06:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://erp.ceuconsult.com:9000/Odoo/commit/?id=6f5abf933b62558423a91f999d9aaa261f6847ad'/>
<id>6f5abf933b62558423a91f999d9aaa261f6847ad</id>
<content type='text'>
Applies various improvements:
  - Remove welcome message if chat request usecase.
  - If a visitor is online: line is green / if offline: line is red (in the list view)
  - Visitors list view: add first / last connection fields and remove time_since_last_action
  - Avoid useless leave notification if the livechat channel is empty

Fix
  - ACLS on website_visitor_page model (for im_livechat_group_user)
  - ACLS on website_visitor and website_visitor_page model (for sales_team.group_sale_salesman)
  - Update visitor lang if visitor change the website lang.
  - Create visitor twice when translated website (due to rerouting)
  - Avatar for visitor banner in discuss. (image_64 instead of old image_small)

Task ID: 2056080
PR #36290</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Applies various improvements:
  - Remove welcome message if chat request usecase.
  - If a visitor is online: line is green / if offline: line is red (in the list view)
  - Visitors list view: add first / last connection fields and remove time_since_last_action
  - Avoid useless leave notification if the livechat channel is empty

Fix
  - ACLS on website_visitor_page model (for im_livechat_group_user)
  - ACLS on website_visitor and website_visitor_page model (for sales_team.group_sale_salesman)
  - Update visitor lang if visitor change the website lang.
  - Create visitor twice when translated website (due to rerouting)
  - Avatar for visitor banner in discuss. (image_64 instead of old image_small)

Task ID: 2056080
PR #36290</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[IMP] website_livechat : allow to send chat request to a website_visitor</title>
<updated>2019-08-19T06:33:37+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Beguin</name>
<email>dbe@odoo.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-07-08T08:13:29+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://erp.ceuconsult.com:9000/Odoo/commit/?id=78e6ce3c3fe565c488b956450ed875629cdd2de0'/>
<id>78e6ce3c3fe565c488b956450ed875629cdd2de0</id>
<content type='text'>
This commit allows a livechat operator to send a chat request to a
connected and available website_visitor.

A visitor is considered as connected if his last tracked website.page request
was within the last 5 minutes.
A visitor is available if he doesn't have an active livechat conversation
(mail_channel with type = livechat).
  - If another operator sent him a chat request
  - Or if the visitor asked himself to speak with an operator
    (via the normal and existing flow)

A livechat conversation is active while the visitor haven't left the conversation.
An operator cannot leave a livechat conversation, only the visitor can.

The flow to send a chat request:
  - On the visitor view (tree or form), operator click on 'send chat request'
    (button or livechat icon)
  - A empty conversation with the visitor pops up at operator side.
  - While the operator didn't send a message, the visitor won't see the conversation.
  - The operator can type a message to the user
  - If the operator close the chat without sending any messages,
    the chat request AND the mail_channel are both deleted.
    In this case, the visitor is then available to send him a new chat request.
  - If the operator send a message, at the visitor's next action
    (page navigation on pages that allows livechat, based on livechat rules),
    the conversation will pop up at visitor side, using the livechat button widget.
    The visitor won't be able to request a livechat conversation with an operator until
    he leaves the chat requested by the operator.
  - Once the visitor leaves (with or without rating) the conversation :
        - the operator is notified that the visitor has left the conversation
        - the chat request is deleted to keep the chat request table clean and minimal
        - the livechat conversation if set to inactive.
  - The visitor is now available again to send him a chat request.

This feature uses the already existing livechat_session cookie mechanism,
so no further code modification was needed to make this work.
It's directly integrated is existing livechat flow.

The chat_request model is only useful to quickly check if a visitor has a chat request
and to send the livechat conversation info to the visitor via the livechat_session cookie.

This commit also add a website_visitor banner info on discuss view :

To be able to quickly see all the relevant information of a website visitor
while talking with in discuss view, a fixed banner have been added.
Only the discuss view will benefit from this because detached chatter window
is to small to display such banner.

Task ID: 34624
PR #2028059</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This commit allows a livechat operator to send a chat request to a
connected and available website_visitor.

A visitor is considered as connected if his last tracked website.page request
was within the last 5 minutes.
A visitor is available if he doesn't have an active livechat conversation
(mail_channel with type = livechat).
  - If another operator sent him a chat request
  - Or if the visitor asked himself to speak with an operator
    (via the normal and existing flow)

A livechat conversation is active while the visitor haven't left the conversation.
An operator cannot leave a livechat conversation, only the visitor can.

The flow to send a chat request:
  - On the visitor view (tree or form), operator click on 'send chat request'
    (button or livechat icon)
  - A empty conversation with the visitor pops up at operator side.
  - While the operator didn't send a message, the visitor won't see the conversation.
  - The operator can type a message to the user
  - If the operator close the chat without sending any messages,
    the chat request AND the mail_channel are both deleted.
    In this case, the visitor is then available to send him a new chat request.
  - If the operator send a message, at the visitor's next action
    (page navigation on pages that allows livechat, based on livechat rules),
    the conversation will pop up at visitor side, using the livechat button widget.
    The visitor won't be able to request a livechat conversation with an operator until
    he leaves the chat requested by the operator.
  - Once the visitor leaves (with or without rating) the conversation :
        - the operator is notified that the visitor has left the conversation
        - the chat request is deleted to keep the chat request table clean and minimal
        - the livechat conversation if set to inactive.
  - The visitor is now available again to send him a chat request.

This feature uses the already existing livechat_session cookie mechanism,
so no further code modification was needed to make this work.
It's directly integrated is existing livechat flow.

The chat_request model is only useful to quickly check if a visitor has a chat request
and to send the livechat conversation info to the visitor via the livechat_session cookie.

This commit also add a website_visitor banner info on discuss view :

To be able to quickly see all the relevant information of a website visitor
while talking with in discuss view, a fixed banner have been added.
Only the discuss view will benefit from this because detached chatter window
is to small to display such banner.

Task ID: 34624
PR #2028059</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
