<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>Odoo/addons/mail/models/ir_ui_view.py, branch 14.0</title>
<subtitle>The current checkout of upstream Odoo</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://erp.ceuconsult.com:9000/Odoo/'/>
<entry>
<title>[FIX] mail: consider `activity` as a valid view type</title>
<updated>2018-09-03T11:40:22+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Martin Geubelle</name>
<email>mge@odoo.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-08-31T13:55:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://erp.ceuconsult.com:9000/Odoo/commit/?id=e27340715785187467e3b3385fb4682e580122b7'/>
<id>e27340715785187467e3b3385fb4682e580122b7</id>
<content type='text'>
The recently introduced `activity` view (see rev. odoo/odoo@1de9496 has not
received all the consideration it deserves as a real view type (no RNG, not in
the valid view `type`, no doc, etc.). It was currently only working based on a
`_get_default_activity_view` method.

Even if the RNG is currently really basic, its grammar could evolve in the future.

This was causing an issue when opening Studio with this view as a default view
with an invalid type was created.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The recently introduced `activity` view (see rev. odoo/odoo@1de9496 has not
received all the consideration it deserves as a real view type (no RNG, not in
the valid view `type`, no doc, etc.). It was currently only working based on a
`_get_default_activity_view` method.

Even if the RNG is currently really basic, its grammar could evolve in the future.

This was causing an issue when opening Studio with this view as a default view
with an invalid type was created.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
