There are inconsistencies in the m2o accounts create & edit behavior.
New off-balance account type was not correctly filtered

This change correct those two issues

Task ID: #2288757

closes odoo/odoo#54626

Related: odoo/enterprise#11920
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert (csn) <csn@openerp.com>

This started from noticing that purchase somewhat oddly *removes* a
filter (internal_type='other') from a domain which is fairly
rare. Looking at the file histories didn't yield anything of
interest ("v9 accounting") but finally looking at the model revealed
an additional multi-company filter missing from both views.

After consulting with @qdp-odoo, @sle-odoo and @lap-odoo, no good
reason was found for the discrepancies:

* internal_type filter should probably always be there, unclear why it
  would get removed from purchase
* whoever added the multicompany filter *probably* missed that it
  would never be used because there was not one but two views
  overriding it (differently)
* sibling "income" field, as well as the corresponding fields on the
  product category, should match (though they were less incoherent).

closes odoo/odoo#44602

Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>

closes odoo/odoo#41632

Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>

As we have to set account on product and product category to know in which
account generate some accounting entries in some business flow (e.i.: expense),
we need to keep some consistence with those accounts.
Since those fields are company dependent, meaning their value depends on the
current company, we want to ease the selection for the end user by only displaying
the relation available in the current company. To do so, specific domain are needed.
This guidelines should be applyied on each property fields.

Task-1999686

This attribute is misleading as it is insufficient to correctly upgrade
the database. It only renames the column in the database, but other
operations are needed, like updating the corresponding `ir.model.fields`
record (and its xmlid). The default values and the translations are also
lost during the upgrade.

Moreover, this feature was misused. It was:
 - left on fields during multiple versions.
 - used on reports (SQL views). This would be ok if the feature was
   complete, but, as is, it was useless.
 - kept unchanged after a second renaming of the field (which can happen
   versions later the first rename).
 - used, even when the meaning of the field changed. i.e. the field
   `archived` has been renamed to the classic `active`, but the value
   in the database should be switched.

Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.

Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`

This commit merges the following models
 * account.invoice and account.move
 * account.invoice.line and account.move.line
 * account.voucher and account.move
 * account.voucher.line and account.move.line

It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.

==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.

The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.

==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist

Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.

Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.

There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.

==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping

field (account.invoice) 		field (account.move)
-----------------------			--------------------
name 					invoice_payment_ref
number 					name
reference 				ref
comment 				narration
user_id 				invoice_user_id
amount_					total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual 				amount_residual
state 					state + invoice_payment_state 		/!\ selection changed
date_invoice 				invoice_date
date_due 				invoice_date_due
sent 					invoice_sent
origin 					invoice_origin
payment_term_id 			invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id 			invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id 				invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id 				invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email 				invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name 			invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon 				invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id 			invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next 			invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix 		invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix

'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()

* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping

field (account.invoice.line) 		field (account.move.line)
----------------------------		-------------------------
invoice_id 				move_id
uom_id 					product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids 			tax_ids
account_analytic_id 			analytic_account_id

'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'

* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping

field (account.invoice.tax) 		field (account.move.line)
---------------------------		-------------------------
invoice_id 				move_id
account_analytic_id 			analytic_account_id
amount 					price_unit
base 					tax_base_amount

'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'

* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line

==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'

Was task 1917430

The goal is to be coherent with the user property.

Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.

Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.

Consider the following use case:
- Two taxes:
-A: price included, affect base of subsequent taxes, 10%
-B: 15%, regular
- Create an invoice with a line applying A, then B, for 110€. Post it
- The following move lines are generated:
- base: 100€
- tax A: 10€
- tax B: 16.5€

Before this fix, line "tax A" only had the tax tags of tax A. It should also receive the base tags from tax B, in order to affect its grid total correctly in the tax report.

Also, tax_base_amount field used to be computed, but its computation was too simple, and most of the time wrong when doing advanced use of taxes like the one we defined above. It is now not computed anymore, and directly takes its value from the compute_all's result.

closes odoo/odoo#33420

Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>